Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;10(3):390-394. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6052.
High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) have grown rapidly and may adversely affect access to comprehensive cancer care.
To evaluate the association of HDHPs with out-of-pocket medical costs and outpatient physician visits among patients with cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using 2003 to 2017 data from the deidentified Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database from individuals with employer-sponsored health coverage, adults aged 18 to 64 years with cancer who were enrolled in low-deductible (≤$500 annually) health plans during a baseline year were identified. Patients whose employers then mandated a switch to an HDHP (≥$1000 annual deductible) were assigned to the HDHP group, while contemporaneous individuals with cancer at baseline who had no option but to continue enrollment in low-deductible plans were assigned to the control group. The 2 groups were matched on demographic variables (age, sex, race and ethnicity, US Census region, rural vs urban, and neighborhood poverty level), cancer type, morbidity score, number of baseline physician visits by specialty type, baseline out-of-pocket costs, and employer characteristics. These cohorts were followed up for up to 3 years after the baseline year. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to December 2022.
Employer-mandated HDHP enrollment.
Out-of-pocket medical expenditures and outpatient visits to primary care physicians, cancer specialists, and noncancer specialists.
After matching, the sample included 45 708 patients with cancer (2703 patients in the HDHP group and 43 005 matched individuals in the control group); mean (SD) age in the HDHP and control groups was 52.9 (9.3) years and 52.9 (2.3) years, respectively, with 58.5% females in both groups. The matching procedure yielded variable weights for each individual in the control group, resulting in a weighted control group sample of 2703 patients. Patients with cancer who were switched to HDHPs experienced an increase in annual out-of-pocket medical expenditures of 68.1% (95% CI, 51.0%-85.3%; absolute increase, $1349.80 [95% CI, $1060.30-$1639.20]) after the switch compared with those who remained in traditional health plans. At follow-up, the number of oncology visits did not differ between the 2 groups (relative difference, 0.1%; 95% CI, -8.4% to 9.4%); however, the HDHP group had 10.8% (95% CI, -15.5% to -5.9%) fewer visits to primary care physicians and 5.9% (95% CI, -11.2% to -0.3%) fewer visits to noncancer specialists.
Results of this cohort study suggest that after enrollment in HDHPs, patients with cancer experienced substantial increases in out-of-pocket medical costs. The number of visits to oncologists was unchanged during follow-up, but the number of visits to noncancer physicians was lower. These findings suggest that HDHPs are unlikely to unfavorably affect key oncology services but might lead to less comprehensive care of cancer survivors.
高免赔额健康计划(HDHPs)迅速增长,可能对全面癌症护理的可及性产生不利影响。
评估 HDHPs 与癌症患者的自付医疗费用和门诊医生就诊之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:使用来自 Optum Clinformatics Data Mart 数据库的 2003 年至 2017 年的匿名数据,研究对象为雇主提供健康保险的个人,在基线年期间患有癌症且参加了低免赔额(每年≤$500)健康计划的 18 至 64 岁成年人。随后雇主强制转换为 HDHP(每年免赔额≥$1000)的患者被分配到 HDHP 组,而同期基线时别无选择只能继续参加低免赔额计划的癌症患者则被分配到对照组。这两组在人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、种族和民族、美国人口普查区域、农村与城市、以及社区贫困水平)、癌症类型、发病率评分、按专业类型进行的基线医生就诊次数、基线自付费用以及雇主特征方面进行匹配。在基线年后的最多 3 年内对这些队列进行了随访。数据分析于 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月进行。
雇主强制要求参加 HDHP。
自付医疗支出和初级保健医生、癌症专家和非癌症专家的门诊就诊次数。
匹配后,样本包括 45708 名癌症患者(HDHP 组 2703 名患者,对照组 43005 名匹配患者);HDHP 和对照组患者的平均(SD)年龄分别为 52.9(9.3)岁和 52.9(2.3)岁,两组女性均占 58.5%。匹配过程为对照组的每个个体生成了变量权重,从而为对照组生成了 2703 名加权样本患者。与仍留在传统健康计划中的患者相比,转换为 HDHP 的癌症患者在转换后每年自付医疗费用增加了 68.1%(95%CI,51.0%-85.3%;绝对增加,$1349.80 [95%CI,$1060.30-$1639.20])。随访时,两组之间的肿瘤就诊次数没有差异(相对差异,0.1%;95%CI,-8.4%至 9.4%);然而,HDHP 组的初级保健医生就诊次数减少了 10.8%(95%CI,-15.5%至-5.9%),非癌症专家的就诊次数减少了 5.9%(95%CI,-11.2%至-0.3%)。
这项队列研究的结果表明,参加 HDHP 后,癌症患者的自付医疗费用大幅增加。随访期间肿瘤医生就诊次数没有变化,但非肿瘤医生就诊次数减少。这些发现表明,HDHP 不太可能对关键的肿瘤服务产生不利影响,但可能导致癌症幸存者的护理不够全面。