Pivazyan Gnel, Khan Ziam, Williams Josef D, Kim Alexander J, Rush Deja M, Cobourn Kelsey D, Patel Nirali, Nair M Nathan
1Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
2University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jan 27;38(5):585-594. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.SPINE221218. Print 2023 May 1.
Closed suction drains, often used after posterior spinal surgery, pose a potential risk of infection. To combat this risk, many surgeons opt for a prolonged prophylactic antibiotic regimen. Since 2015, several studies have shown that prolonged prophylactic systemic antibiotics (PPSA) for drains provides no additional benefit in reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates. However, most of these studies lacked sufficient power to make reliable conclusions. To date, there has been no meta-analysis conducted to further investigate this issue. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a regimen of PPSA reduces the incidence of deep SSIs in adult patients with closed suction drains following posterior spinal surgeries.
The protocol of the current systematic review was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic review of the literature in PubMed (Medline), Europe PMC, Embase, and Cochrane Review databases was conducted for all relevant literature with the keywords "spine," "antibiotics," "surgical site infection," "prophylaxis," and "drain." Retrospective and prospective studies investigating the effectiveness of PPSA in patients 18 years or older who underwent posterior cervical or thoracolumbar surgery and had postoperative wound drains were included. The primary outcome was the odds ratio for deep SSI based on the intervention (PPSA vs non-PPSA). The secondary outcomes were the rates of superficial and overall SSIs.
From a total of 2558 titles identified from the search, 7 studies were chosen for final analysis. Three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 4 were retrospective reviews. A total of 2446 patients were analyzed; 1149 received a PPSA regimen and 1297 received a non-PPSA regimen. Deep SSIs occurred in 45 patients (3.9%) and 46 patients (3.5%) in the PPSA and non-PPSA groups, respectively. The odds ratio for deep SSIs in the PPSA group compared with the non-PPSA group was 1.10 (95% CI 0.69-1.74), which was not statistically significant. Additionally, there were no differences in the rates of superficial and overall SSIs. There was a trend toward increased infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in the PPSA group; however, it was not possible to perform a durable statistical analysis because of the small number of reported organisms in the selected publications.
This meta-analysis demonstrates that there is no reduction in rate of deep, superficial, and overall SSIs with prolonged prophylactic antibiotics after posterior spinal surgery involving the use of closed suction drains.
后路脊柱手术后常用的闭式吸引引流管存在潜在感染风险。为降低此风险,许多外科医生选择延长预防性抗生素疗程。自2015年以来,多项研究表明,延长引流管预防性全身抗生素(PPSA)使用时间在降低手术部位感染(SSI)发生率方面并无额外益处。然而,这些研究大多缺乏足够的统计学效力以得出可靠结论。迄今为止,尚未进行荟萃分析以进一步研究此问题。本研究的目的是调查PPSA方案是否能降低后路脊柱手术后使用闭式吸引引流管的成年患者深部SSI的发生率。
本系统评价方案已在PROSPERO注册。在PubMed(Medline)、欧洲PMC、Embase和Cochrane系统评价数据库中对所有相关文献进行系统检索,关键词为“脊柱”“抗生素”“手术部位感染”“预防”和“引流管”。纳入对18岁及以上接受后路颈椎或胸腰椎手术且术后有伤口引流管的患者使用PPSA有效性的回顾性和前瞻性研究。主要结局是基于干预措施(PPSA与非PPSA)的深部SSI的比值比。次要结局是浅表和总体SSI的发生率。
从检索到的总共2558篇文献标题中,选择7项研究进行最终分析。其中3项为随机对照试验(RCT),4项为回顾性综述。共分析了2446例患者;1149例接受PPSA方案,1297例接受非PPSA方案。PPSA组和非PPSA组分别有45例(3.9%)和46例(3.5%)发生深部SSI。PPSA组与非PPSA组相比,深部SSI的比值比为1.10(95%CI 0.69 - 1.74),无统计学意义。此外,浅表和总体SSI的发生率也无差异。PPSA组多重耐药菌(铜绿假单胞菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)感染有增加趋势;然而,由于所选出版物中报告的微生物数量较少,无法进行持久的统计学分析。
本荟萃分析表明,在涉及使用闭式吸引引流管的后路脊柱手术后,延长预防性抗生素使用时间并不能降低深部、浅表和总体SSI的发生率。