Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 2024 Apr;51(4):487-498. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13918. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
To assess the 5-year effects of grafting connective tissue while undertaking single immediate implant placement and provisionalization at the mid-buccal mucosa level (MBML). Secondary outcomes were buccal bone wall thickness (BBT), marginal bone level (MBL) and patient satisfaction.
Sixty patients with a single failing tooth in the maxillary anterior region were provided with an immediately placed and provisionalized implant. At implant placement, the patients randomly received either a connective tissue graft from the maxillary tuberosity (n = 30, test group) or no graft (n = 30, control group). The alveolar socket classification was mainly Type 2A. Data were collected before removing the failing tooth (T ), and at 1 (T ), 12 (T ) and 60 (T ) months after final crown placement. The primary outcome was the change in MBML compared with the pre-operative situation. Additionally, the change in BBT, MBL, aesthetics (using the Pink Aesthetic Score-White Aesthetic Score), soft-tissue peri-implant parameters and patient satisfaction were assessed.
At the 5-year follow-up, 27 patients could be analysed from each group. In each group, one implant was lost during the osseointegration period, within 3 months of placement, resulting in an implant survival rate of 96.7% in both groups. MBML change at T was -0.6 (-1.1 to -0.1) mm in the control group and 0.1 (-0.4 to 0.5) mm in the test group (p = .008). BBT and MBL, aesthetics, soft-tissue peri-implant parameters and patient satisfaction showed stable results and satisfied patients, without clinically relevant differences between the groups.
This 5-year follow-up study shows that grafting connective tissue when replacing a single failing tooth with immediately placed and provisionalized implant results in favourable peri-implant tissues and fewer MBML changes.
评估在中颊黏膜水平(MBML)进行即刻种植体放置和临时修复的同时进行结缔组织移植的 5 年效果。次要结果为颊侧骨壁厚度(BBT)、边缘骨水平(MBL)和患者满意度。
60 名上颌前牙区单颗失败牙患者接受即刻放置和临时修复的种植体。在植入物放置时,患者随机接受来自上颌结节的结缔组织移植(n=30,实验组)或不接受移植(n=30,对照组)。牙槽窝分类主要为 2A 型。数据在拔除失败牙前(T )、第 1 个月(T )、第 12 个月(T )和第 60 个月(T )时收集。主要结果是与术前情况相比 MBML 的变化。此外,还评估了 BBT、MBL、美学(使用 Pink Aesthetic Score-White Aesthetic Score)、软组织种植体周围参数和患者满意度的变化。
在 5 年随访时,每个组可分析 27 名患者。在每个组中,一个种植体在植入后 3 个月的骨整合期内丢失,导致两组的种植体存活率均为 96.7%。对照组 T 时 MBML 变化为-0.6(-1.1 至-0.1)mm,实验组为 0.1(-0.4 至 0.5)mm(p=0.008)。BBT 和 MBL、美学、软组织种植体周围参数和患者满意度均表现出稳定的结果,患者满意度高,两组之间无临床相关差异。
这项为期 5 年的随访研究表明,在单颗失败牙即刻放置和临时修复时移植结缔组织可导致种植体周围组织更有利,MBML 变化更少。