Departement of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 , Ferrara, Italy.
Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Mar;108(1):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00808-8. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
Interimplant fractures present a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Despite a noticeable rise in these cases in recent years, our understanding of this specific fracture type remains limited. This study aims to analyze and identify the primary risk factors associated with interimplant femoral fractures. We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 20 patients with interimplant femoral fracture (case group) and 18 patients who had both proximal and distal femoral implants but did not experience interimplant fractures (control group). Our analysis focused on demographic factors (age, sex, BMI) and radiographic parameters (implant types, gap between implants, cortical thickness, femoral canal area) to identify potential risk factors. In the case group, all patients were females, whereas in the control group, 16 patients were female and 2 were males. The mean age in the case group was 88 [Formula: see text] 9 years and in the control group was 87 [Formula: see text] 12 years. None of the demographic differences reached statistical significance. The mean cortical thickness in the case group was 6 [Formula: see text] 2.25 mm, whereas in the control group, it was 9 [Formula: see text] 1.75 mm (p-value < 0.001). The median gap between the proximal and distal tips of the implants measured 194 [Formula: see text] 126 mm in the case group and 66 [Formula: see text] 78 mm in the control group (p-value < 0.001). Additionally, the mean femoral canal area was 284 [Formula: see text] 102 mm in the case group and 227 [Formula: see text] 26 mm in the control group (p-value < 0.010). Our data indicate that a small cortical thickness, a wide femoral canal area, and having a hip arthroplasty despite a gap between the implants exceeding 110 mm are factors that elevate the risk of interimplant femoral fracture. Notably, osteoporosis therapy emerges as a protective factor against these fractures.
内植物间骨折对矫形外科医生来说是一个重大挑战。尽管近年来此类病例明显增多,但我们对这种特定骨折类型的了解仍然有限。本研究旨在分析和确定与股骨内植物间骨折相关的主要危险因素。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,涉及 20 例股骨内植物间骨折患者(病例组)和 18 例股骨近端和远端均有内植物但未发生内植物间骨折的患者(对照组)。我们的分析重点关注了人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、BMI)和影像学参数(植入物类型、植入物之间的间隙、皮质厚度、股骨髓腔面积),以确定潜在的危险因素。在病例组中,所有患者均为女性,而在对照组中,16 例为女性,2 例为男性。病例组的平均年龄为 88 [Formula: see text] 9 岁,对照组为 87 [Formula: see text] 12 岁。这些人口统计学差异均无统计学意义。病例组的平均皮质厚度为 6 [Formula: see text] 2.25 毫米,而对照组为 9 [Formula: see text] 1.75 毫米(p 值<0.001)。病例组股骨近端和远端植入物尖端之间的中位间隙为 194 [Formula: see text] 126 毫米,对照组为 66 [Formula: see text] 78 毫米(p 值<0.001)。此外,病例组的股骨髓腔面积平均为 284 [Formula: see text] 102 毫米,对照组为 227 [Formula: see text] 26 毫米(p 值<0.010)。我们的数据表明,皮质厚度较小、股骨髓腔面积较大、髋关节置换术后即使植入物之间的间隙超过 110 毫米,这些都是增加股骨内植物间骨折风险的因素。值得注意的是,骨质疏松症治疗是预防这些骨折的保护因素。