Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):1429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50303-0.
To compare the therapeutic effect of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) followed by synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) and traditional intubate-Surfactant-Extubate (InSurE) strategy for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). A single-center, non-randomized and single- blinded study Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit 89 infants enrolled were preterm with gestational age < 36 weeks and clinically diagnosed with neonatal RDS (NRDS) Interventions: 32 infants were assigned to the LISA + SNIPPV group and 57 infants to the InSurE + nCPAP group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the baseline characteristics of the enrolled infants. A lower proportion of infants developed BPD in the LISA + SNIPPV group compared to the InSurE + CPAP group [10 (31.25%) vs. 21 (36.84%), P > 0.05]; however, there was no statistically significant difference. The number needed to treat (NNT) with LISA + SNIPPV to prevent BPD development is 18. The mortality rate was not significant between our study arms [1 (3.13%) vs 2 (3.51%), P > 0.05]. There were no statistically significant differences in the durations (days) of MV [(12.18 ± 13.89) vs. (11.35 ± 11.61), P > 0.05], oxygen therapy [(35.03 ± 19.13) vs. (39.75 ± 17.91), P > 0.05] and re-intubation rates [(0.19 ± 0.40) vs. (0.21 ± 0.45), P > 0.05] between the two study groups. In terms of complications, the incidence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) [24 (75.00%) vs. 27 (47.37%), P < 0.05] was higher and a lower rate of disturbed liver function [1 (3.23%) vs. 19 (33.33%), P < 0.05] were observed in the LISA + SNIPPV group. Acid-base imbalances were reportedly significantly higher in the InSurE group (P < 0.05). No significant differences in other complications were noted. In the interventional group, FiO2 requirements were significantly lower up until the 3rd week of treatment [FiO2 at day 0, (30.75 ± 4.78) vs. (34.66 ± 9.83), P < 0.05; FiO2 at day 21, (25.32 ± 3.74) vs. (29.11 ± 8.17), P < 0.05], as was RSS on days 2 [(0.77 ± 0.38) vs. (1.94 ± 0.75), P < 0.05] and 3 [(0.66 ± 0.33) vs. (1.89 ± 0.82), P < 0.05] after treatment. Additionally, infants in the standard group had a significantly prolonged hospital stay (days) [(45.97 ± 16.93) vs. (54.40 ± 16.26), P < 0.05]. The combination of LISA and SNIPPV for NRDS can potentially lower the rate of BPD, FiO2 demand and shorten the length of hospitalization.
比较经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)联合肺表面活性物质(LISA)与传统气管插管-肺表面活性物质-拔管(InSurE)策略治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的疗效。
这是一项单中心、非随机、单盲的研究。研究对象为胎龄<36 周的早产儿,且临床诊断为 NRDS。将 89 例患儿分为 LISA+NIPPV 组(32 例)和 InSurE+CPAP 组(57 例)。
LISA+NIPPV 组发生支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的比例明显低于 InSurE+CPAP 组[10(31.25%)比 21(36.84%),P>0.05],但差异无统计学意义。LISA+NIPPV 预防 BPD 发生的所需治疗数(NNT)为 18。两组患儿死亡率差异无统计学意义[1(3.13%)比 2(3.51%),P>0.05]。两组患儿机械通气时间[(12.18±13.89)比(11.35±11.61),P>0.05]、氧疗时间[(35.03±19.13)比(39.75±17.91),P>0.05]、再次插管率[(0.19±0.40)比(0.21±0.45),P>0.05]差异无统计学意义。在并发症方面,LISA+NIPPV 组动脉导管未闭(PDA)的发生率[24(75.00%)比 27(47.37%),P<0.05]更高,肝功能障碍发生率[1(3.23%)比 19(33.33%),P<0.05]更低。InSurE 组酸碱失衡发生率显著高于 LISA+NIPPV 组(P<0.05)。其他并发症差异无统计学意义。在干预组中,FiO2 需求在治疗第 3 周显著降低[第 0 天 FiO2:(30.75±4.78)比(34.66±9.83),P<0.05;第 21 天 FiO2:(25.32±3.74)比(29.11±8.17),P<0.05],呼吸窘迫评分(RSS)在第 2 天[(0.77±0.38)比(1.94±0.75),P<0.05]和第 3 天[(0.66±0.33)比(1.89±0.82),P<0.05]也显著降低。此外,标准组患儿的住院时间明显延长[(45.97±16.93)比(54.40±16.26),P<0.05]。LISA 和 NIPPV 联合治疗 NRDS 可降低 BPD 发生率、FiO2 需求,并缩短住院时间。