Anaesthesia. 2024 Apr;79(4):410-422. doi: 10.1111/anae.16205. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
Remimazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, may be used for induction and maintenance of total intravenous anaesthesia, but its role in the management of patients with multiple comorbidities remains unclear. In this phase 3 randomised controlled trial, we compared the anaesthetic efficacy and the incidence of postinduction hypotension during total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam vs. propofol. A total of 365 patients (ASA physical status 3 or 4) scheduled for elective surgery were assigned randomly to receive total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam (n = 270) or propofol (n = 95). Primary outcome was anaesthetic effect, quantified as the percentage of time with Narcotrend® Index values ≤ 60, during surgery (skin incision to last skin suture), with a non-inferiority margin of -10%. Secondary outcome was the incidence of postinduction hypotensive events. Mean (SD) percentage of time with Narcotrend Index values ≤ 60 during surgery across all patients receiving remimazolam (93% (20.7)) was non-inferior to propofol (99% (4.2)), mean difference (97.5%CI) -6.28% (-8.89-infinite); p = 0.003. Mean (SD) number of postinduction hypotension events was 62 (38.1) and 71 (41.1) for patients allocated to the remimazolam and propofol groups, respectively; p = 0.015. Noradrenaline administration events (requirement for a bolus and/or infusion) were also lower in patients allocated to remimazolam compared with propofol (14 (13.5) vs. 20 (14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients who were ASA physical status 3 or 4, the anaesthetic effect of remimazolam was non-inferior to propofol.
咪达唑仑是一种短效苯二氮䓬类药物,可用于诱导和维持全静脉麻醉,但在合并多种疾病患者的管理中的作用尚不清楚。在这项 3 期随机对照试验中,我们比较了咪达唑仑与丙泊酚用于全静脉麻醉时的麻醉效果和诱导后低血压的发生率。共纳入 365 例(ASA 身体状况 3 或 4 级)择期手术患者,随机分为咪达唑仑组(n=270)或丙泊酚组(n=95)接受全静脉麻醉。主要结局为麻醉效果,用麻醉深度指数(Narcotrend® Index)值≤60 的时间百分比来衡量,手术期间(从切开皮肤到最后缝合皮肤),非劣效性边界为-10%。次要结局为诱导后低血压事件的发生率。所有接受咪达唑仑治疗的患者中,手术期间麻醉深度指数值≤60 的时间百分比的平均值(标准差)为 93%(20.7),不劣于丙泊酚(99%(4.2)),差值的平均值(97.5%置信区间)为-6.28%(-8.89 至无穷大);p=0.003。接受咪达唑仑和丙泊酚治疗的患者中,诱导后低血压事件的平均(标准差)数量分别为 62(38.1)和 71(41.1);p=0.015。与丙泊酚相比,接受咪达唑仑治疗的患者需要去甲肾上腺素给药的事件(推注和/或输注的需求)也较低(分别为 14(13.5)和 20(14.6);p<0.001)。结论:在 ASA 身体状况 3 或 4 级的患者中,咪达唑仑的麻醉效果与丙泊酚相当。