• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤后靶向自动调节指导脑灌注压(COGiTATE):一项可行性随机对照临床试验。

Targeting Autoregulation-Guided Cerebral Perfusion Pressure after Traumatic Brain Injury (COGiTATE): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Maastricht (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University Maastricht (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2021 Oct 15;38(20):2790-2800. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0197. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2021.0197
PMID:34407385
Abstract

Managing traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) near to the cerebral autoregulation (CA)-guided "optimal" CPP (CPPopt) value is associated with improved outcome and might be useful to individualize care, but has never been prospectively evaluated. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of CA-guided CPP management in TBI patients requiring intracranial pressure monitoring and therapy (TBIicp patients). The CPPopt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness (COGiTATE) parallel two-arm feasibility trial took place in four tertiary centers. TBIicp patients were randomized to either the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guideline CPP target range (control group) or to the individualized CA-guided CPP targets (intervention group). CPP targets were guided by six times daily software-based alerts for up to 5 days. The primary feasibility end-point was the percentage of time with CPP concordant (±5 mm Hg) with the set CPP targets. The main secondary safety end-point was an increase in therapeutic intensity level (TIL) between the control and intervention group. Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the control and 32 patients to the intervention group. CPP in the intervention group was in the target range for 46.5% (interquartile range, 41.2-58) of the monitored time, significantly higher than the feasibility target specified in the published protocol (36%;  < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups for TIL or for other safety end-points. Conclusively, targeting an individual and dynamic CA-guided CPP is feasible and safe in TBIicp patients. This encourages a prospective trial powered for clinical outcomes.

摘要

管理创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 患者的脑灌注压 (CPP) 接近脑自动调节 (CA) 指导的“最佳”CPP (CPPopt) 值与改善预后相关,并且可能有助于个体化治疗,但从未进行前瞻性评估。本研究评估了 CA 指导的 CPP 管理在需要颅内压监测和治疗的 TBI 患者 (TBIicp 患者) 中的可行性和安全性。CPPopt 指导治疗:目标效果评估 (COGiTATE) 是一项在四个三级中心进行的平行双臂可行性试验。TBIicp 患者被随机分配到脑外伤基金会 (BTF) 指南 CPP 目标范围 (对照组) 或个体化 CA 指导 CPP 目标 (干预组)。CPP 目标由每天六次基于软件的警报来指导,最多持续 5 天。主要的可行性终点是 CPP 与设定 CPP 目标一致 (±5mmHg) 的时间百分比。主要的次要安全性终点是对照组和干预组之间治疗强度水平 (TIL) 的增加。28 名患者被随机分配到对照组,32 名患者被随机分配到干预组。干预组的 CPP 在监测时间的 46.5%(四分位间距,41.2-58) 内处于目标范围内,明显高于发表方案中规定的可行性目标 (36%;<0.001)。两组间 TIL 或其他安全性终点均无显著差异。总之,在 TBIicp 患者中,针对个体和动态 CA 指导的 CPP 是可行且安全的。这鼓励进行有临床结局的前瞻性试验。

相似文献

1
Targeting Autoregulation-Guided Cerebral Perfusion Pressure after Traumatic Brain Injury (COGiTATE): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.创伤性脑损伤后靶向自动调节指导脑灌注压(COGiTATE):一项可行性随机对照临床试验。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Oct 15;38(20):2790-2800. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0197. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol.采用自动评估最佳脑灌注压方法对个体化严重创伤性脑损伤管理的可行性:COGiTATE 二期研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.
3
An Update on the COGiTATE Phase II Study: Feasibility and Safety of Targeting an Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure as a Patient-Tailored Therapy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.COGiTATE 二期研究更新:在严重创伤性脑损伤中靶向最佳脑灌注压作为患者定制治疗的可行性和安全性。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:143-147. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_29.
4
Continuous Assessment of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study of Feasibility, Reliability, and Relation to Outcome.颅脑创伤中“最佳”脑灌注压的连续评估:一项可行性、可靠性及与预后相关性的队列研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Feb;30(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0570-4.
5
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Targeted Treatment for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.最佳脑灌注压:重度创伤性脑损伤的靶向治疗
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 15;37(2):389-396. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6551. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Autoregulatory or Fixed Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury: Determining Which Is Better in an Energy Metabolic Perspective.创伤性脑损伤中自动调节或固定的脑灌注压目标:从能量代谢角度确定哪种更好。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jul 15;38(14):1969-1978. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7290. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
The effects of cerebral pressure autoregulation status and CPP levels on cerebral metabolism in pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤中脑压力自动调节状态和脑灌注压水平对脑代谢的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 24;166(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06085-z.
9
Temporal Neurophysiological Dynamics in Traumatic Brain Injury: Role of Pressure Reactivity and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure for Predicting Outcome.创伤性脑损伤的时间神经生理动力学:压力反应和最佳脑灌注压在预测结果中的作用。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jun;36(11):1818-1827. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6157. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
10
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Management at Bedside: A Single-Center Pilot Study.床边最佳脑灌注压管理:一项单中心试点研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):92-102. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0103-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial ultrasound in the critically ill patient: a narrative review.危重症患者的经颅超声检查:一项叙述性综述
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Aug 18;13(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00787-z.
2
Visualizations of autoregulatory insults in moderate-to-severe paediatric traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis from the multicentre STARSHIP trial.中重度小儿创伤性脑损伤中自动调节损伤的可视化:多中心STARSHIP试验的二次分析
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 4;29(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05568-4.
3
Dynamic versus fixed cerebral perfusion pressure targets in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a STARSHIP analysis.
小儿创伤性脑损伤中动态与固定脑灌注压目标:一项STARSHIP分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 17;86:103370. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103370. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Increased Blood Pressure Variability is Associated with More Time Spent Outside Personalized Limits of Cerebral Autoregulation in Postpartum Preeclampsia.血压变异性增加与产后子痫前期超出脑自动调节个性化限度的时间延长有关。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02316-y.
5
Cerebral Autoregulation and Optimal Blood Pressure from Birth to Surgery in Neonates with Critical Congenital Heart Disease.患有严重先天性心脏病的新生儿从出生到手术期间的脑自动调节和最佳血压
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s00246-025-03921-6.
6
Cerebral perfusion pressure targets after traumatic brain injury: a reappraisal.创伤性脑损伤后的脑灌注压目标:重新评估
Crit Care. 2025 May 21;29(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05458-9.
7
Continuous personalized cerebrovascular reactivity-based physiologic metrics in neurocritical care: a narrative review of the current landscape, limitations, and future directions.神经重症监护中基于持续个性化脑血管反应性的生理指标:对当前现状、局限性及未来方向的叙述性综述
Front Physiol. 2025 May 6;16:1582813. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1582813. eCollection 2025.
8
Intracranial pressure dynamics, cerebral autoregulation, and brain perfusion after decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: is there a role for invasive monitoring?恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性颅骨切除术后的颅内压动态、脑自动调节和脑灌注:有创监测有作用吗?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 May 9;167(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06537-0.
9
Current Management and Future Challenges in the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.重度创伤性脑损伤的当前管理及管理中的未来挑战
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 17;61(4):738. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040738.
10
Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Children.儿童脑自动调节功能受损
Pediatr Neurol. 2025 Jun;167:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Mar 13.