• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近期关于皮下引流预防腹部手术后手术部位感染的证据:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Recent evidence for subcutaneous drains to prevent surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ishinuki Tomohiro, Shinkawa Hiroji, Kouzu Keita, Shinji Seiichi, Goda Erika, Ohyanagi Toshio, Kobayashi Masahiro, Kobayashi Motomu, Suzuki Katsunori, Kitagawa Yuichi, Yamashita Chizuru, Mohri Yasuhiko, Shimizu Junzo, Uchino Motoi, Haji Seiji, Yoshida Masahiro, Ohge Hiroki, Mayumi Toshihiko, Mizuguchi Toru

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Surgical Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.

Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Abeno-Ku 545-0051, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):2879-2889. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2879.

DOI:
10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2879
PMID:38222020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784836/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) increase mortality, hospital stays, additional medical treatment, and medical costs. Subcutaneous drains prevent SSIs in gynecological and breast surgeries; however, their clinical impact in abdominal surgery remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate whether subcutaneous drains were beneficial in abdominal surgery using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The database search used PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. The following inclusion criteria were set for the systematic review: (1) Randomized controlled trial studies comparing SSIs after abdominal surgery with or without subcutaneous drains; and (2) Studies that described clinical outcomes, such as SSIs, seroma formation, the length of hospital stays, and mortality.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. The rate of total SSIs was significantly lower in the drained group (54/771, 7.0%) than in the control group (89/759, 11.7%), particularly in gastrointestinal surgery. Furthermore, the rate of superficial SSIs was slightly lower in the drained group (31/517, 6.0%) than in the control group (49/521, 9.4%). No significant differences were observed in seroma formation between the groups. Hospital stays were shorter in the drained group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous drains after abdominal surgery prevented SSIs and reduced hospital stays but did not significantly affect seroma formation. The timing of drain removal needs to be reconsidered in future studies.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSIs)会增加死亡率、住院时间、额外的医疗治疗以及医疗费用。皮下引流可预防妇科和乳腺手术中的手术部位感染;然而,其在腹部手术中的临床影响仍不明确。

目的

通过系统评价和荟萃分析来研究皮下引流在腹部手术中是否有益。

方法

数据库检索使用了PubMed、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆。为该系统评价设定了以下纳入标准:(1)比较腹部手术有或无皮下引流后手术部位感染的随机对照试验研究;(2)描述临床结局的研究,如手术部位感染、血清肿形成、住院时间和死亡率。

结果

八项研究纳入了该荟萃分析。引流组的总手术部位感染率(54/771,7.0%)显著低于对照组(89/759,11.7%),尤其是在胃肠手术中。此外,引流组的浅表手术部位感染率(31/517,6.0%)略低于对照组(49/521,9.4%)。两组之间在血清肿形成方面未观察到显著差异。引流组的住院时间比对照组短。

结论

腹部手术后皮下引流可预防手术部位感染并缩短住院时间,但对血清肿形成无显著影响。未来研究需要重新考虑引流管拔除的时机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/a0343d0ed0fb/WJGS-15-2879-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/7fd1acd1b6c4/WJGS-15-2879-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/c838a955afae/WJGS-15-2879-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/a88f1f0c5ae5/WJGS-15-2879-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/7502bdd07a1a/WJGS-15-2879-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/79114629f153/WJGS-15-2879-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/a0343d0ed0fb/WJGS-15-2879-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/7fd1acd1b6c4/WJGS-15-2879-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/c838a955afae/WJGS-15-2879-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/a88f1f0c5ae5/WJGS-15-2879-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/7502bdd07a1a/WJGS-15-2879-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/79114629f153/WJGS-15-2879-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc0/10784836/a0343d0ed0fb/WJGS-15-2879-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Recent evidence for subcutaneous drains to prevent surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.近期关于皮下引流预防腹部手术后手术部位感染的证据:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):2879-2889. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2879.
2
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 21;10(10):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub3.
3
Utility of prolonged prophylactic systemic antibiotics for wound drains in posterior spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.后路脊柱手术中伤口引流管延长预防性全身应用抗生素的效用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jan 27;38(5):585-594. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.SPINE221218. Print 2023 May 1.
4
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 21(8):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub2.
5
An Optimal Timing for Removing a Drain After Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳腺癌手术后引流管拔除的最佳时机:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Surg Res. 2021 Nov;267:267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
Wound drains following thyroid surgery.甲状腺手术后的伤口引流管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD006099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006099.pub2.
7
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术预防性腹部引流。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 18;12(12):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub5.
8
Subcutaneous suction drains do not prevent surgical site infections in clean-contaminated abdominal surgery-results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.皮下引流管并不能预防清洁污染腹部手术的手术部位感染——系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Sep;404(6):663-668. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01813-x. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
Peri-operative glycaemic control regimens for preventing surgical site infections in adults.用于预防成人手术部位感染的围手术期血糖控制方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD006806. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006806.pub2.
10
A Shakespearean Dilemma in Breast Augmentation: to Use Drains or not? a Systematic Review : Drains in Breast Augmentation.乳房隆乳术中的莎士比亚式困境:使用引流管还是不使用引流管?系统评价:乳房隆乳术中的引流管。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):1553-1566. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02693-7. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
[Prevention and treatment of surgical site infections in abdominal surgery].腹部手术中手术部位感染的预防与治疗
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Apr;96(4):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02242-x. Epub 2025 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
An Optimal Timing for Removing a Drain After Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳腺癌手术后引流管拔除的最佳时机:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Surg Res. 2021 Nov;267:267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.美国疾病预防控制中心 2017 年《手术部位感染预防指南》。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
3
A randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drains for the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after colorectal surgery.
皮下封闭吸引式布雷克引流管预防结直肠手术后手术切口部位感染的随机对照试验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar;32(3):391-398. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2687-2. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.回肠造口术回纳术中皮下引流的必要性(DRASTAR)——一项随机对照双中心试验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):409-18. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1436-x. Epub 2016 May 1.
5
The effect of subcutaneous suction drains on surgical site infection in open abdominal surgery A prospective randomized study.皮下引流管对开放性腹部手术手术部位感染的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:49-55.
6
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
Repair of large incisional hernias. To drain or not to drain. Randomized clinical trial.大型切口疝的修复:引流与否。随机临床试验
Acta Cir Bras. 2015 Dec;30(12):844-51. doi: 10.1590/S0102-865020150120000009.
8
Subcutaneous vacuum drains reduce surgical site infection after primary closure of defunctioning ileostomy.皮下负压引流可降低功能性回肠造口一期关闭术后手术部位感染的发生率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;30(7):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2168-z. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.根据样本量、中位数、极差和/或四分位数间距估算样本均值和标准差。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.
10
Subcutaneous drainage to prevent wound infection in liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.皮下引流预防肝切除术后伤口感染:一项随机对照试验
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Jul;21(7):509-17. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.93. Epub 2014 Feb 12.