Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Biotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Feb 21;90(2):e0165823. doi: 10.1128/aem.01658-23. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
In this study, we compared conventional vacuum filtration of small volumes through disc membranes (effective sample volumes for potable water: 0.3-1.0 L) with filtration of high volumes using ultrafiltration (UF) modules (effective sample volumes for potable water: 10.6-84.5 L) for collecting bacterial biomass from raw, finished, and tap water at seven drinking water systems. Total bacteria, spp., , spp., and complex in these samples were enumerated using both conventional quantitative PCR (qPCR) and viability qPCR (using propidium monoazide). In addition, PCR-amplified gene fragments were sequenced for microbial community analysis. The frequency of detection (FOD) of spp. in finished and tap water samples was much greater using UF modules (83% and 77%, respectively) than disc filters (24% and 33%, respectively). The FODs for spp. in raw, finished, and tap water samples were also consistently greater using UF modules than disc filters. Furthermore, the number of observed operational taxonomic units and diversity index values for finished and tap water samples were often substantially greater when using UF modules as compared to disc filters. Conventional and viability qPCR yielded similar results, suggesting that membrane-compromised cells represented a minor fraction of total bacterial biomass. In conclusion, our research demonstrates that large-volume filtration using UF modules improved the detection of opportunistic pathogens at the low concentrations typically found in public drinking water systems and that the majority of bacteria in these systems appear to be viable in spite of disinfection with free chlorine and/or chloramine.IMPORTANCEOpportunistic pathogens, such as , are a growing public health concern. In this study, we compared sample collection and enumeration methods on raw, finished, and tap water at seven water systems throughout the State of Minnesota, USA. The results showed that on-site filtration of large water volumes (i.e., 500-1,000 L) using ultrafiltration membrane modules improved the frequency of detection of relatively rare organisms, including opportunistic pathogens, compared to the common approach of filtering about 1 L using disc membranes. Furthermore, results from viability quantitative PCR (qPCR) with propidium monoazide were similar to conventional qPCR, suggesting that membrane-compromised cells represent an insignificant fraction of microorganisms. Results from these ultrafiltration membrane modules should lead to a better understanding of the microbial ecology of drinking water distribution systems and their potential to inoculate premise plumbing systems with opportunistic pathogens where conditions are more favorable for their growth.
在这项研究中,我们比较了通过圆盘膜对小体积(饮用水有效样品体积:0.3-1.0 升)进行常规真空过滤,以及使用超滤(UF)模块对高体积(饮用水有效样品体积:10.6-84.5 升)进行过滤,以从七个饮用水系统的原水、成品水和自来水收集细菌生物量。使用常规定量 PCR(qPCR)和使用吖啶橙的生存能力 qPCR(viability qPCR)对这些样品中的总细菌、 种、 种、 种和 复合体进行了计数。此外,还对微生物群落进行了扩增基因片段的测序分析。使用 UF 模块检测到成品水和自来水样品中的 种的检出频率(FOD)分别比圆盘过滤器高(分别为 83%和 77%)。使用 UF 模块检测到原水、成品水和自来水样品中的 种的 FOD 也比圆盘过滤器高。此外,与圆盘过滤器相比,UF 模块通常会使成品水和自来水样品的观察到的操作分类单元数量和多样性指数值大大增加。常规和生存能力 qPCR 产生了相似的结果,这表明膜受损的细胞仅占总细菌生物量的一小部分。总之,我们的研究表明,使用 UF 模块进行大容量过滤可以提高在公共饮用水系统中通常发现的低浓度下机会性病原体的检测,并且尽管用游离氯和/或氯胺进行消毒,但这些系统中的大多数细菌似乎仍然具有生存能力。重要性机会性病原体,如 ,是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。在这项研究中,我们比较了美国明尼苏达州七个水系统的原水、成品水和自来水的样品采集和计数方法。结果表明,与使用圆盘膜过滤约 1 升水的常见方法相比,使用超滤膜模块对大体积(即 500-1000 升)水进行现场过滤可提高相对罕见生物(包括机会性病原体)的检出频率。此外,使用吖啶橙的生存能力定量 PCR(qPCR)的结果与常规 qPCR 相似,这表明膜受损的细胞仅占微生物的一小部分。这些超滤膜模块的结果应有助于更好地了解饮用水分配系统的微生物生态学及其在有利于其生长的条件下将机会性病原体接种到前提管道系统中的潜力。