• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镓-DOTA.SA.FAPi 作为一种用于多种上皮性恶性肿瘤的多功能诊断探针:与 F-FDG 的头对头比较。

Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi as a Versatile Diagnostic Probe for Various Epithelial Malignancies: A Head-to-Head Comparison with F-FDG.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (S.C., Y.M., N.R., H.S., R.K., J.S., B.R.M.).

Department of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (F.R., E.S.M.).

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2024 Jun;31(6):2521-2535. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.002. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.002
PMID:38233261
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts has been a major breakthrough causing a paradigm shift in targeted theranostics focusing on the tumor microenvironment. In this study, a squaric acid derivative DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi) has been evaluated as a potential diagnostic probe in diverse epithelial cancers and compared to the standard-of-care F-FDG.

METHODS

25 patients enrolled in this prospective study underwent F-FDG and Ga-SA.FAPi PET scans on two different days. For biodistribution, standardized uptake values (SUV) were computed by delineating region-of-interest on various body organs. For comparative analysis in disease identification, lesion tracer uptake was quantified using SUVs corrected for lean body mass (SUL), SUV, tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) with liver and blood pool as the reference, total lesion glycolysis (TLG for F-FDG) and total lesion FAP expression (TLF for Ga-SA.FAPi).

RESULTS

25 patients (mean age: 58 ± 8 years) with four types of cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 56% of cohort), gall bladder carcinoma (GB Ca, 12%), adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC, 16%), and breast carcinoma (breast Ca, 16%) were prospectively evaluated. Physiological tracer uptake of Ga-SA.FAPi was noted in the salivary glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas, muscles and kidneys with variable uptake in the lacrimal glands, extra-ocular muscles, oral mucosa and uterus. Lesion-based comparative analysis between both the radiotracers demonstrated complete concordant findings in detection of all primary lesions and distant metastases in liver, bones, adrenals and peritoneum whereas discordant findings were noted in lung nodules (20%) and lymph nodes (13%). In overall analysis, Ga-SA.FAPi exhibited significantly higher SUV (10.3 vs 8.8, p-0.019), SUL (6.8 vs 4.9, p-0.000) and SUL (5.4 vs 4.1, p-0.019) in comparison to F-FDG whereas TBR was comparable for both the tracers [TBR: median 1.9 (IQR: 2.6-1.4) vs 1.8 (2.6-1.1), p-0.275; TBR: 2.1 (3.7-1.4) vs 2.0 (2.7-1.4), p-0.207]. In subcategorical analysis, Ga-SA.FAPi demonstrated higher SUV, SUL and SUL values for primary disease (SUV: 14.8 (18.7-9.7) vs (12.9-6.6), p-0.087; SUL: 8.2 (11.2-6.8) vs 6.3 (8.5-4.4), p-0.037; SUL: 6.9 ± 2.5 vs 5.1 ± 2.2, p-0.023] and distant metastases (8.8 vs 7.2, p-0.038); 6.3 (8.8-4.4) vs 3.6 (4.4-2.0), p-0.000; 5.4 vs 3.5, p-0.000] whereas comparable values were noted for both the tracers in nodal metastases [9 (13.5-4.1) vs 8 (12.7-4.7), p-0.726; 4.5 (6.2-1.8) vs 4.3 (5.7-2.2), p-0.727; 4.1 ± 2.3 vs 3.7 ± 1.8, p-0.129]. In primary disease, highest Ga-SA.FAPi avidity was noted in ACC followed by GB Ca and HCC. In distant metastases, gall bladder, lung and skeletal lesions demonstrated higher Ga-SA.FAPi avidity. Moreover, Ga-SA.FAPi identified five additional lung lesions which were missed by F-FDG in one case of ACC.

CONCLUSION

Ga-SA.FAPi emerged as an effective, versatile diagnostic probe for imaging various epithelial malignancies similar to F-FDG.

摘要

背景与目的

成纤维细胞激活蛋白(FAP)在表达癌症相关成纤维细胞的研究中取得了重大突破,促使针对肿瘤微环境的靶向治疗发生了范式转变。在这项研究中,一种新型的方酸衍生物 DOTA.SA.FAPi(SA.FAPi)已被评估为一种有潜力的诊断探针,可用于多种上皮癌,并与标准的 F-FDG 进行比较。

方法

25 名患者参与了这项前瞻性研究,在两天内接受了 F-FDG 和 Ga-SA.FAPi PET 扫描。为了进行生物分布分析,通过勾画各器官的感兴趣区域,计算标准化摄取值(SUV)。为了进行疾病识别的对比分析,使用 SUV 校正后的瘦体重(SUL)、SUV、肿瘤与背景比(TBR),以肝和血池为参照,总病灶糖酵解(TLG 用于 F-FDG)和总病灶 FAP 表达(TLF 用于 Ga-SA.FAPi)来量化病变示踪剂摄取。

