University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Sweden; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karlstad Business School, Karlstad University, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Feb;342:116571. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116571. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
We study how much regional variation in healthcare spending is driven by place- and patient-specific factors using a random sample of 53,620 regional migrants in Sweden. We find notable differences depending on the category of care, with place-specific factors having a significantly larger impact on specialized outpatient care compared to inpatient and pharmaceutical care. The place effect is estimated to 75% of variation in specialized outpatient care, but 26% or less in variations in inpatient care, and 5% in prescription drug spending. We also find that the empirical estimator has a substantial impact on the estimates of the place-specific effect. The results based on the traditional approach in the literature with two-way fixed effects and event-study models produce much larger estimates of the place-specific effect compared to results based on recently developed heterogeneity-robust models. For total healthcare spending, the traditional two-way fixed effects model estimates a place effect of 78%, while the heterogeneity-robust estimator finds a place effect around 10%. This finding indicates that previous results in this literature, all based on traditional two-way fixed-effects regressions, should be interpreted with care.
我们使用瑞典 53620 名区域移民的随机样本,研究了医疗保健支出的地区差异在多大程度上是由地点和患者特定因素驱动的。我们发现,根据护理类别,存在显著差异,与住院和药品护理相比,特定地点的因素对专科门诊护理的影响要大得多。据估计,专科门诊护理的变化有 75%是由地点因素引起的,而住院护理的变化只有 26%或更少,处方药支出的变化则为 5%。我们还发现,实证估计器对地点特定效应的估计有重大影响。与基于最近开发的异质性稳健模型的结果相比,基于文献中具有双向固定效应和事件研究模型的传统方法的结果产生了更大的地点特定效应估计值。对于总医疗保健支出,传统的双向固定效应模型估计地点效应为 78%,而异质性稳健估计器则发现地点效应约为 10%。这一发现表明,该文献中以前所有基于传统双向固定效应回归的结果都应该谨慎解释。