Suppr超能文献

利用信息技术提高儿科重症监护病房传染病查房时的跨学科交流。

The use of information technology to improve interdisciplinary communication during infectious diseases ward rounds on the paediatric intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, 1K12-D, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Paediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51986-9.

Abstract

Prospective audit with feedback during infectious diseases ward rounds (IDWR) is a common antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practice on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). These interdisciplinary meetings rely on the quality of handover, with high risk of omission of information. We developed an electronic platform integrating infection-related patient data (COSARAPed). In the mixed PICU of a Belgian tertiary hospital we conducted an observational prospective cohort study comparing patient handovers during IDWRs using the COSARAPed-platform to those with access only to conventional resources. The quality of handover was investigated directly by assessment if the narrative was in accordance with Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation principles and if adequate demonstration of diagnostic information occurred, and also indirectly by registration if this was only achieved after intervention by the non-presenting AMS team members. We also recorded all AMS-recommendations. During a 6-month study period, 24 IDWRs and 82 patient presentations were assessed. We could only find a statistically significant advantage in favor of COSARAPed by indirect evaluation. We registered 92 AMS-recommendations, mainly resulting in reduced antibiotic pressure. We concluded that the IDWR is an appropriate platform for AMS on the PICU and that the utilisation of COSARAPed may enhance the quality of patient handover.

摘要

前瞻性审核与反馈在传染病查房(IDWR)中是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中常见的抗菌药物管理(AMS)实践。这些跨学科会议依赖于交接班的质量,存在信息遗漏的高风险。我们开发了一个集成感染相关患者数据的电子平台(COSARAPed)。在比利时一家三级医院的混合 PICU 中,我们进行了一项观察性前瞻性队列研究,比较了使用 COSARAPed 平台进行 IDWR 患者交接班与仅使用传统资源进行交接班的情况。通过评估叙述是否符合情况-背景-评估-建议原则以及是否充分展示诊断信息来直接评估交接班质量,如果非在场的 AMS 团队成员进行干预后才达到这一标准,则间接评估交接班质量。我们还记录了所有 AMS 建议。在 6 个月的研究期间,评估了 24 次 IDWR 和 82 次患者介绍。我们仅通过间接评估发现 COSARAPed 具有统计学优势。我们记录了 92 项 AMS 建议,主要是减少抗生素压力。我们得出结论,IDWR 是 PICU 上 AMS 的合适平台,使用 COSARAPed 可能会提高患者交接班的质量。

相似文献

4
Team performance during postsurgical patient handovers in paediatric care.儿科术后患者交接过程中的团队表现。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;179(4):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03547-w. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

4
Collaborative Antimicrobial Stewardship: Working with Information Technology.协作式抗菌药物管理:与信息技术合作。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;34(1):31-49. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
5
Early warning scores in paediatrics: an overview.儿科早期预警评分:概述。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Apr;104(4):395-399. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314807. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
7
Quantifying drivers of antibiotic resistance in humans: a systematic review.量化人类抗生素耐药性的驱动因素:系统评价。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;18(12):e368-e378. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30296-2. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验