Suppr超能文献

EDS-FLU 治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效:两项随机对照试验(ReOpen1 和 ReOpen2)。

Efficacy of EDS-FLU for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Two Randomized Controlled Trials (ReOpen1 and ReOpen2).

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.

University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Apr;12(4):1049-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.12.016. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent inflammatory disease. No medications are Food and Drug Administration-approved for the most common form, CRS without nasal polyps (also called "chronic sinusitis"). Novel biomechanics of the exhalation delivery system deliver fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) to sinonasal areas above the inferior turbinate, especially sinus drainage pathways not reached by standard-delivery nasal sprays.

OBJECTIVE

Assess EDS-FLU efficacy for CRS (irrespective of nasal polyps).

METHODS

Two randomized, EDS-placebo-controlled trials in adults with CRS irrespective of polyps (ReOpen1) or exclusively without polyps (ReOpen2) were conducted at 120 sites in 13 countries. Patients received EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril, or EDS-placebo, twice daily for 24 weeks. Coprimary measures were composite symptom score through week 4 and ethmoid/maxillary sinus percent opacification by computed tomography at week 24.

RESULTS

ReOpen1 (N = 332) composite symptom score least-squares mean change for EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril versus EDS-placebo was -1.58 and -1.60 versus -0.62 (P < .001, P < .001); ReOpen2 (N = 223), -1.54 and -1.74 versus -0.81 (P = .011, P = .001). In ReOpen1, sinus opacification least-squares mean change for EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril versus EDS-placebo was -5.58 and -6.20 versus -1.60 (P = .045, P = .018), and in ReOpen2, -7.00 and -5.14 versus +1.19 (P < .001, P = .009). Acute disease exacerbations were reduced by 56% to 66% with EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo (P = .001). There were significant, and similar magnitude, symptom reductions in patients using standard-delivery nasal steroid products just before entering the study (P < .001). Adverse events were similar to standard-delivery intranasal steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

EDS-FLU is the first nonsurgical treatment demonstrated to reduce symptoms, intrasinus opacification, and exacerbations in replicate randomized clinical trials in CRS, regardless of polyp status.

摘要

背景

慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种常见的炎症性疾病。没有药物被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于最常见的形式,即没有鼻息肉的 CRS(也称为“慢性鼻窦炎”)。新型呼气输送系统的生物力学将氟替卡松(EDS-FLU;XHANCE)输送到鼻甲上方的鼻-鼻窦区域,特别是标准输送鼻腔喷雾剂无法到达的窦引流途径。

目的

评估 EDS-FLU 治疗 CRS(不论是否有鼻息肉)的疗效。

方法

在 13 个国家的 120 个地点进行了两项随机、EDS-安慰剂对照试验,纳入了有或无鼻息肉的 CRS 成年患者(ReOpen1)或仅无鼻息肉的 CRS 成年患者(ReOpen2)。患者接受 EDS-FLU 每次每侧鼻腔喷 1 或 2 次,或 EDS-安慰剂,每天 2 次,持续 24 周。主要复合指标是第 4 周的综合症状评分和第 24 周的计算机断层扫描额窦/上颌窦的混浊百分比。

结果

ReOpen1(N=332)中 EDS-FLU 每次每侧鼻腔喷 1 或 2 次与 EDS-安慰剂相比,复合症状评分的最小二乘均数变化分别为-1.58 和-1.60 与-0.62(P<0.001,P<0.001);ReOpen2(N=223)中,分别为-1.54 和-1.74 与-0.81(P=0.011,P=0.001)。在 ReOpen1 中,EDS-FLU 每次每侧鼻腔喷 1 或 2 次与 EDS-安慰剂相比,窦混浊的最小二乘均数变化分别为-5.58 和-6.20 与-1.60(P=0.045,P=0.018),在 ReOpen2 中,分别为-7.00 和-5.14 与+1.19(P<0.001,P=0.009)。与 EDS-安慰剂相比,EDS-FLU 使急性疾病恶化减少了 56%至 66%(P=0.001)。在进入研究之前使用标准鼻腔类固醇产品的患者中,症状有显著且相似程度的减轻(P<0.001)。不良反应与标准鼻腔内类固醇相似。

结论

在复发性随机临床试验中,EDS-FLU 是第一个被证明可减轻症状、窦内混浊和恶化的非手术治疗方法,无论息肉状态如何。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验