Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Sao Paulo Heart Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Apr;35(4):641-650. doi: 10.1111/jce.16188. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a novel therapeutic approach for functional bradyarrhythmias, specifically neurocardiogenic syncope or atrial fibrillation, achieved through endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation of vagal innervation, obviating the need for pacemaker implantation. Originating in the nineties, the first series of CNA procedures was published in 2005. Extra-cardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) is employed as a direct method for stepwise denervation control during CNA.
This study aimed to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of patients with severe cardioinhibitory syncope undergoing CNA with and without denervation confirmation via ECVS.
A cohort of 48 patients, predominantly female (56.3%), suffering from recurrent syncope (5.1 ± 2.5 episodes annually) that remained unresponsive to clinical and pharmacological interventions, underwent CNA, divided into two groups: ECVS and NoECVS, consisting of 34 and 14 cases, respectively. ECVS procedures were conducted with and without atrial pacing.
Demographic characteristics, left atrial size, and ejection fraction displayed no statistically significant differences between the groups. Follow-up duration was comparable, with 29.1 ± 15 months for the ECVS group and 31.9 ± 20 months for the NoECVS group (p = .24). Notably, syncope recurrence was significantly lower in the ECVS group (two cases vs. four cases, Log Rank p = .04). Moreover, the Hazard ratio revealed a fivefold higher risk of syncope recurrence in the NoECVS group.
This study demonstrates that concluding CNA with denervation confirmation via ECVS yields a higher success rate and a substantially reduced risk of syncope recurrence compared to procedures without ECVS confirmation.
心脏神经消融术(CNA)是一种治疗功能性心动过缓的新方法,特别是神经心源性晕厥或心房颤动,通过心内膜射频导管消融迷走神经支配来实现,避免了起搏器植入的需要。该方法起源于 90 年代,最初的 CNA 系列于 2005 年发表。心脏外迷走神经刺激(ECVS)是 CNA 过程中逐步去神经控制的直接方法。
本研究旨在比较接受 CNA 治疗的严重心脏抑制性晕厥患者有无 ECVS 去神经确认的长期随访结果。
48 例患者(主要为女性[56.3%]),反复晕厥(每年 5.1±2.5 次),对临床和药物干预无反应,接受了 CNA 治疗,分为 ECVS 组和 NoECVS 组,分别为 34 例和 14 例。ECVS 程序分别在心房起搏和无起搏的情况下进行。
两组患者的人口统计学特征、左心房大小和射血分数无统计学差异。随访时间相似,ECVS 组为 29.1±15 个月,NoECVS 组为 31.9±20 个月(p=0.24)。值得注意的是,ECVS 组的晕厥复发率明显较低(2 例与 4 例,Log Rank p=0.04)。此外,风险比显示 NoECVS 组的晕厥复发风险高出五倍。
本研究表明,与无 ECVS 确认的程序相比,以 ECVS 确认去神经作为 CNA 的结束,可提高成功率,并显著降低晕厥复发的风险。