Suppr超能文献

比较瑞马唑仑和依托咪酯全身静脉麻醉对行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者麻醉诱导期间血流动力学的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University Kashihara, Shijo 840, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2024 Jun;38(3):330-338. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03311-x. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

This was a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial set at Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan. We included 36 patients aged ≥ 20 years scheduled to undergo elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) under general anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to the remimazolam and propofol groups (n = 18 each). Remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia was initiated at 12 mg/kg/min or 2.5 mcg/mL via target-controlled infusion, respectively, along with remifentanil. After confirming the loss of consciousness, the administration rate was adjusted using electroencephalographic monitoring. The primary outcome was the rate of arterial hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg, from anesthesia induction until the beginning of the surgical incision. The total doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine were also assessed.

RESULTS

During anesthesia induction, the arterial hypotension rates were 11.9% and 21.6% in the remimazolam and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.01). The total dose of ephedrine was higher in the propofol group (14.4 mg) than in the remimazolam group (1.6 mg) (P < 0.001); however, the total dose of phenylephrine was not significantly different between the two groups (propofol 0.31 mg vs. remimazolam: 0.17 mg, P = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia resulted in a lower hypotension rate than propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during induction in patients undergoing TAVR. Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia can be used safely during anesthetic induction in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉对行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的血流动力学影响。

方法

这是一项在日本奈良医科大学进行的单中心、单盲、随机对照试验。我们纳入了 36 名年龄≥20 岁、拟在全身麻醉下接受经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者。参与者被随机分配到瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚组(每组 18 人)。分别以 12mg/kg/min 或 2.5mcg/mL 通过靶控输注起始瑞马唑仑或丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉,并给予瑞芬太尼。在确认意识丧失后,使用脑电图监测调整给药率。主要结局是麻醉诱导至手术切口开始期间动脉低血压(定义为平均动脉压<60mmHg)的发生率。还评估了麻黄碱和去氧肾上腺素的总剂量。

结果

在麻醉诱导期间,瑞马唑仑组和丙泊酚组的动脉低血压发生率分别为 11.9%和 21.6%(P=0.01)。丙泊酚组的麻黄碱总剂量(14.4mg)高于瑞马唑仑组(1.6mg)(P<0.001);然而,两组间去氧肾上腺素的总剂量无显著差异(丙泊酚 0.31mg 比瑞马唑仑:0.17mg,P=0.10)。

结论

在接受 TAVR 的患者中,与丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉相比,瑞马唑仑全凭静脉麻醉在诱导期间低血压发生率更低。在严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的麻醉诱导中,可以安全使用瑞马唑仑全凭静脉麻醉。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验