An Hong, Pires J Chris, Conant Gavin C
MU Bioinformatics and Analytics Core, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jan 16;20(1):e1011803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011803. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Hybridization coupled to polyploidy, or allopolyploidy, has dramatically shaped the evolution of flowering plants, teleost fishes, and other lineages. Studies of recently formed allopolyploid plants have shown that the two subgenomes that merged to form that new allopolyploid do not generally express their genes equally. Instead, one of the two subgenomes expresses its paralogs more highly on average. Meanwhile, older allopolyploidy events tend to show biases in duplicate losses, with one of the two subgenomes retaining more genes than the other. Since reduced expression is a pathway to duplicate loss, understanding the origins of expression biases may help explain the origins of biased losses. Because we expect gene expression levels to experience stabilizing selection, our conceptual frameworks for how allopolyploid organisms form tend to assume that the new allopolyploid will show balanced expression between its subgenomes. It is then necessary to invoke phenomena such as differences in the suppression of repetitive elements to explain the observed expression imbalances. Here we show that, even for phenotypically identical diploid progenitors, the inherent kinetics of gene expression give rise to biases between the expression levels of the progenitor genes in the hybrid. Some of these biases are expected to be gene-specific and not give rise to global differences in progenitor gene expression. However, particularly in the case of allopolyploids formed from progenitors with different genome sizes, global expression biases favoring one subgenome are expected immediately on formation. Hence, expression biases are arguably the expectation upon allopolyploid formation rather than a phenomenon needing explanation. In the future, a deeper understanding of the kinetics of allopolyploidy may allow us to better understand both biases in duplicate losses and hybrid vigor.
杂交与多倍体化,即异源多倍体化,极大地塑造了开花植物、硬骨鱼及其他谱系的进化历程。对近期形成的异源多倍体植物的研究表明,融合形成新异源多倍体的两个亚基因组通常不会平等地表达其基因。相反,两个亚基因组中的一个平均而言会更高水平地表达其旁系同源基因。与此同时,较古老的异源多倍体事件往往在重复基因丢失方面表现出偏向性,两个亚基因组中的一个保留的基因比另一个更多。由于表达降低是重复基因丢失的一条途径,理解表达偏向性的起源可能有助于解释偏向性丢失的起源。因为我们预期基因表达水平会经历稳定选择,所以我们关于异源多倍体生物如何形成的概念框架往往假定新的异源多倍体在其亚基因组之间会表现出平衡表达。那么就有必要援引诸如重复元件抑制差异等现象来解释观察到的表达失衡。在这里我们表明,即使对于表型相同的二倍体亲本,基因表达的内在动力学也会导致杂种中亲本基因表达水平之间出现偏向性。其中一些偏向性预计是基因特异性的,不会导致亲本基因表达的全局差异。然而,特别是在由具有不同基因组大小的亲本形成的异源多倍体的情况下,预计在形成时就会立即出现有利于一个亚基因组的全局表达偏向性。因此,表达偏向性可以说是异源多倍体形成时的预期情况,而不是一种需要解释的现象。未来,对异源多倍体化动力学的更深入理解可能会使我们更好地理解重复基因丢失中的偏向性以及杂种优势。