Suppr超能文献

新型 40μm 光斑尺寸 3050/3200nm DFG 激光与 CO 激光在药物辅助输送中的应用比较。

Novel 40 µm spot size 3050/3200 nm DFG laser versus CO laser for laser-assisted drug delivery.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.

IPG Medical, IPG Photonics Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2024 Feb;56(2):186-196. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23755. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The use of ablative fractional lasers to enhance the delivery of topical drugs through the skin is known as laser-assisted drug delivery. Here, we compare a novel 3050/3200 nm difference frequency generation (DFG) fiber laser (spot size: 40 µm) to a commercially used CO laser (spot size: 120 µm). The objective is to determine whether differences in spot size and coagulation zone (CZ) thickness influence drug uptake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fractional ablation was performed on ex-vivo human abdominal skin with the DFG (5 mJ) and CO (12 mJ) lasers to generate 680 µm deep lesions. To evaluate drug delivery, 30 kDa encapsulated fluorescent dye was topically applied to the skin and histologically analyzed at skin depths of 100, 140, 200, 400, and 600 µm. Additionally, transcutaneous permeation of encapsulated and 350 Da nonencapsulated dye was assessed using Franz Cells.

RESULTS

The DFG laser generated smaller channels (diameter: 56.5 µm) with thinner CZs (thickness: 22.4 µm) than the CO laser (diameter: 75.9 µm, thickness: 66.8 µm). The DFG laser treated group exhibited significantly higher encapsulated dye total fluorescence intensities after 3 h compared to the CO laser treated group across all skin depths (p < 0.001). Permeation of nonencapsulated dye was also higher in the DFG laser treated group vs the CO laser treated group after 48 h (p < 0.0001), while encapsulated dye was not detected in any group.

CONCLUSION

The DFG laser treated skin exhibited significantly higher total fluorescence uptake compared to the CO laser. Additionally, the smaller spot size and thinner CZ of the DFG laser could result in faster wound healing and reduced adverse effects while delivering similar or greater amount of topically applied drugs.

摘要

背景与目的

利用消融性分数激光通过皮肤增强局部药物的递送被称为激光辅助药物递送。在这里,我们将一种新型的 3050/3200nm 差频产生(DFG)光纤激光(光斑大小:40µm)与商业 CO 激光(光斑大小:120µm)进行比较。目的是确定光斑大小和凝固区(CZ)厚度的差异是否会影响药物吸收。

材料与方法

用 DFG(5mJ)和 CO(12mJ)激光对离体人腹部皮肤进行分数消融,以产生 680µm 深的病变。为了评估药物递送,将 30kDa 包裹的荧光染料局部应用于皮肤,并在 100、140、200、400 和 600µm 的皮肤深度进行组织学分析。此外,使用 Franz 细胞评估包裹和 350Da 非包裹染料的经皮渗透。

结果

DFG 激光产生的通道(直径:56.5µm)更小,CZ(厚度:22.4µm)比 CO 激光(直径:75.9µm,厚度:66.8µm)更薄。与 CO 激光治疗组相比,DFG 激光治疗组在所有皮肤深度(p<0.001)的 3 小时后包裹染料总荧光强度明显更高。48 小时后,DFG 激光治疗组的非包裹染料渗透也明显高于 CO 激光治疗组(p<0.0001),而在任何组中都未检测到包裹染料。

结论

与 CO 激光相比,DFG 激光治疗的皮肤显示出明显更高的总荧光摄取。此外,DFG 激光的较小光斑大小和较薄的 CZ 可能导致更快的伤口愈合和减少不良反应,同时递送相似或更大量的局部应用药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验