Center for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Van Creveldkliniek University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
The Israel National Hemophilia Center & Thrombosis Institute, Sheba Medical Center & The Amalia Biron Thrombosis Research Institute, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Blood Adv. 2024 Jan 23;8(2):369-377. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011442.
Prevention of bleeding and its consequences is the main goal of hemophilia treatment and determines treatment choices for patients who develop inhibitors. To assess bleeding before and during immune tolerance induction (ITI) and its association with ITI regimen and inhibitor titer, we selected and analyzed data on patients receiving high-titer inhibitors from the international prospective PedNet cohort study. In total, 222 patients with severe hemophilia A and inhibitor titers of >5 Bethesda units (BU) were followed from the first positive to the first negative inhibitor result (median overall follow-up, 1.7 years). Mean annual (joint) bleeding rates (AJBR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared according to treatment and inhibitor titer using multivariable negative binomial regression. Before ITI, 115 patients showed an ABR of 6.1 (5.0-7.4) and an AJBR 2.6 (2.1-3.2). Bleeding was independent of inhibitor titer. During ITI, 202 patients had an ABR of 4.4 (3.9-5.1) and an AJBR of 1.7 (1.5-2.0). AJBR during ITI increased with inhibitor titer (hazard ratio [HR] for ≥200 BU vs 5 to 39 BU [4.9; CI, 3.2-7.4]) and decreased with daily ITI infusions (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.6) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate prophylaxis (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.8), whereas ITI dose and recombinant activated factor VII prophylaxis did not independently affect bleeding. These data provide evidence for a protective effect of repeated FVIII infusions (ITI) on bleeding in patients who have developed inhibitors; these data should be used to plan ITI and/or serve as a comparator for prophylaxis with nonreplacement therapy.
预防出血及其后果是血友病治疗的主要目标,也是确定发生抑制剂的患者治疗选择的关键。为了评估免疫耐受诱导(ITI)前后的出血情况及其与 ITI 方案和抑制剂滴度的关系,我们从国际前瞻性 PedNet 队列研究中选择并分析了接受高滴度抑制剂的患者数据。共有 222 例严重血友病 A 患者和抑制剂滴度>5 贝塞斯达单位(BU)的患者,从第一次阳性到第一次阴性抑制剂结果(中位总随访时间为 1.7 年)进行了随访。使用多变量负二项回归,根据治疗和抑制剂滴度比较了 AJBR 的年平均(关节)出血率(AJBR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。在 ITI 之前,115 例患者的 ABR 为 6.1(5.0-7.4),AJBR 为 2.6(2.1-3.2)。出血与抑制剂滴度无关。在 ITI 期间,202 例患者的 ABR 为 4.4(3.9-5.1),AJBR 为 1.7(1.5-2.0)。随着抑制剂滴度的增加,ITI 期间的 AJBR 增加(≥200BU 与 5 至 39BU 的比值比[HR]为 4.9[CI,3.2-7.4]),而随着每日 ITI 输注(HR,0.4[CI,0.3-0.6])或激活的凝血酶原复合物预防(HR,0.4[CI,0.2-0.8]),ITI 剂量和重组活化因子 VII 预防均不能独立影响出血。这些数据为在发生抑制剂的患者中,重复 FVIII 输注(ITI)对出血的保护作用提供了证据;这些数据应被用于规划 ITI,并作为非替代疗法预防的比较。