• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国胸肌前和胸肌下乳房重建的现状

Current status prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in the USA.

作者信息

Piccolo Paulo P, Venturi Mark, Mesbahi Alex N, Nahabedian Maurice Y

机构信息

National Center for Plastic Surgery, McLean, VA, USA.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1794-1805. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-279. Epub 2023 Dec 22.

DOI:10.21037/gs-23-279
PMID:38229837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10788577/
Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women in the United States. In the setting of a mastectomy, implant-based reconstruction (IBR) remains the most common type of breast reconstruction performed. IBR is typically performed in two-stages (tissue expander - implant) or one stage [direct-to-implant (DTI)]. As a consequence of the limitations associated with submuscular placement of implants, prepectoral implant placement has been gaining more acceptance worldwide. The prepectoral plane eliminates the need for chest wall muscle dissection, disinsertion and manipulation avoiding the muscle related complications of the subpectoral approach such as increased pain, spasm and animation deformity. In addition, prepectoral placement shortens the recovery time and provides greater control of breast shape and contour. With the latest generation form-stable silicone implants coupled with the wide use and acceptance of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and other meshes to support the implant, this technique is becoming the mainstay of implant-based reconstruction, under these circumstances the subpectoral technique will continue to be the benchmark to which the prepectoral technique will be compared to. The authors sought to review the literature emanating from North America that pertains to this topic and provide an up-to-date assessment of the current practices of the prepectoral and submuscular technique.

摘要

乳腺癌仍然是美国女性中最常被诊断出的癌症。在乳房切除术的情况下,基于植入物的乳房重建(IBR)仍然是最常见的乳房重建类型。IBR通常分两阶段进行(组织扩张器 - 植入物)或一阶段进行[直接植入(DTI)]。由于与植入物胸肌下放置相关的局限性,胸肌前植入物放置在全球范围内越来越被接受。胸肌前平面消除了对胸壁肌肉进行解剖、离断和操作的需要,避免了胸肌下植入途径的肌肉相关并发症,如疼痛加剧、痉挛和动态畸形。此外,胸肌前放置缩短了恢复时间,并能更好地控制乳房形状和轮廓。随着最新一代形状稳定的硅酮植入物,以及脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)和其他网片被广泛使用和接受以支撑植入物,在这种情况下,该技术正成为基于植入物的乳房重建的主流方法,在此背景下,胸肌下技术仍将是与胸肌前技术进行比较的基准。作者试图回顾来自北美的有关该主题的文献,并对胸肌前和胸肌下技术的当前实践提供最新评估。

