Department of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Crit Care. 2024 Jan 12;28(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04794-y.
The "Blood Pressure and Oxygenation Targets in Post Resuscitation Care" (BOX) trial investigated whether a low versus high blood pressure target, a restrictive versus liberal oxygenation target, and a shorter versus longer duration of device-based fever prevention in comatose patients could improve outcomes. No differences in rates of discharge from hospital with severe disability or 90-day mortality were found. However, long-term effects and potential interaction of the interventions are unknown. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to investigate both individual and combined effects of the interventions on 1-year mortality rates.
The BOX trial was a randomized controlled two-center trial that assigned comatose resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients to the following three interventions at admission: A blood pressure target of either 63 mmHg or 77 mmHg; An arterial oxygenation target of 9-10 kPa or 13-14 kPa; Device-based fever prevention administered as an initial 24 h at 36 °C and then either 12 or 48 h at 37 °C; totaling 36 or 72 h of temperature control. Randomization occurred in parallel and simultaneously to all interventions. Patients were followed for the occurrence of death from all causes for 1 year. Analyzes were performed by Cox proportional models, and assessment of interactions was performed with the interventions stated as an interaction term.
Analysis for all three interventions included 789 patients. For the intervention of low compared to high blood pressure targets, 1-year mortality rates were 35% (138 of 396) and 36% (143 of 393), respectively, hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (0.73-1.16) p = 0.47. For the restrictive compared to liberal oxygenation targets, 1-year mortality rates were 34% (135 of 394) and 37% (146 of 395), respectively, HR 0.92 (0.73-1.16) p = 0.46. For device-based fever prevention for a total of 36 compared to 72 h, 1-year mortality rates were 35% (139 of 393) and 36% (142 of 396), respectively, HR 0.98 (0.78-1.24) p = 0.89. There was no sign of interaction between the interventions, and accordingly, no combination of randomizations indicated differentiated treatment effects.
There was no difference in 1-year mortality rates for a low compared to high blood pressure target, a liberal compared to restrictive oxygenation target, or a longer compared to shorter duration of device-based fever prevention after cardiac arrest. No combination of the interventions affected these findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03141099, Registered 30 April 2017.
“复苏后护理中的血压和氧合目标(BOX)”试验研究了低血压目标与高血压目标、限制氧气与自由氧气、以及昏迷患者使用设备预防发热的时间长短(24 小时与 48 小时),这三个干预因素是否会改善预后。研究未发现住院期间严重残疾或 90 天死亡率的差异。然而,长期效果和潜在的干预措施之间的相互作用尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是调查这三种干预措施对 1 年死亡率的单独和联合影响。
BOX 试验是一项随机对照的双中心试验,将院外心脏骤停昏迷复苏的患者随机分配至以下三种干预措施:血压目标为 63mmHg 或 77mmHg;动脉氧合目标为 9-10kPa 或 13-14kPa;设备发热预防,最初 24 小时设定为 36°C,然后设定为 12 小时或 48 小时 37°C;总控温时间为 36 小时或 72 小时。随机分配在平行和同时进行所有干预措施。患者在 1 年内随访所有原因导致的死亡。使用 Cox 比例模型进行分析,并通过将干预措施表示为交互项来评估交互作用。
对所有三种干预措施的分析共纳入 789 例患者。与高血压目标相比,低血压目标组的 1 年死亡率为 35%(138/396),高血压目标组为 36%(143/393),风险比(HR)为 0.92(0.73-1.16),p=0.47。与低氧合目标相比,限制氧气目标组的 1 年死亡率为 34%(135/394),高氧合目标组为 37%(146/395),HR 为 0.92(0.73-1.16),p=0.46。与设备发热预防总时长 36 小时相比,72 小时组的 1 年死亡率为 35%(139/393),72 小时组为 36%(142/396),HR 为 0.98(0.78-1.24),p=0.89。各干预措施之间没有交互作用的迹象,因此,随机分组的任何组合都没有显示出不同的治疗效果。
与高血压目标相比,低血压目标、自由氧气与限制氧气、设备发热预防时间长短(24 小时与 48 小时)对心脏骤停后 1 年死亡率没有影响。这些发现不受干预措施的影响。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03141099,于 2017 年 4 月 30 日注册。