Schäfer Michal, Di Maria Michael V, Jaggers James, Stone Matthew L, Campbell David N, Ivy D Dunbar, Mitchell Max B
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
JTCVS Open. 2023 Sep 30;16:836-843. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.09.030. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC) for stage II palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is achieved most frequently by either a bidirectional Glenn (BDG) or hemi-Fontan (HF) operation. The comparison of flow hemodynamic efficiency at the region of surgical reconstruction and in proximal pulmonary arteries has been evaluated primarily using computational modeling techniques with conflicting reports. The purpose of this descriptive study was to compare flow hemodynamics following stage II (BDG vs HF) using 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D-Flow MRI) with particular focus on flow-mediated viscous energy loss () under matched hemodynamic conditions.
Patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) who underwent either HF or BDG as part of stage II palliation underwent pre-Fontan 4D-Flow MRI. Patients were matched by the pulmonary vascular resistance index, net superior vena cava (SVC) flow, right pulmonary artery (RPA) and left pulmonary artery (LPA) size, and age. Maximum throughout the cardiac cycle was calculated along the SVC-RPA and SVC-LPA tracts.
Eight patients who underwent HF as part of their stage II single ventricle palliation were matched with 8 patients who underwent BDG. There were no differences between the 2 groups in median volumetric indices, including end-diastolic volume ( = .278) and end-systolic volume ( = .213). Moreover, no differences were observed in ejection fraction ( = .091) and cardiac index ( = .324). There also were no differences in peak measured along the SVC-RPA tract (median, 0.05 mW for HF vs 0.04 mW for BDG; = .365) or along the SVC-LPA tract (median, 0.05 mW vs 0.04 mW; = .741).
The second stage of surgical palliation of HLHS using either HF or BDG results in similar flow-mediated viscous energy loss throughout the SCPC junction. 4D-Flow MRI and computational methods should be applied together to investigate flow hemodynamic patterns throughout the Fontan palliation and overall efficiency of the Fontan circuit.
对于左心发育不全综合征(HLHS)二期姑息治疗的上腔静脉-肺动脉连接术(SCPC),最常用的方法是双向格林分流术(BDG)或半Fontan手术(HF)。主要使用计算建模技术评估手术重建区域和近端肺动脉处的血流动力学效率,结果报告相互矛盾。本描述性研究的目的是使用四维血流磁共振成像(4D-Flow MRI)比较二期(BDG与HF)术后的血流动力学,特别关注匹配血流动力学条件下的血流介导粘性能量损失()。
接受HF或BDG作为二期姑息治疗一部分的左心发育不全综合征(HLHS)患者接受Fontan手术前的4D-Flow MRI检查。根据肺血管阻力指数、上腔静脉(SVC)净流量、右肺动脉(RPA)和左肺动脉(LPA)大小以及年龄对患者进行匹配。计算整个心动周期中沿SVC-RPA和SVC-LPA路径的最大。
8例接受HF作为二期单心室姑息治疗一部分的患者与8例接受BDG的患者相匹配。两组在中位容积指数方面无差异,包括舒张末期容积(=0.278)和收缩末期容积(=0.213)。此外,射血分数(=0.091)和心脏指数(=0.324)也无差异。沿SVC-RPA路径测量的峰值也无差异(HF组中位数为0.05 mW,BDG组为0.04 mW;=0.365),或沿SVC-LPA路径(中位数为0.05 mW对0.04 mW;=0.741)。
使用HF或BDG对HLHS进行二期手术姑息治疗,在整个SCPC连接处导致相似的血流介导粘性能量损失。应将4D-Flow MRI和计算方法结合应用,以研究整个Fontan姑息治疗过程中的血流动力学模式以及Fontan循环的整体效率。