Suppr超能文献

验证阶段对训练有素的成年人最大摄氧量的确定几乎没有价值。

A verification phase adds little value to the determination of maximum oxygen uptake in well-trained adults.

机构信息

Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department Medicine, Training and Health, Institute of Sports Science and Motologie, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Jun;124(6):1669-1681. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05388-w. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective was to investigate if performing a sub-peak or supra-peak verification phase following a ramp test provides additional value for determining 'true' maximum oxygen uptake ( O).

METHODS

17 and 14 well-trained males and females, respectively, performed two ramp tests each followed by a verification phase. While the ramp tests were identical, the verification phase differed in power output, wherein the power output was either 95% or 105% of the peak power output from the ramp test. The recovery phase before the verification phase lasted until capillary blood lactate concentration was ≤ 4 mmol·L. If a O plateau occurred during ramp test, the following verification phase was considered to provide no added value. If no O plateau occurred and the highest O ( O) during verification phase was < 97%, between 97 and 103%, or > 103% of O achieved during the ramp test, no value, potential value, and certain value were attributed to the verification phase, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean (standard deviation) O during both ramp tests was 64.5 (6.0) mL·kg·min for males and 54.8 (6.2) mL·kg·min for females. For the 95% verification phase, 20 tests showed either a O plateau during ramp test or a verification O < 97%, indicating no value, 11 showed potential value, and 0 certain value. For the 105% verification phase, the values were 26, 5, and 0 tests, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In well-trained adults, a sub-peak verification phase might add little value in determining 'true' maximum O, while a supra-peak verification phase adds no value.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在递增负荷运动测试后进行次峰或超峰验证阶段是否能为确定“真实”最大摄氧量( O)提供额外价值。

方法

分别有 17 名和 14 名训练有素的男性和女性参与者进行了两次递增负荷运动测试,每次测试后均进行验证阶段。尽管两次递增负荷运动测试的方案相同,但验证阶段的功率输出不同,其中功率输出分别为递增负荷运动测试中峰值功率输出的 95%或 105%。在验证阶段之前的恢复阶段,直到毛细血管血乳酸浓度≤4mmol·L 时才结束。如果在递增负荷运动测试中出现 O 平台,则认为随后的验证阶段没有提供额外价值。如果没有出现 O 平台,且验证阶段的最高 O( O)<97%、在 97%至 103%之间或>递增负荷运动测试中 O 的 103%,则分别将验证阶段归因于无价值、潜在价值和确定价值。

结果

男性参与者的两次递增负荷运动测试的平均(标准差) O 分别为 64.5(6.0)mL·kg·min,女性参与者的平均(标准差) O 分别为 54.8(6.2)mL·kg·min。对于 95%的验证阶段,20 次测试显示在递增负荷运动测试中出现了 O 平台或验证 O<97%,表明无价值;11 次测试显示潜在价值;0 次测试显示确定价值。对于 105%的验证阶段,相应的测试次数分别为 26、5 和 0。

结论

在训练有素的成年人中,次峰验证阶段可能在确定“真实”最大 O 方面几乎没有价值,而超峰验证阶段则没有价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3670/11130000/668f3efac108/421_2023_5388_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验