Suppr超能文献

真脐带结的临床意义:倾向评分匹配研究。

Clinical significance of true umbilical cord knot: a propensity score matching study.

机构信息

Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, 39 Jabotinsky Street, 4941492, Petach Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06249-w.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

True umbilical cord knot (TUCK) is a rare finding that often leads to intensified surveillance and patient anxiety. This study sought to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of TUCK.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary university medical center in 2007-2019. Patients with singleton pregnancies diagnosed postnatally with TUCK were identified and compared to women without TUCK for obstetric and neonatal outcomes using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

TUCK was diagnosed in 780 of the 96,766 deliveries (0.8%). Women with TUCK were older than those without TUCK (32.57 vs. 31.06 years, P < 0.001) and had higher gravidity (3 vs. 2, P < 001) and a higher rate of prior stillbirth (1.76% vs. 0.43%, P < 0.01). Following covariate adjustment, 732 women with TUCK were compared to 7320 matched controls. TUCK was associated with emergency cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate (2.54% vs. 4.35%, P = 0.008, OR 1.71, 95%CI 1.14-2.56) and intrapartum meconium-stained amniotic fluid (19.26% vs. 15.41%, P = 0.022, OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.04-1.65). Neonatal outcomes were comparable except for higher rates of 1-min Apgar score < 7 and neonatal seizures in the TUCK group. The stillbirth rate was higher in the TUCK group, but the difference was not statistically significant (1.23% vs 0.62%, P = 0.06, OR 1.96, 95%CI 0.96-4.03).

CONCLUSIONS

TUCK has several identifiable risk factors. Pregnant women with TUCK may cautiously be informed of the relatively low risks of major obstetric or perinatal complications. The lower occurrence of stillbirth in the TUCK group warrants further study.

摘要

目的

真正的脐带结(TUCK)是一种罕见的发现,往往会导致加强监测和患者焦虑。本研究旨在评估 TUCK 的发生率、危险因素以及产科和新生儿结局。

方法

这是一项 2007 年至 2019 年在一家三级大学医学中心进行的回顾性队列研究。对产后诊断为 TUCK 的单胎妊娠患者进行识别,并与无 TUCK 的女性进行比较,比较产科和新生儿结局采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)。

结果

在 96766 例分娩中,诊断出 TUCK 780 例(0.8%)。与无 TUCK 的女性相比,TUCK 组的女性年龄更大(32.57 岁 vs. 31.06 岁,P < 0.001),孕次更多(3 次 vs. 2 次,P < 0.01),且既往死胎发生率更高(1.76% vs. 0.43%,P < 0.01)。在调整了协变量后,将 732 例 TUCK 患者与 7320 例匹配对照进行比较。TUCK 与因胎心监护不满意而紧急剖宫产分娩有关(2.54% vs. 4.35%,P = 0.008,OR 1.71,95%CI 1.14-2.56),且与产时胎粪污染羊水有关(19.26% vs. 15.41%,P = 0.022,OR 1.31,95%CI 1.04-1.65)。新生儿结局除 TUCK 组 1 分钟 Apgar 评分<7 分和新生儿抽搐的发生率较高外,其他方面无差异。TUCK 组的死胎率较高,但差异无统计学意义(1.23% vs. 0.62%,P = 0.06,OR 1.96,95%CI 0.96-4.03)。

结论

TUCK 有几个可识别的危险因素。TUCK 孕妇可能会被告知相对较低的产科或围产期并发症风险。TUCK 组较低的死产发生率需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ef/10785496/e70073935ed7/12884_2024_6249_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验