Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Transdisciplinary Department of Medicine and Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):1773-1781. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01623-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT). We carried out a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar on studies comparing TOETVA and TORT until January 2023. A total of five articles published between 2018 and 2023 that matched the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies included 641 patients (394 TOETVA patients and 247 TORT patients). TOETVA group was associated with a significantly shorter operative time with a mean difference of 60.08 min [95% confidence interval (CI) - 83.95 to - 36.20; P < 0.001). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was more common in the TOETVA group than the TORT group (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.14-7.88; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the other outcomes, including the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scores, number of central lymph nodes retrieved, permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, and transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism. The TOETVA group was associated with shorter operative time and more transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy than the TORT group. Each procedure has its benefits and limitations. The surgical approach should be determined by considering the patient's characteristics and preferences, as well as the surgeon's preference and area of expertise.
本研究旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较经口内镜甲状腺切除术(TOETVA)和经口机器人甲状腺切除术(TORT)的手术结果。我们对 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统的文献检索,检索比较 TOETVA 和 TORT 的研究,检索时间截至 2023 年 1 月。共有 5 篇发表于 2018 年至 2023 年的符合纳入标准的研究被纳入系统评价和荟萃分析。这些研究共纳入 641 例患者(394 例 TOETVA 患者和 247 例 TORT 患者)。TOETVA 组的手术时间明显更短,平均差异为 60.08 分钟[95%置信区间(CI)-83.95 至-36.20;P<0.001]。TOETVA 组暂时性喉返神经麻痹的发生率高于 TORT 组(OR 3.00;95%CI 1.14-7.88;P=0.03)。其他结果,包括住院时间、术后疼痛评分、中央淋巴结检出数量、永久性喉返神经损伤、暂时性和永久性甲状旁腺功能减退,两组间无显著差异。TOETVA 组的手术时间短于 TORT 组,暂时性喉返神经麻痹的发生率高于 TORT 组。每种手术方法都有其优点和局限性。手术方法应根据患者的特点和偏好,以及外科医生的偏好和专业领域来确定。