结果

25 名患者(平均年龄:58±8 岁),包括 4 种类型的癌症,包括肝细胞癌(HCC,占队列的 56%)、胆囊癌(GB Ca,占 12%)、肾上腺皮质癌(ACC,占 16%)和乳腺癌(breast Ca,占 16%),前瞻性地进行了评估。Ga-SA.FAPi 在唾液腺、甲状腺、肝脏、胰腺、肌肉和肾脏中显示出生理性示踪剂摄取,在泪腺、眼外肌、口腔黏膜和子宫中摄取量不同。两种放射性示踪剂的基于病变的对比分析显示,在检测肝、骨、肾上腺和腹膜的所有原发性病变和远处转移方面,两种示踪剂的结果完全一致,而在肺结节(20%)和淋巴结(13%)方面的结果不一致。总的来说,与 F-FDG 相比,Ga-SA.FAPi 显示出更高的 SUV(10.3 比 8.8,p-0.019)、SUL(6.8 比 4.9,p-0.000)和 SUL(5.4 比 4.1,p-0.019),而 TBR 两种示踪剂之间无差异[TBR:中位数 1.9(IQR:2.6-1.4)比 1.8(2.6-1.1),p-0.275;TBR:2.1(3.7-1.4)比 2.0(2.7-1.4),p-0.207]。在亚分类分析中,Ga-SA.FAPi 在原发性疾病(SUV:14.8(18.7-9.7)比(12.9-6.6),p-0.087;SUL:8.2(11.2-6.8)比 6.3(8.5-4.4),p-0.037;SUL:6.9±2.5 比 5.1±2.2,p-0.023)和远处转移(SUV:8.8 比 7.2,p-0.038;SUL:6.3(8.8-4.4)比 3.6(4.4-2.0),p-0.000;SUL:5.4 比 3.5,p-0.000)中显示出更高的 SUV、SUL 和 SUL 值,而在淋巴结转移中,两种示踪剂的结果相似[9(13.5-4.1)比 8(12.7-4.7),p-0.726;4.5(6.2-1.8)比 4.3(5.7-2.2),p-0.727;4.1±2.3 比 3.7±1.8,p-0.129]。在原发性疾病中,ACC 中的 Ga-SA.FAPi 摄取最高,其次是胆囊癌和肝细胞癌。在远处转移中,胆囊、肺和骨骼病变显示出更高的 Ga-SA.FAPi 摄取。此外,Ga-SA.FAPi 在一名 ACC 患者中还发现了 5 个额外的 F-FDG 漏诊的肺部病变。

结论

Ga-SA.FAPi 作为一种有效的、多功能的诊断探针,可用于成像多种上皮恶性肿瘤,与 F-FDG 相似。

相似文献

1
Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi as a Versatile Diagnostic Probe for Various Epithelial Malignancies: A Head-to-Head Comparison with F-FDG.镓-DOTA.SA.FAPi 作为一种用于多种上皮性恶性肿瘤的多功能诊断探针:与 F-FDG 的头对头比较。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Jun;31(6):2521-2535. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.002. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, dosimetry of [Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi, and the head-to-head comparison with [F]F-FDG PET/CT in patients with various cancers.[Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi 的生物分布、药代动力学、剂量学,以及与不同癌症患者的 [F]F-FDG PET/CT 的头对头比较。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jun;48(6):1915-1931. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05132-y. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
3
Exploring currently available fibroblast activation protein targeting molecules in adrenocortical carcinoma: Navigating theranostic pathways.探索肾上腺皮质癌中目前可用的成纤维细胞活化蛋白靶向分子:探寻诊疗途径。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07203-4.
4
Head-to-head comparison of [Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi with [F]F-FDG PET/CT in radioiodine-resistant follicular-cell derived thyroid cancers.[Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi 与 [F]F-FDG PET/CT 对头对头比较在放射性碘难治性滤泡细胞来源的甲状腺癌中的应用。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Dec;51(1):233-244. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06404-z. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
5
Head-to-Head Comparison of [Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [Ga]Ga-DOTANOC Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging for the Follow-Up Surveillance of Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer.用于监测甲状腺髓样癌患者的[Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi 和 [Ga]Ga-DOTANOC 正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描成像的头对头比较。
Thyroid. 2023 Aug;33(8):974-982. doi: 10.1089/thy.2023.0008. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Head-to-head Intra-individual Comparison of [Ga]-FAPI and [F]-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Bladder Cancer.膀胱癌患者 [Ga]-FAPI 与 [F]-FDG PET/CT 的头对头个体内比较。
Mol Imaging Biol. 2022 Aug;24(4):651-658. doi: 10.1007/s11307-022-01715-3. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
7
The potential utility of [ Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 as a novel broad-spectrum oncological and non-oncological imaging agent-comparison with [F]FDG.[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 作为一种新型广谱肿瘤和非肿瘤成像剂的潜在应用——与[18F]FDG 比较。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Feb;49(3):963-979. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05522-w. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Head-to-head comparison of [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [F]FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of tonsil cancer and lymph node metastases: a single-centre retrospective study.头对头比较 [Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 和 [F]FDG PET/CT 用于评估扁桃体癌和淋巴结转移:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 May 3;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00699-3.
9
PET Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Various Types of Cancer Using Ga-FAP-2286: Comparison with F-FDG and Ga-FAPI-46 in a Single-Center, Prospective Study.使用 Ga-FAP-2286 对多种癌症中的成纤维细胞激活蛋白进行 PET 成像:在单中心前瞻性研究中与 F-FDG 和 Ga-FAPI-46 的比较。
J Nucl Med. 2023 Mar;64(3):386-394. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264544. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
10
Head-to-head comparison of F-FDG and Ga-FAPI PET/CT in common gynecological malignancies.¹⁸F-FDG与⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT在常见妇科恶性肿瘤中的头对头比较。
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00843-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted radionuclide therapy for patients with central nervous system metastasis: Overlooked potential?中枢神经系统转移患者的靶向放射性核素治疗:被忽视的潜力?
Neuro Oncol. 2024 Dec 9;26(Supplement_9):S229-S241. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae192.