Suppr超能文献

高免赔额保险参保前后的糖尿病门诊护理与急性并发症:糖尿病转化自然实验(NEXT-D)研究

Diabetes Outpatient Care and Acute Complications Before and After High-Deductible Insurance Enrollment: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study.

作者信息

Wharam J Frank, Zhang Fang, Eggleston Emma M, Lu Christine Y, Soumerai Stephen, Ross-Degnan Dennis

机构信息

Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Department of Population Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):358-368. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8411.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) have expanded under the Affordable Care Act and are expected to play a major role in the future of US health policy. The effects of modern HDHPs on chronically ill patients and adverse outcomes are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of HDHP with high-priority diabetes outpatient care and preventable acute complications.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Controlled interrupted-time-series study using a large national health insurer database from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012. A total of 12 084 HDHP members with diabetes, aged 12 to 64 years, who were enrolled for 1 year in a low-deductible (≤$500) plan followed by 2 years in an HDHP (≥$1000) after an employer-mandated switch were included. Patients transitioning to HDHPs were propensity-score matched with contemporaneous patients whose employers offered only low-deductible coverage. Low-income (n = 4121) and health savings account (HSA)-eligible (n = 1899) patients with diabetes were subgroups of interest. Data analysis was performed from February 23, 2015, to September 11, 2016.

EXPOSURES

Employer-mandated HDHP transition.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

High-priority outpatient visits, disease monitoring tests, and outpatient and emergency department visits for preventable acute diabetes complications.

RESULTS

In the 12 084 HDHP members included after the propensity score match, the mean (SD) age was 50.4 (10.0) years; 5410 of the group (44.8%) were women. The overall, low-income, and HSA-eligible diabetes HDHP groups experienced increases in out-of-pocket medical expenditures of 49.4% (95% CI, 40.3% to 58.4%), 51.7% (95% CI, 38.6% to 64.7%), and 67.8% (95% CI, 47.9% to 87.8%), respectively, compared with controls in the year after transitioning to HDHPs. High-priority primary care visits and disease monitoring tests did not change significantly in the overall HDHP cohort; however, high-priority specialist visits declined by 5.5% (95% CI, -9.6% to -1.5%) in follow-up year 1 and 7.1% (95% CI, -11.5% to -2.7%) in follow-up year 2 vs baseline. Outpatient acute diabetes complication visits were delayed in the overall and low-income HDHP cohorts at follow-up (adjusted hazard ratios, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88 to 0.99] for the overall cohort and 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98] for the low-income cohort). Annual emergency department acute complication visits among HDHP members increased by 8.0% (95% CI, 4.6% to 11.4%) in the overall group, 21.7% (95% CI, 14.5% to 28.9%) in the low-income group, and 15.5% (95% CI, 10.5% to 20.6%) in the HSA-eligible group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Patients with diabetes experienced minimal changes in outpatient visits and disease monitoring after an HDHP switch, but low-income and HSA-eligible HDHP members experienced major increases in emergency department visits for preventable acute diabetes complications.

摘要

重要性

高免赔额健康保险计划(HDHPs)在《平价医疗法案》实施后得到了扩展,预计将在美国未来的卫生政策中发挥重要作用。现代HDHPs对慢性病患者及不良后果的影响尚不清楚。

目的

确定HDHP与高优先级糖尿病门诊护理及可预防的急性并发症之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:采用一项对照中断时间序列研究,使用2003年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间一个大型全国性健康保险公司数据库。共有12084名年龄在12至64岁之间的糖尿病HDHP成员被纳入研究,他们先参加了1年的低免赔额(≤500美元)计划,之后在雇主强制转换后参加了2年的HDHP(≥1000美元)计划。向HDHPs转换的患者与同期雇主仅提供低免赔额保险的患者进行倾向得分匹配。低收入(n = 4121)和符合健康储蓄账户(HSA)条件(n = 1899)的糖尿病患者是感兴趣的亚组。数据分析于2015年2月23日至2016年9月11日进行。

暴露因素

雇主强制的HDHP转换。

主要结局和测量指标

高优先级门诊就诊、疾病监测检查以及因可预防的急性糖尿病并发症而进行的门诊和急诊科就诊。

结果

在倾向得分匹配后纳入的12084名HDHP成员中,平均(标准差)年龄为50.4(10.0)岁;该组中5410名(44.8%)为女性。与转换到HDHPs后第一年的对照组相比,总体、低收入和符合HSA条件的糖尿病HDHP组的自付医疗费用分别增加了49.4%(95%CI,40.3%至58.4%)、51.7%(95%CI,38.6%至64.7%)和67.8%(95%CI,47.9%至87.8%)。在总体HDHP队列中,高优先级初级保健就诊和疾病监测检查没有显著变化;然而,在随访第1年,高优先级专科就诊下降了5.5%(95%CI,-9.6%至-1.5%),在随访第2年与基线相比下降了7.1%(95%CI,-11.5%至-2.7%)。在随访时,总体和低收入HDHP队列中糖尿病门诊急性并发症就诊有所延迟(总体队列调整后风险比为0.94[95%CI,0.88至0.99],低收入队列调整后风险比为0.89[95%CI,0.81至0.98])。HDHP成员中每年急诊科急性并发症就诊在总体组增加了8.0%(95%CI,4.6%至11.4%),低收入组增加了21.7%(95%CI,14.5%至28.9%),符合HSA条件组增加了15.5%(95%CI,10.5%至20.6%)。

结论与相关性

糖尿病患者在转换到HDHP后门诊就诊和疾病监测变化极小,但低收入和符合HSA条件的HDHP成员因可预防的急性糖尿病并发症到急诊科就诊大幅增加。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Association Between Cost-Sharing and Buprenorphine Prescription Abandonment.费用分担与丁丙诺啡处方放弃的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2160-2168. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08819-2. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验