• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对少数族裔老年人群体的癌症临床试验参与机会:一项以公平为重点的快速范围界定综述研究方案。

Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):e074191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074191.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074191
PMID:38245013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10807002/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intersection of race and older age compounds existing health disparities experienced by historically marginalised communities. Therefore, racialised older adults with cancer are more disadvantaged in their access to cancer clinical trials compared with age-matched counterparts. To determine what has already been published in this area, the rapid scoping review question are: what are the barriers, facilitators and potential solutions for enhancing access to cancer clinical trials among racialised older adults?

METHODS

We will use a rapid scoping review methodology in which we follow the six-step framework of Arksey and O'Malley, including a systematic search of the literature with abstract and full-text screening to be conducted by two independent reviewers, data abstraction by one reviewer and verification by a second reviewer using an Excel data abstraction sheet. Articles focusing on persons aged 18 and over who identify as a racialised person with cancer, that describe therapies/therapeutic interventions/prevention/outcomes related to barriers, facilitators and solutions to enhancing access to and equity in cancer clinical trials will be eligible for inclusion in this rapid scoping review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All data will be extracted from published literature. Hence, ethical approval and patient informed consent are not required. The findings of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences.

摘要

背景

种族和年龄的交集加剧了历史上边缘化社区所经历的现有健康差距。因此,与年龄匹配的同龄人相比,患有癌症的老年少数族裔在参与癌症临床试验方面处于更加不利的地位。为了确定在这一领域已经发表了哪些内容,本次快速范围审查的问题是:有哪些障碍、促进因素和潜在解决方案可以增强少数族裔老年癌症患者参与癌症临床试验的机会?

方法

我们将采用快速范围审查方法,遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的六步框架,包括对文献进行系统搜索,并由两名独立审查员进行摘要和全文筛选、由一名审查员进行数据提取以及使用 Excel 数据提取表由第二名审查员进行验证。本次快速范围审查将纳入符合以下条件的文章:年龄在 18 岁及以上、自认为是癌症少数族裔患者的人群、描述与增强和公平参与癌症临床试验的障碍、促进因素和解决方案相关的疗法/治疗干预/预防/结果的文章。

伦理和传播

所有数据都将从已发表的文献中提取。因此,不需要伦理批准和患者知情同意。范围审查的结果将提交给同行评议期刊发表,并在国际会议上展示。

相似文献

1
Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol.针对少数族裔老年人群体的癌症临床试验参与机会:一项以公平为重点的快速范围界定综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):e074191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074191.
2
Virtual team-based care planning with older persons in formal care settings: a scoping review protocol.虚拟团队为正式照护环境中的老年人制定照护计划:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):e054900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054900.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
5
Help-seeking behaviours among older adults: a scoping review protocol.老年人求助行为的研究综述方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e043554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043554.
6
Supporting implementation of interventions to address ethnicity-related health inequities: frameworks, facilitators and barriers - a scoping review protocol.支持实施干预措施以解决与族裔相关的健康不平等问题:框架、促进因素和障碍 - 范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 9;13(2):e065721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065721.
7
Effectiveness of orthotic treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol of systematic reviews.矫形治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疗效:系统评价的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 8;13(11):e078064. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078064.
8
Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol.复杂性理论在健康和社会保健中的应用:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 28;11(7):e047633. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Attitudes of healthcare professionals in treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: a scoping review protocol.医护专业人员在治疗老年癌症患者决策中的态度:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 11;13(10):e077628. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077628.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the intersection of structural racism and ageism in healthcare.探讨医疗保健中结构性种族主义和年龄歧视的交集。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Dec;70(12):3366-3377. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18105. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
2
A scoping review of ageism towards older adults in cancer care.癌症照护中针对老年人的年龄歧视的范围综述。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Jan;14(1):101385. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.014. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
Interventions to increase racial and ethnic minority accrual into cancer clinical trials: A systematic review.增加癌症临床试验中少数民族和种族人群参与的干预措施:系统评价。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3860-3869. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34454. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.论文 2:进行快速审查。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 30;11(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02011-5.
5
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before.健康政策和体系决策的快速审查:比以往任何时候都更加重要。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 30;11(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01887-7.
6
A Scoping Review of Strategies to Increase Black Enrollment and Retention in Cancer Clinical Trials.增加癌症临床试验中黑人入组和保留率的策略:范围综述
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Sep;18(9):614-632. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00863. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Exclusion of Older Adults from Cancer Clinical Trials: Review of the Literature and Future Recommendations.老年人排除在癌症临床试验之外:文献回顾与未来建议。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr;32(2):125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.003.
8
Stage of colorectal cancer diagnosis for immigrants: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.结直肠癌诊断的移民阶段:加拿大安大略省的一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Dec;32(12):1433-1446. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01491-5. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
9
Age, racial, and ethnic disparities in reported clinical studies involving brachytherapy.涉及近距离放射治疗的报告临床研究中的年龄、种族和民族差异。
Brachytherapy. 2022 Jan-Feb;21(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.06.150. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
10
Racial-Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Guideline-Adherent Treatment for Endometrial Cancer.种族-民族和社会经济差异对子宫内膜癌治疗的影响:指南的遵循情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):21-31. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004424.