• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可弯曲腹腔镜器械进行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术是可行且更有效的。

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy performed using an articulating laparoscopic instrument is feasible and more efficient.

作者信息

Park Jung Hyun, Kim Dong Jin

机构信息

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2024 Jan 4;10:1305320. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1305320. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1305320
PMID:38239671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10794576/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ipsilateral left-sided-approach laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy (LA-TAPP) is a procedure used for inguinal hernia. However, conventional laparoscopic instruments may limit the operator's ability to approach certain areas during the procedure. This study aims to assess the feasibility of using an articulating bipolar grasper (ArtiSential®).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2017 and May 2022, 184 patients with inguinal hernia underwent LA-TAPP and were divided into an articulating group (AG) and a conventional group (CG). The two groups were compared for clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and recurrence rates. Learning curve analysis was also performed using the CUSUM score.

RESULTS

The AG and CG included 72 and 112 patients, respectively. Both groups had similar age, sex, BMI, hernia location, and hernia type. The AG had a significantly shorter operation time (59.2 ± 29.4 vs. 77.8 ± 22.4 min,  < 0.001) than the CG. The duration of hospitalization was slightly shorter in the AG (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 1.4 days,  = 0.056). Postoperative complications were lower in the AG (5.6%) than in the CG (9.8%). Scrotal neuralgic pain was observed in 1.4% of patients in the AG and 3.6% of patients in the CG. Learning curve analysis revealed that 24 cases were needed to overcome the learning curve for using an articulating device.

CONCLUSION

IP-TAPP with an articulating instrument is a safe and efficient procedure. The operation time can be reduced by improving the surgeon's procedural autonomy and reducing collisions between the instruments and the patient's ribs.

摘要

引言

同侧左侧入路腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(LA-TAPP)是一种用于腹股沟疝的手术。然而,传统的腹腔镜器械可能会限制术者在手术过程中接近某些区域的能力。本研究旨在评估使用可弯曲双极抓钳(ArtiSential®)的可行性。

材料与方法

2017年1月至2022年5月期间,184例腹股沟疝患者接受了LA-TAPP手术,并分为可弯曲组(AG)和传统组(CG)。比较两组的临床特征、手术结果和复发率。还使用累积和(CUSUM)评分进行学习曲线分析。

结果

AG组和CG组分别包括72例和112例患者。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数、疝位置和疝类型方面相似。AG组的手术时间明显短于CG组(59.2±29.4 vs. 77.8±22.4分钟,<0.001)。AG组的住院时间略短(2.2±0.5 vs. 2.5±1.4天,=0.056)。AG组的术后并发症低于CG组(5.6% vs. 9.8%)。AG组1.4%的患者和CG组3.6%的患者出现阴囊神经痛。学习曲线分析显示,使用可弯曲器械需要24例才能克服学习曲线。

结论

使用可弯曲器械的IP-TAPP是一种安全有效的手术。通过提高术者的操作自主性和减少器械与患者肋骨之间的碰撞,可以缩短手术时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f2/10794576/f1b69ee01f56/fsurg-10-1305320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f2/10794576/27bbf672e616/fsurg-10-1305320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f2/10794576/3b98f078171a/fsurg-10-1305320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f2/10794576/f1b69ee01f56/fsurg-10-1305320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f2/10794576/27bbf672e616/fsurg-10-1305320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f2/10794576/3b98f078171a/fsurg-10-1305320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9f2/10794576/f1b69ee01f56/fsurg-10-1305320-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy performed using an articulating laparoscopic instrument is feasible and more efficient.使用可弯曲腹腔镜器械进行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术是可行且更有效的。
Front Surg. 2024 Jan 4;10:1305320. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1305320. eCollection 2023.
2
Initial experience using a handheld fully articulating software-driven laparoscopic needle driver in TAPP inguinal hernia repair.使用手持全关节软件驱动腹腔镜持针器在 TAPP 腹股沟疝修补术中的初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):3221-3231. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08446-6. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: 1,054 procedures and experience.单切口经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术:1054 例手术及经验。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1187-1194. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02803-1. Epub 2023 May 28.
4
Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.从腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术过渡到机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:单中心回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2251-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3.
5
A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.改良腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)是腹股沟疝和股疝的标准手术:一项对1123例疝修补术的17年回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3208-9. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernioplasty: results in 182 Japanese patients.单切口腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片疝修补术:182例日本患者的手术结果
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1540-4. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:三级转诊中心 TEP 和 TAPP 手术的回顾性比较。
Minerva Chir. 2020 Oct;75(5):279-285. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy for bilateral inguinal hernias using conventional instruments.使用传统器械的单切口腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):320-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828f6ba8.
9
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
The Novel Technique of Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty Herniorrhaphy for Direct Inguinal Hernia: Suture Repair of Hernia Defect Wall.经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟直疝的新技术:疝缺损壁的缝合修复
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):83-88. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0045. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating minimally invasive bariatric surgery with lessons from gastric cancer surgery.将微创减肥手术与胃癌手术的经验相结合。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 24;15(1):10094. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82669-0.
2
Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using articulating laparoscopic instruments in older adults with gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.使用关节式腹腔镜器械对老年胃癌患者进行腹腔镜远端胃切除术后的加速康复:对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Feb;108(2):86-92. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.2.86. Epub 2025 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair for inguinal hernia treatment: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;6(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1194. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Efficacy of laparoscopic inguinal hernia in day surgery mode and inpatient surgery mode in China: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术模式与住院手术模式在中国的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 22;102(8):e32998. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032998.
3
Differences in in-hospital outcomes and healthcare utilization for laparoscopic versus open approach for emergency inguinal hernia repair: a nationwide analysis.
腹腔镜与开放式急诊腹股沟疝修补术的住院结局和医疗利用差异:全国性分析。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02742-x. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Usefulness of the new articulating laparoscopic instrument in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.新型关节式腹腔镜器械在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用价值
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Dec 15;25(4):161-164. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.161.
5
Laparoscopic transverse colectomy using a new articulating instrument.使用新型关节式器械的腹腔镜横结肠切除术
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2021 Dec 15;24(4):227-229. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2021.24.4.227.
6
Laparoscopic low anterior resection using new articulating instruments.使用新型关节式器械的腹腔镜低位前切除术
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Nov;25(11):1259-1261. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02486-9. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Comparison of intraocular pressure during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)与经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中眼压比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2018-2024. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08487-x. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
8
A three-arm randomized study to compare sexual functions and fertility indices following open mesh hernioplasty (OMH), laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of groin hernia.一项三臂随机研究比较了开放式网片修补术(OMH)、腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修复腹股沟疝后性功能和生育指数。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):3077-3084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07697-z. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Effect of direct defect closure during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair ("TEP/TAPP plus" technique) on post-operative outcomes.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中直接闭合缺损(“TEP/TAPP 附加”技术)对术后结果的影响。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):167-171. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02036-1. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair-register-based comparison of the outcome.TEP 或 TAPP 治疗复发性腹股沟疝修补术-基于登记的结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3872-3882. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5416-1. Epub 2017 Feb 3.