美泊利单抗、贝那利珠单抗和度普利尤单抗在难治性哮喘患者中的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向匹配分析。
Comparative Effectiveness of Mepolizumab, Benralizumab, and Dupilumab among Patients with Difficult-to-Control Asthma: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity-matched Analysis.
作者信息
Kearney Christopher M, Sangani Ruchika, Shankar Divya, O'Connor George T, Law Anica C, Walkey Allan J, Bosch Nicholas A
机构信息
The Pulmonary Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
出版信息
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jun;21(6):866-874. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202306-566OC.
The comparative effectiveness of biologic agents used as add-on therapy in the management of difficult-to-control asthma is unclear. To compare the effectiveness of dupilumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab among patients with difficult-to-control asthma. Retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients with difficult-to-control asthma starting treatment with dupilumab, mepolizumab, or benralizumab as documented in a multicenter electronic health record and claims-based database between October 19, 2018, and September 30, 2022. Propensity-score matching was used to minimize bias from nonrandomized treatment assignment; a prespecified α-level was set at 0.017 to account for three primary comparisons. The exposure of interest was the new initiation of dupilumab, benralizumab, or mepolizumab treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of asthma exacerbations in the 1 year after initiation of biologic therapy modeled using a negative binomial approach. Among 893,668 patients with asthma who were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid and were ⩾12 years old (65% female; mean age, 49 yr), 3,943 started dupilumab, 1,902 started benralizumab, and 2,012 started mepolizumab, all without an alternative indication for biologic therapy. After matching, there were 1,805 patients in each group for comparisons between dupilumab and benralizumab, 1,865 for comparisons between dupilumab and mepolizumab, and 1,721 for comparisons between mepolizumab and benralizumab. For all pairwise comparisons, covariates were well balanced after matching (all standardized mean differences <0.1). Patients who initiated dupilumab had a significantly lower rate of asthma exacerbations (1.07 per year) compared with benralizumab (1.47 per year), with a rate ratio (RR) of 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.85), and also had a significantly lower rate of asthma exacerbations compared with mepolizumab (1.04 per year vs. 1.45 per year), with an RR of 0.72 (0.62-0.84). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of asthma exacerbations between mepolizumab (1.40 per year) and benralizumab (1.41 per year), with an RR of 1.00 (0.85-1.17). In patients with difficult-to-control asthma who had newly initiated biologic therapy, dupilumab was associated with a decreased rate of asthma exacerbations in the 1 year after initiation compared with mepolizumab or benralizumab.
生物制剂作为附加疗法用于治疗难治性哮喘的相对疗效尚不清楚。比较度普利尤单抗、美泊利单抗和贝那利珠单抗在难治性哮喘患者中的疗效。对2018年10月19日至2022年9月30日期间在多中心电子健康记录和基于索赔的数据库中有记录的开始使用度普利尤单抗、美泊利单抗或贝那利珠单抗治疗的成年难治性哮喘患者进行回顾性多中心队列研究。采用倾向评分匹配以尽量减少非随机治疗分配带来的偏倚;预先设定α水平为0.017以进行三项主要比较。感兴趣的暴露因素是开始新的度普利尤单抗、贝那利珠单抗或美泊利单抗治疗。主要结局是使用负二项式方法模拟的生物治疗开始后1年的哮喘加重率。在893,668例被处方吸入性糖皮质激素且年龄≥12岁的哮喘患者中(65%为女性;平均年龄49岁),3943例开始使用度普利尤单抗,1902例开始使用贝那利珠单抗,2012例开始使用美泊利单抗,所有患者均无生物治疗的替代指征。匹配后,每组有1805例患者用于度普利尤单抗与贝那利珠单抗的比较,1865例用于度普利尤单抗与美泊利单抗的比较,1721例用于美泊利单抗与贝那利珠单抗的比较。对于所有成对比较,匹配后协变量平衡良好(所有标准化均值差异<0.1)。与贝那利珠单抗(每年1.47次)相比,开始使用度普利尤单抗的患者哮喘加重率显著更低(每年1.07次),率比(RR)为0.73(95%置信区间,0.63 - 0.85),与美泊利单抗(每年1.04次对每年1.45次)相比,哮喘加重率也显著更低,RR为0.72(0.62 - 0.84)。美泊利单抗(每年1.40次)和贝那利珠单抗(每年1.41次)之间的哮喘加重率无统计学显著差异,RR为1.00(0.85 - 1.17)。在新开始生物治疗的难治性哮喘患者中,与美泊利单抗或贝那利珠单抗相比,度普利尤单抗在开始治疗后的1年与哮喘加重率降低相关。