Suppr超能文献

160例胎儿脐带绕颈的临床回顾性研究

[A clinical retrospective study on 160 cases of multiple umbilical cord around the neck].

作者信息

Zhang Y Q, Zhao W, Chu K T, Zhao Y, Chen L P, Yu Y, Han X J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 17;98(15):1166-1170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.15.009.

Abstract

To compare the neonatal and maternal outcomes between the patients with umbilical cord around the neck (≥3 loops) and with (1 or 2 loops). A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 160 cases with multiple umbilical cord around the neck (≥3 loops) in the Department of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University between January 2014 and April 2017.For each case, two control women who gave birth at the same day with vertex position and singletons were selected.The neonatal and maternal outcomes were compared. (1) The incidence of cord multiple cord around the neck (≥3 loops) in our hospital was 0.45%. (2) Comparison between groups: The rate of abnormal fetal movement or abnormal cardiotocography in case group was higher than those of the control group, (33.13%, 53/160) vs (8.13%, 26/320), with significant difference, =0.000.The Umbilical Artery Systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio of the case group was lower than that of the control group, 2.00(0.40) vs 2.14(0.40), with significant difference, =0.000.The cesarean section rate of the case group was higher than that of the control group, (81.25%, 130/160) vs (7.50%, 24/320), and the difference was statistically significant, =0.000.Birth Weight of the case group was lower than that of the control group, (3 143±367) g vs (3 323±349) g, with significant difference, =0.000.(3) Comparison between subgroups: The rate of lateral incision or obstetrical forceps in the subgroup of virginal delivery among the case group (=30) was higher than that in the control group (=296), (30.00%, 9/30) vs (12.50%, 37/296), with significant difference, =0.009.While, the Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of the virginal delivery case in the case group were lower than that in the control group, 10(1.25) vs 10(0) and 10(0) vs 10(0), there were both significant difference, =0.000, 0.012, respectively.The rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, 1 min Apgar score of ≤7 and NICU admission were showed no significance, all >0.05.(4) After Logistic regression, the four factors most closely associated with meconium-stained amniotic fluid in patients with multiple cord around the neck (≥3 loops), which were gestational age ≥39 weeks, Birth Weight >3 500 g, umbilical cord around the neck ≥4 loops, and trial of labor. (1) Multiple umbilical cord around the neck (≥3 loops) had a more positive treatment. Vaginal delivery led to lower APGAR score, but didn't increase the incidence of neonatal asphyxia.(2) Independent risk factors for meconium-stained amniotic fluid were gestational age ≥39 weeks, Birth Weight>3 500 g, umbilical cord around the neck ≥4 loops and trial of labor.

摘要

比较脐带绕颈(≥3 圈)与脐带绕颈(1 或 2 圈)患者的新生儿及母体结局。对浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 4 月期间 160 例多圈脐带绕颈(≥3 圈)患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。对于每例患者,选择两名同日分娩、头位且为单胎的对照产妇。比较新生儿及母体结局。(1)我院多圈脐带绕颈(≥3 圈)的发生率为 0.45%。(2)组间比较:病例组胎儿胎动异常或胎心监护异常的发生率高于对照组,(33.13%,53/160)对(8.13%,26/320),差异有统计学意义,P = 0.000。病例组脐动脉收缩压/舒张压(S/D)比值低于对照组,2.00(0.40)对 2.14(0.40),差异有统计学意义,P = 0.000。病例组剖宫产率高于对照组,(81.25%,130/160)对(7.50%,24/320),差异有统计学意义,P = 0.000。病例组出生体重低于对照组,(3143±367)g 对(3323±349)g,差异有统计学意义,P = 0.000。(3)亚组间比较:病例组经阴道分娩亚组(n = 30)侧切或产钳助产的发生率高于对照组(n = 296),(30.00%,9/30)对(12.50%,37/296),差异有统计学意义,P = 0.009。而病例组经阴道分娩病例 1 分钟和 5 分钟 Apgar 评分低于对照组,10(1.25)对 10(0)和 10(0)对 10(0),差异均有统计学意义分别为 P = 0.000、P = 0.012。羊水粪染率、1 分钟 Apgar 评分≤7 及入住新生儿重症监护病房情况差异均无统计学意义,均>0.05。(4)Logistic 回归分析后,多圈脐带绕颈(≥3 圈)患者羊水粪染最密切相关的四个因素为孕周≥39 周、出生体重>3500g、脐带绕颈≥4 圈及试产。(1)多圈脐带绕颈(≥3 圈)有更积极的处理方式。阴道分娩导致 Apgar 评分降低,但未增加新生儿窒息发生率。(2)羊水粪染的独立危险因素为孕周≥39 周、出生体重>3500g、脐带绕颈≥4 圈及试产。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验