Agache Ioana, Beltran Jessica, Akdis Cezmi, Akdis Mubeccel, Canelo-Aybar Carlos, Canonica Giorgio Walter, Casale Thomas, Chivato Tomas, Corren Jonathan, Del Giacco Stefano, Eiwegger Thomas, Firinu Davide, Gern James E, Hamelmann Eckard, Hanania Nicola, Mäkelä Mika, Hernández-Martín Irene, Nair Parameswaran, O'Mahony Liam, Papadopoulos Nikolaos G, Papi Alberto, Park Hae-Sim, Pérez de Llano Luis, Posso Margarita, Rocha Claudio, Quirce Santiago, Sastre Joaquin, Shamji Mohamed, Song Yang, Steiner Corinna, Schwarze Jurgen, Alonso-Coello Pablo, Palomares Oscar, Jutel Marek
Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania.
Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Allergy. 2020 May;75(5):1023-1042. doi: 10.1111/all.14221. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
Five biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV , without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drug-related adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV . More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.
五种生物制剂已被批准用于治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘,这是一种公认的表型。系统评价(SR)评估了贝那利珠单抗、度普利尤单抗、美泊利珠单抗、奥马珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗(按字母顺序排列)与重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘标准治疗相比的疗效和安全性。检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以识别用英文发表的随机对照试验(RCT)和卫生经济学评价。对每种生物制剂评估了与哮喘相关的关键和重要结局。使用GRADE评估偏倚风险和证据的确定性。评估了19项RCT(贝那利珠单抗3项RCT、度普利尤单抗3项RCT、美泊利珠单抗3项RCT、奥马珠单抗5项RCT和瑞利珠单抗5项RCT),纳入的受试者年龄在12至75岁之间(奥马珠单抗还包括6至11岁的受试者),试验时长从12至56周不等。所有生物制剂均能降低病情加重率,证据确定性高:贝那利珠单抗发病率比(IRR)为0.53(95%CI 0.39至0.72),度普利尤单抗(IRR)为0.43(95%CI 0.32至0.59),美泊利珠单抗IRR为0.49(95%CI 0.38至0.66),奥马珠单抗(IRR)为0.56(95%CI 0.40至0.77),瑞利珠单抗(IRR)为0.46(95%CI 0.37至0.58)。贝那利珠单抗、度普利尤单抗和美泊利珠单抗能降低口服糖皮质激素(OCS)的每日剂量,证据确定性高。所有评估的生物制剂可能改善哮喘控制、生活质量(QoL)和第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV),但未达到最小重要差异(中等确定性)。贝那利珠单抗、美泊利珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗会轻微增加药物相关不良事件(AE)和药物相关严重AE(证据确定性低至极低)。所有生物制剂每质量调整生命年价值的增量成本效益比均高于支付意愿阈值(中等确定性)。潜在节省源于住院、急诊和初级保健就诊次数的减少。所有获批的生物制剂均能降低重度哮喘加重率,贝那利珠单抗、度普利尤单抗和美泊利珠单抗能降低OCS剂量,这一点具有高确定性。改善哮喘控制、QoL、FEV具有中等确定性。需要更多关于长期安全性的数据以及儿科人群中更多的疗效数据。