Baludo Marjohn Yucada, Octorina Pelita, Beckerman Andrew, Straile Dietmar
Limnologisches Institut Universität Konstanz Konstanz Germany.
Department Aquaculture Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi Sukabumi Indonesia.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):e10841. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10841. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Prey communities in natural environments face a diverse array of predators with distinct hunting techniques. However, most studies have focused only on the interactions between a single prey species and one or more predators and typically only one of many induced defense traits, which limits our understanding of the broader effects of predators on prey communities. In this study, we conducted a common garden experiment using five clones each of three species (, , and ) from the species complex to investigate the plasticity of predator-induced defenses in response to two predators in a community ecology setting. Five clones from each species were subjected to predator kairomones from two closely related invertebrate predators that are common in several European lakes, or for a duration of 10 days, and the morphological traits of body size, head size, spina size, and the presence of spinules on the ventral and dorsal carapace margins were measured. We show that among the species within this species complex there are different antipredator reactions to the invertebrate predators. The induced responses exhibited were species, trait, and predator-specific. Notably, and developed distinctive helmets as defensive mechanisms, while microdefenses were induced in and , but not in . This demonstrates that the expression of micro- and macrodefenses across species was unrelated, highlighting the possible independent evolution of microstructures as defensive modules in 's antipredator strategies. This study is the first to document both micro- and macrodefensive phenotypic plasticity in three co-occurring species within the species complex. The differences in inducible defenses may have a substantial impact on how these three species cohabit with and .
自然环境中的猎物群落面临着一系列具有不同狩猎技巧的捕食者。然而,大多数研究仅关注单一猎物物种与一种或多种捕食者之间的相互作用,并且通常只涉及众多诱导防御特征中的一种,这限制了我们对捕食者对猎物群落更广泛影响的理解。在本研究中,我们进行了一项共同花园实验,使用来自该物种复合体的三个物种(、和)的五个克隆,以在群落生态学环境中研究捕食者诱导防御对两种捕食者的可塑性。每个物种的五个克隆暴露于来自两种在欧洲几个湖泊中常见的密切相关的无脊椎动物捕食者的捕食者信息素,或,持续10天,并测量了身体大小、头部大小、棘大小以及腹甲和背甲边缘上小刺的存在等形态特征。我们表明,在这个物种复合体内的物种之间,对无脊椎动物捕食者有不同的反捕食反应。所表现出的诱导反应是物种、特征和捕食者特异性的。值得注意的是,和形成了独特的头盔作为防御机制,而在和中诱导了微防御,但在中没有。这表明跨物种的微防御和宏防御的表达是不相关的,突出了微观结构作为反捕食策略中防御模块可能的独立进化。本研究首次记录了该物种复合体内三个共存物种的微防御和宏防御表型可塑性。诱导防御的差异可能对这三个物种与和的共存方式产生重大影响。