Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Apr;43(4):771-779. doi: 10.1002/jum.16409. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in evaluating angiogenesis in carotid artery plaques and prognosis in stroke patients. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques were selected. All patients received conventional ultrasound, CEUS, and SMI examination, including 32 patients with cerebral infarction and 29 patients without cerebral infarction. The results of CEUS and SMI neovascularization of patients were graded 0, 1, and 2 points according to the image characteristics. The consistency between SMI results and CEUS results was evaluated, and the differences in neovascularization in carotid plaques between patients with cerebral infarction and those without cerebral infarction were compared. RESULTS: SMI showed that the neovascularization score in plaque was 0 point in 13 cases, 1 point in 24 cases, and 2 points in 24 cases. There were no significant differences in age, sex, plaque size, or echo between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the SMI and CEUS results, P > .05. The CEUS neovascularization grade of patients with cerebral infarction had a higher score, which was significantly different from that of patients without cerebral infarction, P < .05. The SMI neovascularization grade of patients with cerebral infarction had a higher score, which was significantly different from that of patients without cerebral infarction, P < .05. CONCLUSION: SMI can show neovascularization in plaques, with a significantly higher grade of neovascularization in those of patients with cerebral infarction than in those without cerebral infarction.
目的:本研究旨在探讨超声造影(CEUS)和超微血流成像(SMI)在评估颈动脉斑块血管生成及预测脑卒中患者预后中的价值。
方法:选取 61 例颈动脉粥样硬化斑块患者,均行常规超声、CEUS 和 SMI 检查,其中脑梗死患者 32 例,无脑梗死患者 29 例。根据图像特征,将患者 CEUS 和 SMI 新生血管化结果分为 0、1、2 分。评价 SMI 结果与 CEUS 结果的一致性,比较脑梗死组与无脑梗死组颈动脉斑块新生血管化的差异。
结果:SMI 显示斑块内新生血管化评分 0 分 13 例,1 分 24 例,2 分 24 例。两组患者年龄、性别、斑块大小、回声等方面差异均无统计学意义。SMI 与 CEUS 结果比较差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。脑梗死患者的 CEUS 新生血管化分级评分较高,与无脑梗死患者比较差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。脑梗死患者的 SMI 新生血管化分级评分较高,与无脑梗死患者比较差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。
结论:SMI 可显示斑块内新生血管化,脑梗死患者斑块内新生血管化程度明显高于无脑梗死患者。
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2018-8-30
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018-9
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019-3
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2025-4-23