University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA.
University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
Behav Modif. 2024 May;48(3):259-284. doi: 10.1177/01454455231221289. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
The purpose of this pre-registered study (Peltier & McKenna) was to conceptually replicate if the truncation of the ordinate and DPPXYR increased analysts' estimation of a functional relation and magnitude of treatment effect. Visual analysts ( = 27) evaluated eight data sets reporting null ( = 2), small ( = 2), moderate ( = 2), and large ( = 2) effects. Each data set was graphed six times with manipulations of the ordinate and DPPXYR, resulting in 48 ABAB graphs. We estimated two separate three-level mixed effect models with variations nested in datasets and nested in participants to evaluate the impact of graph characteristics for (1) confidence in determining a functional relation and (2) the estimated magnitude of the treatment effect. We included ordinate scaling and DPPXYR at level 1 and graph effect size at level 2, including all interactions. Overall, graph manipulation consistently did not impact confidence in a functional relation. Results suggest mixed findings for graph manipulation on the estimated magnitude of the treatment effect. Findings will be couched in current literature and recommendations for graph construction and future research will be discussed.
本预先注册研究(Peltier & McKenna)的目的是在概念上复制如果截断纵坐标和 DPPXYR 是否会增加分析人员对功能关系和治疗效果大小的估计。视觉分析员( = 27)评估了八个报告无效( = 2)、小( = 2)、中( = 2)和大( = 2)效果的数据。每个数据集都以纵坐标和 DPPXYR 的操作绘制了六次,共得到 48 个 ABAB 图。我们估计了两个单独的三级混合效应模型,其中数据集和参与者嵌套了变化,以评估图形特征对(1)确定功能关系的信心和(2)治疗效果的估计大小的影响。我们在一级包括纵坐标缩放和 DPPXYR,在二级包括图形效果大小,包括所有交互作用。总的来说,图形操作并没有一致地影响对功能关系的信心。结果表明,图形操作对治疗效果估计大小的影响存在混合结果。研究结果将结合当前文献进行讨论,并讨论图形构建的建议和未来的研究方向。