Narayanan Suresh, Adikesavan Priyadharshini N, Ananthy Vimala
Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madurai, Ramanathapuram, IND.
Department of Anatomy, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 19;15(12):e50789. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50789. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Introduction Activity-based teaching is a widely used pedagogical tool for enhancing anatomy learning. However, involving the learner in experiential activities in lectures is an unexplored area in medical research. The present study aims to determine whether incorporating student experiential activities into lectures impacts student's learning of neuroanatomy. Materials and methods We used a pre-test/post-test experimental study design to compare the learning outcome between the experiential activity based lecture and traditional lectures. We divided 150 students into control (75 students) and intervention groups (75 students). To assess the baseline knowledge on the subject, the students attended 20 clinical scenario-based multiple-choice questions two weeks before the lectures. Then, both groups attended two lecture sessions on the functional areas of the brain. In the control group, the students drew the boundaries of a particular cerebral area and labeled its function and clinical symptoms. In the intervention group, the learners participated in experiential activities while following the instructions. The lecturer used their response as a scaffold to explain the function and clinical correlation of a specific part of the cerebral cortex. The same test questions were given to the students one week after the final lecture session to evaluate their level of understanding. We analyzed the scores of 111 students (57 students in the control group and 54 students in the interventional group) who attended the two lectures and pre- and post-test sessions. Students also completed a validated 10-item feedback questionnaire regarding their perception of the teaching sessions. Results The mean score improvement for the control and intervention groups was 4.86 ± 1.53 and 6.39 ± 2.93, respectively. The score improvement of the activity group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p = 0.006; d = 0.65). The perception scores of interest, knowledge attainment, and satisfaction were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that experiential activities facilitate better comprehension of abstract neuroanatomical concepts as compared to traditional didactic teaching.
引言
基于活动的教学是一种广泛应用于促进解剖学学习的教学工具。然而,在讲座中让学习者参与体验式活动在医学研究中仍是一个未被探索的领域。本研究旨在确定将学生体验式活动纳入讲座是否会影响学生对神经解剖学的学习。
材料与方法
我们采用前测/后测实验研究设计,比较基于体验式活动的讲座与传统讲座的学习效果。我们将150名学生分为对照组(75名学生)和干预组(75名学生)。为评估学生对该学科的基线知识,学生在讲座前两周参加20道基于临床情景的多项选择题测试。然后,两组学生都参加了关于大脑功能区的两场讲座。在对照组中,学生绘制特定脑区的边界并标注其功能和临床症状。在干预组中,学习者按照指导参与体验式活动。讲师以他们的回答为支架,解释大脑皮层特定部位的功能和临床关联。在最后一场讲座结束一周后,向学生提供相同的测试问题,以评估他们的理解水平。我们分析了参加两场讲座以及前测和后测环节的111名学生(对照组57名学生,干预组54名学生)的成绩。学生们还完成了一份经过验证的10项反馈问卷,以表达他们对教学环节的看法。
结果
对照组和干预组的平均成绩提高分别为4.86±1.53和6.39±2.93。活动组的成绩提高显著高于对照组(p = 0.006;d = 0.65)。与对照组相比,干预组在兴趣、知识获取和满意度方面的感知得分显著更高。
结论
本研究结果表明,与传统的讲授式教学相比,体验式活动有助于更好地理解抽象的神经解剖学概念。