Fu Xiao, Wu Jingfang, Lyu Jihan, Chen Binjun, Wang Wuqing, Chi Fanglu, Yuan Yasheng, Ren Dongdong
Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai clinical medical center of hearing medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Jan 13:1455613231222384. doi: 10.1177/01455613231222384.
Glomus tympanicum tumors are benign primary tumors of the middle ear that can be completely removed using modern surgery. We compared endoscopic ear surgery (EES) to traditional microscopic ear surgery (MES) in terms of the removal of early-stage glomus tympanicum tumors. We retrospectively reviewed 25 cases treated from 2003 to 2021 that were of Grade I or II based on the Glasscock-Jackson classification system. Overall, 18 cases underwent MES: 8 via trans-tympanic bone and 10 via canal-wall-down or canal-wall-up tympanomastoidectomy (CWDT or CWUT) and 7 underwent EES. We compared surgery durations, the lengths and costs of hospitalization, postoperative complications, and relapse rates between the two groups and among the three specific operation ways. The postoperative follow-up period ranged from 1 to 19 years. There was no between-group difference in operative time or the length or cost of hospitalization. Operative time and cost of hospitalization did not show a statistically significant correlation to the three surgical procedures, whereas it was found that the group of MES via the trans-tympanic bone had shorter length of hospitalization when compared with CWUT or CWDT group. All tumors were completely resected; pulsatile tinnitus improved in all patients, and there was no major complication. Two patients who underwent CWUT or CWDT (one each) relapsed; no patient relapsed in the EES group. MES via the trans-tympanic bone and EES via the ear canal safely and reliably remove early-stage tumors without excessive patient discomfort.
鼓室球瘤是中耳的良性原发性肿瘤,可通过现代手术完全切除。我们比较了内镜耳手术(EES)和传统显微镜下耳手术(MES)在早期鼓室球瘤切除方面的效果。我们回顾性分析了2003年至2021年治疗的25例根据格拉斯哥-杰克逊分类系统为I级或II级的病例。总体而言,18例接受了MES:8例经鼓膜骨质手术,10例经开放式或完壁式鼓室乳突切除术(CWDT或CWUT),7例接受了EES。我们比较了两组以及三种具体手术方式之间的手术时长、住院时间和费用、术后并发症及复发率。术后随访时间为1至19年。两组在手术时间、住院时间或费用方面无差异。手术时间和住院费用与三种手术方式之间无统计学显著相关性,然而,发现经鼓膜骨质的MES组与CWUT或CWDT组相比住院时间更短。所有肿瘤均完全切除;所有患者的搏动性耳鸣均有改善,且无重大并发症。两名接受CWUT或CWDT的患者(各1例)复发;EES组无患者复发。经鼓膜骨质的MES和经耳道的EES能安全可靠地切除早期肿瘤,且不会给患者带来过多不适。