Iqbal Nusrat, Fletcher Jordan, Bassett Paul, Hart Ailsa, Lung Phillip, Tozer Phil
Robin Phillips' Fistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar;26(3):518-526. doi: 10.1111/codi.16861. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Patient understanding of disease can guide decision-making in the management of anal fistula. This prospective feasibility study aimed to assess the acceptability and methods of assessing the impact of viewing realistic models on patients with anal fistula.
New referrals to a tertiary clinic participated in this single-centre, parallel-group randomized controlled study. Baseline characteristics, Decisional Conflict Scale and understanding of disease were assessed pre-consultation. Participants were randomized to a standard consultation, where disease and treatment options were explained using magnetic resonance images and drawn diagrams, or a similar consultation supplemented with an appropriate generic three-dimensional (3D) printed model. Understanding of disease and proposed surgery, Decisional Conflict Scale and ratings of visual aids were assessed post-consultation, along with 3D model feedback.
All 52 patients who were approached agreed to be randomized (25 standard, 27 3D consultation). Understanding of disease increased post-consultation in both groups. Post-consultation decisional conflict (0, no; 100, high decisional conflict) was low (median 27 post-standard vs. 24 post-3D consultation). Patients scored highly on measures assessing understanding of proposed surgery. 3D models were rated highly, with 96% of patients wanting to see them again in future consultations.
Three-dimensional printed fistula models are a welcome addition to outpatient consultations with results suggesting that understanding of surgery is improved. A future trial should be powered to detect whether 3D models result in a significant improvement in understanding beyond traditional methods of explanation and explore the conditions in which models have their maximal utility.
This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04069728). Registered on 23 August 2019.
患者对疾病的理解可指导肛瘘治疗中的决策制定。本前瞻性可行性研究旨在评估观看实物模型对肛瘘患者影响的可接受性及评估方法。
三级诊所的新转诊患者参与了这项单中心、平行组随机对照研究。在会诊前评估基线特征、决策冲突量表及对疾病的理解。参与者被随机分为接受标准会诊组(使用磁共振图像和示意图解释疾病及治疗方案)或类似会诊并辅以合适的通用三维(3D)打印模型组。会诊后评估对疾病及拟行手术的理解、决策冲突量表及视觉辅助工具评分,同时收集3D模型反馈。
所有52名被邀请的患者均同意随机分组(25名接受标准会诊,27名接受3D会诊)。两组会诊后对疾病的理解均有所提高。会诊后的决策冲突(0表示无;100表示高决策冲突)较低(标准会诊后中位数为27,3D会诊后为24)。患者在评估对拟行手术理解的指标上得分较高。3D模型评分很高,96%的患者希望在未来会诊中再次看到它们。
三维打印肛瘘模型是门诊会诊中一项受欢迎的补充,结果表明对手术的理解得到了改善。未来的试验应有足够的样本量来检测3D模型是否能在传统解释方法之外显著提高理解程度,并探索模型发挥最大效用的条件。
本研究在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册(编号:NCT04069728)。于2019年8月23日注册。