• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of EPDS Scores Among Women with Good Neonatal Outcomes and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes.新生儿结局良好与不良的女性之间的爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)得分比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Dec;73(6):552-554. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01650-x. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Rates and precipitating factors for postpartum depression following screening in consecutive births.连续分娩筛查后产后抑郁症的发生率及诱发因素。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(14):2275-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1083004. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
3
Impact of maternal stressors and neonatal clinical factors on post-partum depression screening scores.产妇应激源和新生儿临床因素对产后抑郁筛查评分的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Apr;35(7):1328-1336. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1754394. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
4
In search of best practice for postpartum depression screening: is once enough?探寻产后抑郁症筛查的最佳实践:筛查一次就够了吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Comparison of placenta consumers' and non-consumers' postpartum depression screening results using EPDS in US community birth settings (n=6038): a propensity score analysis.美国社区分娩环境中(n=6038)使用 EPDS 比较胎盘食用者和非食用者产后抑郁筛查结果的倾向评分分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 22;23(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05852-7.
6
Postpartum Depression and Anxiety in COVID-19-Positive and COVID-19-Negative Mothers: Insights From a Dedicated Hospital in Eastern India.新冠病毒检测呈阳性和阴性的产妇的产后抑郁与焦虑:来自印度东部一家专科医院的见解
Cureus. 2025 Mar 18;17(3):e80753. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80753. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Re-evaluation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as screening for post-partum depression in Iwate Prefecture, Japan.对爱丁堡产后抑郁量表在日本岩手县作为产后抑郁症筛查工具的重新评估。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Sep;45(9):1876-1883. doi: 10.1111/jog.14042. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
8
Universal screening of postpartum depression with Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale: A prospective observational study.使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表对产后抑郁症进行普遍筛查:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;167(2):758-764. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15722. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
9
Validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a screening tool for postpartum depression in Kathmandu, Nepal.验证爱丁堡产后抑郁量表作为尼泊尔加德满都产后抑郁症筛查工具的有效性。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Oct 21;10:71. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0102-6. eCollection 2016.
10
Translation and Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for Eritrea: A Screening Tool for Postpartum Depression in Primary Health Care Facilities.厄立特里亚爱丁堡产后抑郁量表的翻译与验证:基层医疗保健机构中产后抑郁的筛查工具
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Feb 6;17:299-310. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S487258. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's psychological experiences of preterm labour and birth which results in an intrapartum stillbirth or a neonatal death: an empty systematic review.导致产时死产或新生儿死亡的早产和分娩的女性心理体验:一项空洞的系统评价。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 5;16:1544485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1544485. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Perinatal depression-knowledge gap among service providers and service utilizers in India.围产期抑郁症——印度服务提供者和服务使用者之间的知识差距。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jan;47:101822. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
2
Postpartum depression in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.印度的产后抑郁症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Oct 1;95(10):706-717C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.192237. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
3
Postpartum Depression in Women: A Risk Factor Analysis.女性产后抑郁症:危险因素分析
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):QC13-QC16. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25480.10479. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
Screening for perinatal depression: a missed opportunity.围产期抑郁症筛查:一个被错失的机会。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00265-8.

新生儿结局良好与不良的女性之间的爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)得分比较。

Comparison of EPDS Scores Among Women with Good Neonatal Outcomes and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes.

作者信息

Prasad Madhva, Joshi Aditi, Saxena Akriti

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Acharya Donde Marg, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.

Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Joshi Hospital, Bramhin Alley, BhiwandiKalyan, Maharashtra India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Dec;73(6):552-554. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01650-x. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1007/s13224-022-01650-x
PMID:38205111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10774250/
Abstract

A comparative, questionnaire-based study among postpartum patients was conducted using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. 80 women who had good neonatal outcomes were compared with 80 women who had adverse neonatal outcomes. Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. The average EPDS score in those with good neonatal outcomes was lesser than that of those with adverse neonatal outcome (10.07 vs11.04, p 0.045). Using the cut-off value of 9, the proportion of women who tested positive (higher chance of PPD) was statistically significantly higher (p value 0.0488) in adverse neonatal outcomes group (45% vs 28.75%). This result showed that women who have experienced stillbirth/ neonatal mortality or had neonates who needed NICU care have a higher propensity for PPD. This implies that women who have experienced stillbirth/neonatal mortality should be considered for prioritization in screening for PPD. PPD screening, even if not done routinely, should be done in this selected group (adverse perinatal outcomes group) on priority.

摘要

一项基于问卷的产后患者比较研究使用了爱丁堡产后抑郁量表。将80名新生儿结局良好的女性与80名新生儿结局不良的女性进行了比较。两组的人口统计学特征相似。新生儿结局良好者的平均爱丁堡产后抑郁量表得分低于新生儿结局不良者(10.07对11.04,p = 0.045)。以9分为临界值,新生儿结局不良组检测呈阳性(产后抑郁症可能性更高)的女性比例在统计学上显著更高(p值为0.0488)(45%对28.75%)。这一结果表明,经历过死产/新生儿死亡或新生儿需要重症监护病房护理的女性患产后抑郁症的倾向更高。这意味着,经历过死产/新生儿死亡的女性应被优先考虑进行产后抑郁症筛查。即使不进行常规产后抑郁症筛查,也应优先对这一特定群体(围产期结局不良组)进行筛查。