Seo Hyo Won, Jeon Yeong Jeong, Cho Jong Ho, Kim Hong Kwan, Choi Yong Soo, Zo Jae Ill, Shim Young Mog
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Chest Surg. 2024 Mar 5;57(2):152-159. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.114. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
Anastomotic leakage (AL) following esophagectomy represents a serious complication that often results in prolonged hospitalization and necessitates repeated interventions, including nothing-by-mouth (NPO) restriction, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), or surgical repair. In this study, we evaluated the patterns and outcomes of AL treatment.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at a single center between 2003 and 2020. Of 3,096 examined cases, 181 patients (5.8%) with AL were included in the study: 114 patients (63%) with cervical anastomosis (CA) and 67 (37%) with intrathoracic anastomosis (TA).
The incidence of AL was 11.9% in the CA and 3.2% in the TA group (p<0.001). Among patients with CA who developed AL, 87 (76.3%) were managed with NPO, 15 (13.2%) with EVT, and 12 (10.5%) with surgical repair. Over 90% of patients with cervical AL resumed an oral diet by the time of discharge, regardless of treatment method. Among patients with TA and AL, 36 (53.7%) received NPO, 25 (37.7%) underwent EVT, and 6 (9%) required surgery. Of these, 34 patients who were managed with NPO and 19 with EVT could resume an oral diet. However, only 2 patients who underwent surgery resumed an oral diet, and 2 patients required additional EVT.
Although patients with CA displayed a higher incidence of AL, their rate of successful oral intake exceeded that of those with TA, regardless of treatment method. Among patients exhibiting AL with TA, EVT was more commonly employed than in CA cases, and it appears effective.
食管癌切除术后吻合口漏(AL)是一种严重的并发症,常导致住院时间延长,需要反复干预,包括禁食(NPO)、内镜下真空治疗(EVT)或手术修复。在本研究中,我们评估了AL治疗的模式和结果。
我们回顾性分析了2003年至2020年在单一中心接受食管癌切除术患者的病历。在3096例检查病例中,181例(5.8%)发生AL的患者被纳入研究:114例(63%)为颈部吻合(CA),67例(37%)为胸内吻合(TA)。
CA组AL发生率为11.9%,TA组为3.2%(p<0.001)。在发生AL的CA患者中,87例(76.3%)采用禁食处理,15例(13.2%)采用EVT处理,12例(10.5%)采用手术修复。超过90%的颈部AL患者在出院时恢复经口饮食,无论治疗方法如何。在TA和AL患者中,36例(53.7%)接受禁食,25例(37.7%)接受EVT,6例(9%)需要手术。其中,34例禁食处理的患者和19例接受EVT的患者能够恢复经口饮食。然而,只有2例接受手术的患者恢复经口饮食,2例患者需要额外的EVT。
尽管CA患者的AL发生率较高,但无论治疗方法如何,他们成功经口摄入的比例超过TA患者。在发生TA的AL患者中,EVT的使用比CA病例更普遍,且似乎有效。