Liu Alice, Chan Eddie, Madigan Victoria, Leung Vivian, Dosvaldo Lucille, Sherry Norelle, Howden Benjamin, Bond Katherine, Marshall Caroline
Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Microbiology Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 12;4(1):e7. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.529. eCollection 2024.
infection (CDI) is the commonest cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea and undergoes standardized surveillance and mandatory reporting in most Australian states and territories. Historically attributed to nosocomial spread, local and international whole genome sequencing (WGS) data suggest varied sources of acquisition. This study describes genotypes isolated at a tertiary center in Melbourne, Australia, their likely source of acquisition, and common risk factors.
Retrospective observational study.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), a 570-bed tertiary center in Victoria, Australia.
Short-read whole genome sequencing was performed on 75 out of 137 isolates obtained from 1/5/2021 to 28/2/2022 and compared to previous data from 8/11/2015 to 1/11/2016. Existing data from infection control surveillance and electronic medical records were used for epidemiological and risk factor analysis.
Eighty-five (62.1%) of the 137 cases were defined as healthcare-associated from epidemiological data. On genome sequencing, 33 different multi-locus sequence type (MLST) subtypes were identified, with changes in population structure compared to the 2015-16 period. Risk factors for CDI were present in 130 (94.9%) cases, including 108 (78.8%) on antibiotics, 86 (62.8%) on acid suppression therapy, and 25 (18.2) on chemotherapy.
In both study periods, most isolates were not closely related, suggesting varied sources of acquisition and that spread of within the hospital was unlikely. Current infection control precautions may therefore warrant review. Underlying risk factors for CDI were common and may contribute to the proportion of healthcare-associated infections in the absence of proven hospital transmission.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是医疗保健相关腹泻最常见的原因,在澳大利亚大多数州和领地都要接受标准化监测和强制报告。历史上认为其是由医院传播引起的,但本地和国际全基因组测序(WGS)数据表明其感染源多种多样。本研究描述了在澳大利亚墨尔本一家三级中心分离出的基因型、其可能的感染源以及常见风险因素。
回顾性观察研究。
澳大利亚维多利亚州一家拥有570张床位的三级中心——皇家墨尔本医院(RMH)。
对2021年5月1日至2022年2月28日期间从137株分离菌中选取的75株进行短读长全基因组测序,并与2015年11月8日至2016年11月1日的先前数据进行比较。利用感染控制监测的现有数据和电子病历进行流行病学及风险因素分析。
根据流行病学数据,137例病例中有85例(62.1%)被定义为医疗保健相关感染。基因组测序鉴定出33种不同的多位点序列类型(MLST)亚型,与2015 - 2016年期间相比,种群结构有所变化。130例(94.9%)病例存在CDI的风险因素,包括108例(78.8%)正在使用抗生素、86例(62.8%)正在接受抑酸治疗以及25例(18.2%)正在接受化疗。
在两个研究期间,大多数分离菌关系不密切,这表明感染源多种多样,且艰难梭菌在医院内传播的可能性不大。因此,当前的感染控制预防措施可能需要重新审视。CDI的潜在风险因素很常见,在没有确凿的医院内传播证据的情况下,可能导致了医疗保健相关感染的比例。