• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病患者强化胰岛素治疗及血糖监测策略后发生低血糖的危险因素。

Risk factors for hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after intensive insulin therapy and blood glucose monitoring strategy.

机构信息

Department of Outpatient, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu Province, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Afr Health Sci. 2023 Jun;23(2):499-508. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i2.58.

DOI:10.4314/ahs.v23i2.58
PMID:38223574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10782344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To explore the risk factors for hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after intensive insulin therapy and the blood glucose monitoring strategy.

METHODS

A total of 172 T2DM patients diagnosed from March 2019 to March 2021 were randomly divided into training (n=115) and test sets (n=57), and given intensive insulin therapy. After treatment, the training set was divided into hypoglycemia (n=35) and non-hypoglycemia groups (n=80). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Then 120 patients were divided into instantaneous scanning glucose test system monitoring (observation) and glucometer monitoring (control) groups. The diagnostic values of the two methods were validated using receiver operator characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Course of disease, body mass index, fasting C-peptide and creatinine were independent risk factors for hypoglycemia, while instantaneous scanning glucose test system monitoring and glucometer monitoring were protective factors (P<0.05). The model had high predictive value. The observation group had shorter time of blood glucose reaching the standard, smaller insulin dose, and lower risk of hypoglycemia than those of the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

During intensive insulin therapy by multiple subcutaneous injections, the clinical effect of instantaneous scanning glucose test system on T2DM patients is better than that of glucometer.

摘要

背景

探讨 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者强化胰岛素治疗后发生低血糖的危险因素及血糖监测策略。

方法

选取 2019 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月本院收治的 172 例 T2DM 患者,随机分为训练集(n=115)和测试集(n=57),均给予强化胰岛素治疗。治疗后,将训练集分为低血糖组(n=35)和非低血糖组(n=80)。对单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析。然后将 120 例患者分为瞬感血糖监测系统监测组(观察组)和血糖仪监测组(对照组),采用受试者工作特征曲线验证两种方法的诊断价值。

结果

病程、体质量指数、空腹 C 肽和肌酐是低血糖的独立危险因素,瞬感血糖监测系统监测和血糖仪监测是保护因素(P<0.05)。该模型具有较高的预测价值。观察组血糖达标时间、胰岛素用量均短于对照组,低血糖风险低于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

在多次皮下注射强化胰岛素治疗时,瞬感血糖监测系统对 T2DM 患者的临床效果优于血糖仪。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after intensive insulin therapy and blood glucose monitoring strategy.2 型糖尿病患者强化胰岛素治疗及血糖监测策略后发生低血糖的危险因素。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Jun;23(2):499-508. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i2.58.
2
Relation Between Hypoglycemia and Glycemic Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Insulin Therapy: A Study Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring.基于连续血糖监测的胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者低血糖与血糖变异性的关系研究
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Feb;20(2):140-146. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0306. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
3
Reduced Glucose Variability With Glucose-Dependent Versus Glucose-Independent Therapies Despite Similar Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia Rates in a Randomized, Controlled Study of Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.在一项针对老年2型糖尿病患者的随机对照研究中,尽管血糖控制和低血糖发生率相似,但与非葡萄糖依赖性疗法相比,葡萄糖依赖性疗法可降低血糖变异性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Nov;12(6):1184-1191. doi: 10.1177/1932296818776993. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
4
Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes--More Common Than You Think: A Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study.2型糖尿病中的低血糖——比你想象的更常见:一项持续血糖监测研究
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 27;9(5):999-1005. doi: 10.1177/1932296815581052.
5
Mitigation of hypoglycemia during Ramadan using the flash glucose monitoring system following dose adjustment of insulin and sulphonylurea in patients taking multiple glucose-lowering therapies (The PROFAST-IT Study).在斋月期间,对接受多种降糖治疗的患者调整胰岛素和磺脲类药物剂量后,使用动态葡萄糖监测系统减轻低血糖症状(PROFAST-IT研究)。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;172:108589. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108589. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
Comparing the effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with multiple daily insulin injection for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus evaluated by retrospective continuous glucose monitoring: A real-world data analysis.通过回顾性连续血糖监测评估连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次胰岛素皮下注射治疗 1 型糖尿病患者的疗效比较:真实世界数据分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;10:990281. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.990281. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of continuous blood glucose measurement with conventional documentation of hypoglycemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injection therapy.2型糖尿病患者多次每日胰岛素注射治疗中连续血糖监测与低血糖传统记录的比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Dec;9(6):483-92. doi: 10.1089/dia.2007.0230.
8
Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose and Hypoglycemia-Related Hospitalization in a Population-Based Cohort of Canadian Patients With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes.基于人群的加拿大 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者队列中自我血糖监测与低血糖相关住院治疗的相关性研究。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Jun;44(4):335-341.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents detected by continuous glucose monitoring: a multi-center prospective observational study in Croatia.多中心前瞻性观察研究:连续血糖监测在口服抗高血糖药物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者中低血糖的检测。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2020 Mar 10;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-0518-5.
10
[Evaluating the feature of hypoglycemia detected by continuous glucose monitoring system during temporary continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 2 diabetes patients].[评估2型糖尿病患者短期持续皮下胰岛素输注期间连续血糖监测系统检测到的低血糖特征]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jun 24;88(24):1679-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Editor's choice: Covid-19 and HIV are still very much with us.编辑推荐:新冠病毒和艾滋病毒仍与我们紧密相伴。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Jun;23(2):i-v. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i2.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes After PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease According to Lesion Location.根据病变位置,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 28;13(24):2825-2836. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.021.
2
Glycemic Metrics Derived From Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.基于间歇性扫描连续血糖监测的血糖指标。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;16(1):113-119. doi: 10.1177/1932296820975822. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
When Low Blood Sugars Cause High Anxiety: Fear of Hypoglycemia Among Parents of Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
当低血糖引起高度焦虑时:1 型糖尿病青少年父母的低血糖恐惧。
Can J Diabetes. 2021 Jul;45(5):403-410.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.08.098. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
4
Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Percutaneous Interventions With Coronary Bypass Surgery: A Meta-analysis.随机临床试验中经皮介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的总体死亡率和死因特异性死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1638-1646. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4748.
5
Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study.缺血性心脏病的全球流行病学:全球疾病负担研究结果
Cureus. 2020 Jul 23;12(7):e9349. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9349.
6
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):94-105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Number and Phenotypic Characteristics.2 型糖尿病对人骨髓基质细胞数量和表型特征的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 2;21(7):2476. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072476.
8
Mortality after drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 7;41(34):3228-3235. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa135.
9
The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.干细胞治疗糖尿病的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Aging Dis. 2020 Feb 1;11(1):141-153. doi: 10.14336/AD.2019.0421. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Clinical outcome comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass surgery in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.糖尿病合并冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与搭桥手术的临床结局比较:一项随机对照试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019 Dec 19;11:110. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0506-y. eCollection 2019.