Department of Anesthesiology, Linping District Women and Children Care Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Jan;28(1):126-135. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202401_34898.
This study aimed at determining the optimal dose combination of alfentanil and propofol for outpatient abortion anesthesia.
The study was separated into two parts. In the first part, patients were to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and the 95% effective dose (ED95) of alfentanil in combination with 2.5 mg·kg-1 propofol to inhibit body movements during the abortion using the Dixon up-and-down sequential allocation method. In the second part, 170 patients were randomly divided into group C (2.0 mg·kg-1 propofol with alfentanil 12.16 μg·kg-1) and group E (2.5 mg·kg-1 propofol with its ED95) to compare the anesthetic effect. The primary outcome was the sedation level during general anesthesia. The secondary outcomes were circulation, respiratory complications, and postoperative recovery quality.
The ED50 and the ED95 values of alfentanil were 3.37 μg·kg-1 (95% CI: 2.58-3.97 μg·kg-1) and 4.68 μg·kg-1 (95% CI: 4.04-9.32 μg·kg-1). The frequency of deep sedation in group E was significantly higher than in group C (76.5% vs. 60%). Patients in group C showed more wakefulness even during the surgery (14.3% vs. 4.4%). The results of our exploratory analyses did not reveal differences in respiratory depression, circulatory depression, postoperative side effects, or recovery outcomes.
The combination of 2.5 mg·kg-1 propofol and 4.68 μg·kg-1 alfentanil produces a better sedative effect than the combination of 2.0 mg·kg-1 propofol and 12.16 μg·kg-1 alfentanil without increasing additional risks associated with anesthesia.
本研究旨在确定阿芬太尼和丙泊酚联合用于门诊流产麻醉的最佳剂量组合。
本研究分为两部分。在第一部分中,采用 Dixon 上下序贯分配法,根据患者在流产过程中抑制躯体运动的反应,确定阿芬太尼联合 2.5mg·kg-1 丙泊酚时的半数有效剂量(ED50)和 95%有效剂量(ED95)。在第二部分中,将 170 例患者随机分为 C 组(丙泊酚 2.0mg·kg-1 联合阿芬太尼 12.16μg·kg-1)和 E 组(丙泊酚 2.5mg·kg-1 联合其 ED95),比较两组的麻醉效果。主要结局为全身麻醉镇静水平。次要结局为循环、呼吸并发症和术后恢复质量。
阿芬太尼的 ED50 和 ED95 值分别为 3.37μg·kg-1(95%CI:2.58-3.97μg·kg-1)和 4.68μg·kg-1(95%CI:4.04-9.32μg·kg-1)。E 组深度镇静的发生率明显高于 C 组(76.5% vs. 60%)。C 组即使在手术期间也有更多的清醒患者(14.3% vs. 4.4%)。我们的探索性分析结果并未显示呼吸抑制、循环抑制、术后副作用或恢复结果的差异。
与联合 2.0mg·kg-1 丙泊酚和 12.16μg·kg-1 阿芬太尼相比,联合 2.5mg·kg-1 丙泊酚和 4.68μg·kg-1 阿芬太尼产生更好的镇静效果,而不会增加麻醉相关的额外风险。