Department of Psychology, Georgetown University.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Aug;127(2):259-276. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000377. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
In four preregistered studies (total = 5,067), we investigated whether people use their own anticipated affective responses to a situation to make judgments about the praiseworthiness of helping and the moral character of helpers. We found that helpers in more affectively arousing scenarios were seen as more morally motivated, received greater praise, and were seen as having more positive moral character, even when controlling for the perceived benefits of helping. Describing helpers as unemotional reduced the effect of observers' anticipated affect on character judgments. These results suggest that when making praise and character judgments, people not only consider the consequences of a helper's actions but also the emotions they experience when engaging in them-and that they use their own anticipated emotional experience to do this. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
在四项预先注册的研究中(总计=5067),我们调查了人们是否会利用自己对情境的预期情感反应来判断帮助的值得称赞程度和帮助者的道德品质。我们发现,在情绪唤起程度更高的情境中,帮助者被认为更有道德动机,会得到更多的赞扬,并且被认为具有更积极的道德品质,即使在控制了帮助的感知益处的情况下也是如此。将帮助者描述为没有情绪会降低观察者对性格判断的预期影响。这些结果表明,当人们做出表扬和性格判断时,他们不仅会考虑帮助者行为的后果,还会考虑他们在其中体验到的情绪,并且他们会利用自己预期的情感体验来进行判断。