Nguyen Van Cuong, Song Chang Myeon, Ji Yong Bae, Oh Sukjoong, Jeong Jin Hyeok, Tae Kyung
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Head Neck. 2024 Mar;46(3):688-701. doi: 10.1002/hed.27644. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA), concurrently compared with conventional transcervical thyroidectomy (CTT). A network meta-analysis, comprising 23 studies, was performed in this study. The operative time of the CTT group was significantly shorter than that of the TOETVA and TORT groups. The hospital stay of the TOETVA group was significantly longer than that of the CTT group. Rates of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and total complications were higher in association with TOETVA than with TORT. No significant differences were found between the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative pain, and other complications. Cosmetic satisfaction was significantly superior with TORT and TOETVA than with CTT. Compared with CTT, TOETVA and TORT showed superior cosmesis but no significant difference in surgical outcomes except for operative time and hospital stay.
本研究旨在比较经口机器人甲状腺切除术(TORT)和经口内镜甲状腺切除术前庭入路(TOETVA)的手术效果,并与传统经颈甲状腺切除术(CTT)进行对比。本研究进行了一项包含23项研究的网状Meta分析。CTT组的手术时间显著短于TOETVA组和TORT组。TOETVA组的住院时间显著长于CTT组。与TORT相比,TOETVA的暂时性喉返神经麻痹发生率和总并发症发生率更高。三组在术中出血量、回收淋巴结数量、术后疼痛及其他并发症方面未发现显著差异。TORT和TOETVA的美容满意度显著优于CTT。与CTT相比,TOETVA和TORT的美容效果更佳,但除手术时间和住院时间外,手术效果无显著差异。