• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体间股骨骨折:危险因素分析。

Interimplant femoral fracture: analysis of risk factors.

机构信息

Departement of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 , Ferrara, Italy.

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Mar;108(1):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00808-8. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12306-023-00808-8
PMID:38214868
Abstract

Interimplant fractures present a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Despite a noticeable rise in these cases in recent years, our understanding of this specific fracture type remains limited. This study aims to analyze and identify the primary risk factors associated with interimplant femoral fractures. We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 20 patients with interimplant femoral fracture (case group) and 18 patients who had both proximal and distal femoral implants but did not experience interimplant fractures (control group). Our analysis focused on demographic factors (age, sex, BMI) and radiographic parameters (implant types, gap between implants, cortical thickness, femoral canal area) to identify potential risk factors. In the case group, all patients were females, whereas in the control group, 16 patients were female and 2 were males. The mean age in the case group was 88 [Formula: see text] 9 years and in the control group was 87 [Formula: see text] 12 years. None of the demographic differences reached statistical significance. The mean cortical thickness in the case group was 6 [Formula: see text] 2.25 mm, whereas in the control group, it was 9 [Formula: see text] 1.75 mm (p-value < 0.001). The median gap between the proximal and distal tips of the implants measured 194 [Formula: see text] 126 mm in the case group and 66 [Formula: see text] 78 mm in the control group (p-value < 0.001). Additionally, the mean femoral canal area was 284 [Formula: see text] 102 mm in the case group and 227 [Formula: see text] 26 mm in the control group (p-value < 0.010). Our data indicate that a small cortical thickness, a wide femoral canal area, and having a hip arthroplasty despite a gap between the implants exceeding 110 mm are factors that elevate the risk of interimplant femoral fracture. Notably, osteoporosis therapy emerges as a protective factor against these fractures.

摘要

内植物间骨折对矫形外科医生来说是一个重大挑战。尽管近年来此类病例明显增多,但我们对这种特定骨折类型的了解仍然有限。本研究旨在分析和确定与股骨内植物间骨折相关的主要危险因素。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,涉及 20 例股骨内植物间骨折患者(病例组)和 18 例股骨近端和远端均有内植物但未发生内植物间骨折的患者(对照组)。我们的分析重点关注了人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、BMI)和影像学参数(植入物类型、植入物之间的间隙、皮质厚度、股骨髓腔面积),以确定潜在的危险因素。在病例组中,所有患者均为女性,而在对照组中,16 例为女性,2 例为男性。病例组的平均年龄为 88 [Formula: see text] 9 岁,对照组为 87 [Formula: see text] 12 岁。这些人口统计学差异均无统计学意义。病例组的平均皮质厚度为 6 [Formula: see text] 2.25 毫米,而对照组为 9 [Formula: see text] 1.75 毫米(p 值<0.001)。病例组股骨近端和远端植入物尖端之间的中位间隙为 194 [Formula: see text] 126 毫米,对照组为 66 [Formula: see text] 78 毫米(p 值<0.001)。此外,病例组的股骨髓腔面积平均为 284 [Formula: see text] 102 毫米,对照组为 227 [Formula: see text] 26 毫米(p 值<0.010)。我们的数据表明,皮质厚度较小、股骨髓腔面积较大、髋关节置换术后即使植入物之间的间隙超过 110 毫米,这些都是增加股骨内植物间骨折风险的因素。值得注意的是,骨质疏松症治疗是预防这些骨折的保护因素。

相似文献

1
Interimplant femoral fracture: analysis of risk factors.种植体间股骨骨折:危险因素分析。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Mar;108(1):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00808-8. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
Incidence of and risk factors for femoral fractures in the gap between hip and knee implants.髋关节与膝关节植入物之间间隙处股骨骨折的发生率及危险因素
Int Orthop. 2016 Aug;40(8):1697-1702. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2978-1. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
Cortical encroachment after cephalomedullary nailing of the proximal femur: evaluation of a more anatomic radius of curvature.股骨干近端顺行髓内钉固定后皮质骨受侵:评估更解剖学的曲率半径。
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jun;27(6):303-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318283f24f.
4
Interimplant femoral fractures: risk factors, treatment and evolution.股骨植入物间骨折:危险因素、治疗及进展
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed). 2018 Nov-Dec;62(6):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Factors affecting peri-implant fracture following locking plate for osteoporotic distal femur fractures.影响锁定钢板治疗骨质疏松性股骨远端骨折后钢板周围骨折的因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Dec;103(8):1201-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
6
Femoral Component Undersizing and Alignment are Risk Factors for Early Periprosthetic Femur Fracture.股骨部件尺寸不足和对线不良是早期假体股骨骨折的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S604-S610. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.与一种独特的非骨水泥型股骨柄设计相关的假体周围股骨骨折风险增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2045-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
8
Are women with thicker cortices in the femoral shaft at higher risk of subtrochanteric/diaphyseal fractures? The study of osteoporotic fractures.股骨粗隆下/骨干骨折风险较高的女性,其股骨粗隆部皮质是否较厚?骨质疏松性骨折研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jul;97(7):2414-22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3256. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
9
Interimplant femoral fractures.股骨植入物间骨折
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1S):103117. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103117. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
10
Low-energy diaphyseal femoral fractures associated with bisphosphonate use and severe curved femur: a case series.与双膦酸盐使用和严重弯曲股骨相关的低能量骨干股骨骨折:病例系列。
J Bone Miner Metab. 2012 Sep;30(5):561-7. doi: 10.1007/s00774-012-0358-0. Epub 2012 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of previous lumbar spine surgery on total hip arthroplasty and vice versa: How long should we be concerned about mechanical failure?先前腰椎手术对全髋关节置换术的影响及反之:我们应该担心多久机械故障?
Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep;32(9):2949-2958. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07866-3. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
2
Fast Track Protocols and Early Rehabilitation after Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.全髋关节置换术后的快速康复方案与早期康复:一项叙述性综述
Clin Pract. 2023 Apr 25;13(3):569-582. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13030052.
3
Interprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: is bone strut allograft augmentation with ORIF a validity alternative solution in elderly?
人工关节间和植入物间股骨骨折:对于老年人,切开复位内固定术联合异体骨支柱移植是否是一种有效的替代解决方案?
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 Oct 13;14(6):38558. doi: 10.52965/001c.38558. eCollection 2022.
4
Interimplant femoral fractures.股骨植入物间骨折
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1S):103117. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103117. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
5
Direct medical costs of interprosthetic femoral fracture treatment: A cohort analysis.人工关节置换术后股骨骨折治疗的直接医疗费用:一项队列分析。
Injury. 2021 Dec;52(12):3673-3678. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.054. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
Internal fixation and revision arthroplasty for interprosthetic femoral fractures: a case series of fifty patients.人工关节置换术后股骨骨折的内固定及翻修关节成形术:50例病例系列研究
Int Orthop. 2020 Jul;44(7):1391-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04561-6. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Inter-implant fractures: an unmet medical need-a preventive approach proposal.种植体间骨折:一个未满足的医学需求——预防方法的建议。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):539-543. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02581-6. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
8
Outcomes of neck modularity in total hip arthroplasty: an Italian perspective.全髋关节置换术中颈部模块化的结果:意大利视角
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Dec;103(3):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00589-z. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
9
Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment.人工关节周围骨折:流行病学与当前治疗方法
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2017 May-Aug;14(2):189-196. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.189. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Validation of a new classification system for interprosthetic femoral fractures.一种新型人工关节周围股骨骨折分类系统的验证
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1388-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 20.