相似文献

1
Current status prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in the USA.美国胸肌前和胸肌下乳房重建的现状
Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1794-1805. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-279. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.胸大肌前与胸大肌下入路即刻乳房重建的比较。
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Mar;84(3):263-270. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059.
3
Prepectoral versus subpectoral two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: U.S. medical center experience and narrative review.胸大肌前与胸大肌下两阶段植入式乳房重建:美国医疗中心经验及叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):411. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1094. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.脱细胞真皮基质保留的直接置管胸肌前置乳房重建:包括成本分析的对比研究。
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;84(2):139-143. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001997.
5
Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.患者选择的考量因素:胸大肌前与胸大肌下植入式乳房重建
Arch Plast Surg. 2019 Nov;46(6):550-557. doi: 10.5999/aps.2019.00353. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
6
Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.胸前区修复性乳房重建治疗假体相关动态畸形:102例重建病例回顾
Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Apr 6;38(5):519-526. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx261.
7
Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Implant Placement.一期直接植入式乳房重建:胸大肌下与胸大肌前植入假体的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;84(4):361-365. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002028.
8
Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于胸大肌前和胸大肌下植入物的乳房重建的生活质量、疼痛及成本探讨:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Aug;75(8):2550-2560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
9
Revision Breast Reconstruction with Prepectoral Pocket Conversion of Submuscular Breast Implants.胸大肌下乳房假体的胸肌前口袋转换行乳房修复术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):743e-748e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007885.
10
A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.经乳晕保留乳房切除术的胸肌前与胸肌后乳房重建术后晚期并发症的批判性评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9150-9158. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10085-z. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes, indications and predictive factors for complications in postmastectomy prepectoral reconstructions with polyurethane foam-coated implants.采用聚氨酯泡沫涂层植入物进行乳房切除术后胸大肌前重建的并发症的结局、适应症及预测因素
Breast. 2025 Jun 26;83:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104520.
2
Oncological Safety of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Conservative Mastectomy: Insights from 842 Consecutive Breast Cancer Patients.保乳切除术后胸前植入式乳房重建的肿瘤学安全性:来自842例连续乳腺癌患者的见解
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 8;17(6):925. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060925.
3
Comparison of Postoperative Breast Asymmetry Using Vectra 3D Imaging in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.使用Vectra 3D成像技术对比胸前区与胸肌下植入式乳房重建术后的乳房不对称情况
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 9;13(23):7486. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237486.
4
Three and twelve-month analysis of the PROM-Q study: comparison of patient-reported outcome measures using the BREAST-Q questionnaire in pre- vs. sub-pectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.PROM-Q 研究的 3 个月和 12 个月分析:使用 BREAST-Q 问卷在假体置入即刻乳房重建的胸肌前 vs. 胸肌下比较患者报告的结局测量指标。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(2):275-282. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07416-5. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Subpectoral Implant Placement Is Not Protective against Postmastectomy Radiotherapy-Related Complications Compared to Prepectoral Placement.胸肌下植入物的放置并不能预防与乳腺癌根治术后放疗相关的并发症,与胸肌前放置相比。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jan 1;153(1):24-33. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010489. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
Air versus Saline in Initial Prepectoral Tissue Expansion: A Comparison of Complications and Perioperative Patient-Reported Outcomes.经胸预置扩张中空气与盐水的比较:并发症和围手术期患者报告结局的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Oct 1;152(4S):25S-34S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010478. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Timeline and Incidence of Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral, Dual-Plane, and Total Submuscular Alloplastic Reconstruction With and Without Biosynthetic Scaffold Usage.假体置入胸大肌下、双平面和全肌下重建术,应用和不应用生物合成支架术后并发症的时间进程和发生率。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S466-S471. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003482. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 694 Two-Stage Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstructions.694 例胸肌前与胸肌下两阶段乳房重建术的手术和患者报告结局。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Oct 1;152(4S):43S-54S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010380. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
No Differences in Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes among AlloDerm, SurgiMend, and Dermacell for Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.对于基于胸大肌前植入物的乳房重建,AlloDerm、SurgiMend和Dermacell在手术及患者报告结局方面无差异。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 May 1;151(5):719e-729e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010070. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
6
Evaluation of the Safety of a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm Construct in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.GalaFLEX-AlloDerm组合体在前胸乳房重建中的安全性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Oct 1;150:75S-81S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009520. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
Picking the Right Plane: A Comparison of Total Submuscular, Dual-Plane, and Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.选择合适的植入方式:全肌下、双平面和胸大肌前植入物乳房重建的比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):737e-746e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009537. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
8
Oncologic Safety of Staged Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Mean 9-Year Follow-Up.分期胸肌前置假体重建保乳术后乳房:平均 9 年随访的肿瘤安全性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Sep 1;150(3):513-522. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009479. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
Air versus Saline: The Effect of Tissue Expander Fill on Outcomes of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.空气与盐水:组织扩张器填充对胸肌前乳房重建结果的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jul 1;150(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009191. Epub 2022 May 2.
10
Impact of Dermal Matrix Brand in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.真皮基质品牌对基于假体的乳房重建结果的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jul 1;150(1):17-25. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009178. Epub 2022 May 2.