• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前血型和筛查是否属于高价值医疗?对尿妇科手术前进行术前血型和筛查的成本效益分析。

Is Preoperative Type and Screen High-value Care? A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Performing Preoperative Type and Screen Prior to Urogynecological Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, 12208, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Apr;35(4):781-791. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05696-x. Epub 2024 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-023-05696-x
PMID:38240801
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Routine preoperative type and screen (T&S) is often ordered prior to urogynecological surgery but is rarely used. We aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of routine preoperative T&S and determine transfusion and transfusion reaction rates that make universal preoperative T&S cost effective.

METHODS

A decision tree model from the health care sector perspective compared costs (2020 US dollars) and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs) of universal preoperative T&S (cross-matched blood) vs no T&S (O negative blood). Our primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Input parameters included transfusion rates, transfusion reaction incidence, transfusion reaction severity rates, and costs of management. The base case included a transfusion probability of 1.26%; a transfusion reaction probability of 0.0013% with or 0.4% without T&S; and with a transfusion reaction, a 50% probability of inpatient management and 0.0042 annual disutility. Costs were estimated from Medicare national reimbursement schedules. The time horizon was surgery/admission. We assumed a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The base case and one-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that routine preoperative T&S is not cost effective, with an ICER of $63,721,632/QALY. The optimal strategy did not change when base case cost, transfusion probability, or transfusion reaction disutility were varied. Threshold analysis revealed that if transfusion reaction probability without T&S is >12%, routine T&S becomes cost effective. Scenarios identified as cost effective in the threshold and sensitivity analyses fell outside reported rates for urogynecological surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Within broad ranges, preoperative T&S is not cost effective, which supports re-evaluating routine T&S prior to urogynecological surgery.

摘要

简介和假设

术前常规血型和交叉配血(T&S)常用于妇科泌尿科手术,但很少使用。我们旨在评估常规术前 T&S 的成本效益,并确定使通用术前 T&S 具有成本效益的输血和输血反应率。

方法

从医疗保健部门的角度来看,决策树模型比较了通用术前 T&S(交叉配血)与无 T&S(O 型阴性血)的成本(2020 年美元)和效果(质量调整生命年,QALYs)。我们的主要结果是增量成本效益比(ICER)。输入参数包括输血率、输血反应发生率、输血反应严重程度率以及管理成本。基础案例包括输血概率为 1.26%;有无 T&S,输血反应概率分别为 0.0013%和 0.4%;输血反应后,50%的患者需要住院治疗,每年有 0.0042 的失能。成本根据 Medicare 国家报销计划进行估算。时间范围为手术/住院。我们假设愿意支付的阈值为 150,000 美元/QALY。进行了单因素和双因素敏感性分析。

结果

基础案例和单因素敏感性分析表明,常规术前 T&S 不具有成本效益,ICER 为 63,721,632 美元/QALY。当改变基础案例成本、输血概率或输血反应失能时,最佳策略没有改变。阈值分析表明,如果没有 T&S 的输血反应概率>12%,则常规 T&S 具有成本效益。在阈值和敏感性分析中确定为具有成本效益的方案落在报告的妇科泌尿科手术率之外。

结论

在广泛的范围内,术前 T&S 不具有成本效益,这支持重新评估妇科泌尿科手术前的常规 T&S。

相似文献

1
Is Preoperative Type and Screen High-value Care? A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Performing Preoperative Type and Screen Prior to Urogynecological Surgery.术前血型和筛查是否属于高价值医疗?对尿妇科手术前进行术前血型和筛查的成本效益分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Apr;35(4):781-791. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05696-x. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
2
Cost-effectiveness of routine type and screens in select urological surgeries.特定泌尿外科手术中常规类型及筛查的成本效益
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Apr;55(4):823-833. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03452-6. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
3
Transfusion Preparedness Strategies for Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.产科出血的输血准备策略:成本效益分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1347-1355. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002359.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nonoperative Management Versus Early Drilling for Stable Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee in Skeletally Immature Patients.非手术治疗与早期钻孔治疗对骨骼未成熟患者膝关节稳定剥脱性骨软骨炎的成本效益分析。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):624-634.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.与腹式子宫切除术相比,腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术联合肌瘤粉碎术治疗假定子宫肌瘤的成本效益分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
Analyzing cost-effectiveness of ulnar and median nerve transfers to regain forearm flexion.分析尺神经和正中神经移位术恢复前臂屈曲功能的成本效益。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Mar;42(3):E11. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.FOCUS16469.
7
Preoperative use of recombinant human erythropoietin in pediatric orthopedics: a decision model for long-term outcomes.小儿骨科中重组人促红细胞生成素的术前使用:长期预后的决策模型
Spine J. 2007 May-Jun;7(3):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Routine Laryngoscopy in the Surgical Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.常规喉镜检查在分化型甲状腺癌手术治疗中的成本效益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):949-956. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6356-2. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Iron-chelating therapies in a transfusion-dependent thalassaemia population in Thailand: a cost-effectiveness study.泰国依赖输血的地中海贫血患者群体中的铁螯合疗法:成本效益研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(7):493-505. doi: 10.2165/11587120-000000000-00000.
10
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Economic and Clinical Impacts of Anaemia Management Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Evidence From the UK Perspective.评估贫血管理策略的经济和临床影响:从英国视角对证据的系统评价
EJHaem. 2025 Aug 26;6(4):e70124. doi: 10.1002/jha2.70124. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
BJOG. 2022 Feb;129(3):336-344. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17012.
2
Examining the Utility and Cost of Routine Type and Screen Prior to Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.检查微创子宫切除术前行常规类型和筛查的效用和成本。
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00020.
3
Which patients on a gynecologic oncology service will require perioperative transfusion? A single-center retrospective cohort study.
妇科肿瘤科室的哪些患者需要围手术期输血?一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 15;48(1):47-52. doi: 10.31083/j.ceog.2021.01.2152.
4
Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions.溶血性输血反应
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):150-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1802338.
5
Blood transfusion after vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂阴道子宫切除术后输血
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;188(1):265-266. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1840-z. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
6
Transfusion Rates and the Utility of Type and Screen for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.输血率与盆腔器官脱垂手术中血型和交叉配血检查的应用
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb;26(1):51-55. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000589.
7
The incidence of transfusion and associated risk factors in pelvic reconstructive surgery.盆腔重建手术中输血的发生率及相关危险因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):612.e1-612.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
A model to predict risk of blood transfusion after gynecologic surgery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):506.e1-506.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
9
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.《健康与医疗领域成本效益分析的实施、方法学实践和报告推荐:第二版》。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
10
Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.机器人辅助与其他微创途径子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):650.e1-650.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 22.