Rosello Jimenez Jan Raffael, Fuchs Florian, Schmohl Leonie, Schulz-Siegmund Michaela, Koenig Andreas
Department of Prosthodontics and Material Sciences, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Private Practice, Zahnarztpraxis Jan Rosello, 04654 Frohburg, Germany.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Nov 29;15(23):4574. doi: 10.3390/polym15234574.
Three-dimensional (3D)-printed occlusal splints are becoming more prevalent in the treatment of tooth substance loss due to their fast and cost-effective production. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate whether the mechanical properties (tensile strength-TS, modulus of elasticity in tension-ME, and Vickers hardness-HV) vary between the materials (printed dimethacrylate-based resins: Keyprint KeySplint soft-KEY, Luxaprint Ortho Plus-LUX, V-Print splint-VPR, printed methacrylate-based resins Freeprint splint 2.0-FRE, and milled methacrylate-based material, CLEAR splint-CLE), and the influence of aging processes (extraoral storage conditions and nightly or daily use) was examined. The printed methacrylate-based resins (FRE, LUX, and VPR) had much higher TS (43.7-48.5 MPa compared to 12.3-13.3 MPa), higher ME (2.01-2.37 GPa compared to 0.43-0.72 GPa), and higher HV (11.8-15.0 HV compared to 3.3-3.5 HV) than both of the methacrylate-based resins (KEY and CLE) after the production process. Although the TS, ME, and HV of the printed dimethacrylate resins (FRE, LUX, and VPR) decreased significantly under humid conditions with possibly elevated temperatures (thermocycling as well as 37 °C), these mechanical properties were significantly higher than both methacrylate-based resins (KEY and CLE). Therefore, printed dimethacrylate resins should be used rather than methacrylate-based resins for high expected masticatory forces, low wall thicknesses, or very long wearing times (≥6 months).
由于三维(3D)打印咬合板生产快速且经济高效,其在牙齿物质丧失的治疗中越来越普遍。本体外研究的目的是调查材料(3D打印的二甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂:Keyprint KeySplint soft-KEY、Luxaprint Ortho Plus-LUX、V-Print夹板-VPR、3D打印的甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂Freeprint夹板2.0-FRE以及铣削的甲基丙烯酸酯基材料CLEAR夹板-CLE)之间的机械性能(拉伸强度-TS、拉伸弹性模量-ME和维氏硬度-HV)是否存在差异,并研究老化过程(口外储存条件以及夜间或每日使用)的影响。与两种甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂(KEY和CLE)相比,3D打印的甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂(FRE、LUX和VPR)在生产过程后的TS(分别为43.7-48.5MPa和12.3-13.3MPa)、ME(分别为2.01-2.37GPa和0.43-0.72GPa)和HV(分别为11.8-15.0HV和3.3-3.5HV)要高得多。尽管在可能温度升高的潮湿条件下(热循环以及37°C),3D打印的二甲基丙烯酸酯树脂(FRE、LUX和VPR)的TS、ME和HV显著降低,但这些机械性能仍显著高于两种甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂(KEY和CLE)。因此,对于预期咀嚼力高、壁厚薄或佩戴时间很长(≥6个月)的情况,应使用3D打印的二甲基丙烯酸酯树脂而非甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂。