• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童跨情境词汇学习中说话者和范例变化的影响。

The effects of speaker and exemplar variability in children's cross-situational word learning.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1650-1660. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02444-6. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-023-02444-6
PMID:38228967
Abstract

Cross-situational word learning (XSWL) - children's ability to learn words by tracking co-occurrence statistics of words and their referents over time - has been identified as a fundamental mechanism underlying lexical learning. However, it is unknown whether children can acquire new words when faced with variable input in XSWL paradigms, such as varying object exemplars and variable speakers. In the present study, we examine the separate and combined effects of exemplar and speaker variability on XSWL in typically developing English-speaking monolingual children. Results revealed that variability in speakers and exemplars did not facilitate or hinder XSWL performance. However, input that varied in both speakers and exemplars simultaneously did hinder children's word learning. Results from this work suggest that XSWL mechanisms may support categorization and generalization beyond word-object associations, but that accommodating multiple forms of variable input may incur costs. Overall, this research provides new theoretical insights into how fundamental mechanisms of word learning scale to more complex and naturalistic forms of input.

摘要

跨情境词汇学习(XSWL)——儿童通过跟踪词汇及其指称随时间的共现统计数据来学习词汇的能力——被认为是词汇学习的基本机制。然而,目前尚不清楚儿童在 XSWL 范式中面对多变的输入时(例如不同的物体范例和不同的说话者)是否能够习得新单词。在本研究中,我们考察了范例和说话者变异性对典型发展的英语单语儿童 XSWL 的单独和综合影响。结果表明,说话者和范例的变异性既没有促进也没有阻碍 XSWL 的表现。然而,同时在说话者和范例上变化的输入确实阻碍了儿童的词汇学习。这项工作的结果表明,XSWL 机制可能支持分类和泛化,超越单词-对象的关联,但适应多种形式的可变输入可能会产生成本。总的来说,这项研究为基本的词汇学习机制如何扩展到更复杂和自然的输入形式提供了新的理论见解。

相似文献

1
The effects of speaker and exemplar variability in children's cross-situational word learning.儿童跨情境词汇学习中说话者和范例变化的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1650-1660. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02444-6. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
The effects of bilingualism on children's cross-situational word learning under different variability conditions.双语对不同变异性条件下儿童跨情境词汇学习的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 May;229:105621. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105621. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
3
Is 10 Better than 1? The Effect of Speaker Variability on Children's Cross-situational Word Learning.十个比一个好吗?说话者变异性对儿童跨情境单词学习的影响。
Lang Learn Dev. 2021;17(4):397-410. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1906680. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Speaker variability, but not bilingualism, influences cross-situational word learning.说话者的变异性而非双语能力会影响跨情境单词学习。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jul;78(7):1450-1460. doi: 10.1177/17470218241277805. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
5
Learning Words in Two Languages: Manipulating Exemplar Variability for Within- and Cross-Language Generalization.在两种语言中学习单词:操纵范例变异性以实现语言内和跨语言的泛化。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Apr 4;65(4):1450-1464. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00350. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
6
Infants Encode Phonetic Detail during Cross-Situational Word Learning.婴儿在跨情境单词学习过程中编码语音细节。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01419. eCollection 2016.
7
Cross-situational statistical word learning in young children.幼儿的跨情境统计性词汇学习
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Oct;126:395-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
Maternal input and lexical development: the case of deaf pre-schoolers.母性输入与词汇发展:以聋学前儿童为例。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):145-63. doi: 10.1080/13682820801973404.
9
When is a word in good company for learning?何时用词是学习的好伙伴?
Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13510. doi: 10.1111/desc.13510. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
10
Surmounting the Tower of Babel: Monolingual and bilingual 2-year-olds' understanding of the nature of foreign language words.克服巴别塔:单语和双语 2 岁儿童对外语词汇本质的理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Mar;119:87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
What Children with Developmental Language Disorder Teach Us About Cross-Situational Word Learning.发展性语言障碍儿童教会我们的跨情境词汇学习。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13094. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13094.
2
Is 10 Better than 1? The Effect of Speaker Variability on Children's Cross-situational Word Learning.十个比一个好吗?说话者变异性对儿童跨情境单词学习的影响。
Lang Learn Dev. 2021;17(4):397-410. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1906680. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Only the right noise? Effects of phonetic and visual input variability on 14-month-olds' minimal pair word learning.
仅正确的声音?语音和视觉输入可变性对 14 个月大婴儿最小对词学习的影响。
Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12950. doi: 10.1111/desc.12950. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
4
Statistical learning of multiple speech streams: A challenge for monolingual infants.多语音流的统计学习:对单语婴儿的挑战。
Dev Sci. 2020 Mar;23(2):e12896. doi: 10.1111/desc.12896. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
5
Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.言语知觉适应中的时间和信息。
Cognition. 2019 Nov;192:103982. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
6
Infants' selective use of reliable cues in multidimensional language input.婴儿在多维语言输入中对可靠线索的选择性使用。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Jan;55(1):1-8. doi: 10.1037/dev0000610. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
Infant sustained attention but not joint attention to objects at 9 months predicts vocabulary at 12 and 15 months.9 个月大的婴儿持续注意力但没有共同注意物体,这预示着 12 个月和 15 个月时的词汇量。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jan;22(1):e12735. doi: 10.1111/desc.12735. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
8
Statistics learned are statistics forgotten: Children's retention and retrieval of cross-situational word learning.学过即忘的统计学:儿童对跨情境单词学习的记忆与提取
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(4):700-711. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000611. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
9
Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items.线性混合效应模型和非独立数据的分析:一种统一的框架,用于分析在个体内和/或个体内变化的分类和连续自变量。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):389-411. doi: 10.1037/met0000159. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Consistent Performance Differences between Children and Adults Despite Manipulation of Cue-Target Variables.尽管对线索-目标变量进行了操纵,但儿童与成人之间仍存在持续的表现差异。
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 3;8:1304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01304. eCollection 2017.