Nakla Andrew P, Shin Steven S, Kwak Daniel, Chung Min-Shik, McGarry Michelle H, Lee Thay Q
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2025 Sep;20(6):931-937. doi: 10.1177/15589447231222565. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
The purpose of this study was to compare the cyclic and load to failure characteristics of post-trapeziectomy suspensionplasty with the FiberLock Suspension System (FLSS; Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) to flexor carpi radialis ligament reconstruction (FCRLR). We hypothesized that the FLSS will have increased stiffness, yield, and ultimate load compared with FCRLR.
Ten matched pairs of cadaveric hands were used. One side of each pair was randomly assigned to receive the FCRLR or FLSS and the contralateral side received the other suspensionplasty. A complete trapeziectomy was performed followed by FLSS or FCRLR. Cyclic and load to failure characteristics were measured with loading in the distal to proximal direction. A preload of 1 N with 30 cycles of 1 N to 10 N was applied, followed by load to failure. A paired test was used for statistical analysis ( < .05).
The FLSS had significantly decreased nonrecoverable deformation and deformation at peak load during cyclic loading ( < .04). The FLSS also had significantly increased stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and load and energy absorbed at 10 mm displacement compared with FCRLR ( < .04). All 10 FCRLR specimens failed with suture tearing through the tendon. Nine FLSS specimens failed due to suture slipping from the SwiveLock anchor (Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) and 1 failed due to the FiberTak anchor (Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) pulling through the index metacarpal.
Suspensionplasty with the FLSS demonstrated greater structural integrity compared with FCRLR following trapeziectomy. The FLSS procedure may result in decreased thumb subsidence and decreased construct failure.
本研究的目的是比较采用FiberLock悬吊系统(FLSS;Arthrex公司,佛罗里达州那不勒斯)的大多角骨切除术后悬吊成形术与桡侧腕屈肌腱重建术(FCRLR)的循环特性和失效负荷特性。我们假设与FCRLR相比,FLSS将具有更高的刚度、屈服强度和极限负荷。
使用十对匹配的尸体手。每对手的一侧随机分配接受FCRLR或FLSS,对侧接受另一种悬吊成形术。进行完整的大多角骨切除术后,再进行FLSS或FCRLR。通过向远侧至近侧方向加载来测量循环特性和失效负荷特性。施加1 N的预负荷,进行1 N至10 N的30个循环,然后进行至失效负荷的加载。采用配对检验进行统计分析(P<0.05)。
在循环加载过程中,FLSS的不可恢复变形和峰值负荷时的变形显著降低(P<0.04)。与FCRLR相比,FLSS的刚度、屈服负荷、极限负荷以及在10 mm位移时吸收的负荷和能量也显著增加(P<0.04)。所有10个FCRLR标本均因缝线从肌腱中撕裂而失效。9个FLSS标本因缝线从SwiveLock锚钉(Arthrex公司,佛罗里达州那不勒斯)上滑脱而失效,1个因FiberTak锚钉(Arthrex公司,佛罗里达州那不勒斯)从示指掌骨中穿出而失效。
与大多角骨切除术后FCRLR相比,采用FLSS的悬吊成形术显示出更高的结构完整性。FLSS手术可能会减少拇指沉降并降低结构失效的发生率。