Warren Sarah E, Barron Autumn L
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 4;4:1306485. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1306485. eCollection 2023.
Hearing loss is associated with a range of poor psychosocial outcomes. Cochlear implants (CI) are an available treatment option for significant hearing loss and have been linked to improved quality of life in patients. Evidence suggests that audiologists lack the skills to appropriately detect, address, and refer for psychosocial needs among patients with hearing loss. The objective of this study is to examine the attitudes and practice patterns related to psychosocial care among audiologists who work with CI users.
A cross-sectional survey was administered to clinical audiologists who work with CI recipients in the United States. The survey evaluated participants' attitudes toward psychosocial services and factors that contribute to their abilities to address the psychosocial needs of their patients. Additionally, participants were surveyed about their practice patterns including the use of psychosocial screeners, clinical protocols regarding psychosocial care, and referral patterns for coordinated psychosocial services. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey responses.
Sixty-eight audiologists completed the survey. Of these audiologists, a majority (73.6%) held the attitude that most or all CI patients would benefit from psychosocial intervention. Despite clinicians' recognition of psychosocial needs in this population, over 90% of participants reported never screening for psychosocial symptoms. Additionally, a majority of respondents indicated that they seldom refer their patients for psychosocial services, with referrals occurring less than half the time (58%) or never (27%). Additionally, few audiologists reported utilizing protocols or resources for guiding psychosocial practices. Audiologists indicated that the primary factors that influence their psychosocial practices include time available to spend with the patient and their comfort level in counseling.
Audiologists working with CI patients recognize the potential benefit of psychosocial intervention in this population. Nevertheless, audiologists encounter barriers in clinical practice which limit their ability to identify and address the psychosocial needs of their patients. Strategies designed to enhance audiologists' capacity to recognize the psychosocial needs of CI users, in addition to improved interprofessional practice on CI teams, implies significant opportunities to improve the provision of patient-centered hearing care.
听力损失与一系列不良的心理社会后果相关。人工耳蜗(CI)是重度听力损失的一种可用治疗选择,并且已被证明与患者生活质量的改善有关。有证据表明,听力学家缺乏适当检测、处理和转介听力损失患者心理社会需求的技能。本研究的目的是调查与人工耳蜗使用者合作的听力学家在心理社会护理方面的态度和实践模式。
对在美国与人工耳蜗接受者合作的临床听力学家进行了一项横断面调查。该调查评估了参与者对心理社会服务的态度以及有助于他们满足患者心理社会需求能力的因素。此外,还对参与者的实践模式进行了调查,包括心理社会筛查工具的使用、心理社会护理的临床方案以及协调心理社会服务的转介模式。使用描述性统计来总结调查结果。
68名听力学家完成了调查。在这些听力学家中,大多数(73.6%)认为大多数或所有人工耳蜗患者将从心理社会干预中受益。尽管临床医生认识到这一人群的心理社会需求,但超过90%的参与者报告从未对心理社会症状进行筛查。此外,大多数受访者表示他们很少将患者转介接受心理社会服务,转介发生的时间不到一半(58%)或从不转介(27%)。此外,很少有听力学家报告使用协议或资源来指导心理社会实践。听力学家表示,影响他们心理社会实践的主要因素包括与患者相处的可用时间以及他们在咨询方面的舒适度。
与人工耳蜗患者合作的听力学家认识到心理社会干预对这一人群的潜在益处。然而,听力学家在临床实践中遇到障碍,限制了他们识别和满足患者心理社会需求的能力。旨在提高听力学家识别人工耳蜗使用者心理社会需求能力的策略,以及改善人工耳蜗团队的跨专业实践,意味着有重大机会改善以患者为中心的听力护理服务。