• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于集成变量选择的演化偏移检测。

Evolutionary shift detection with ensemble variable selection.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02201-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12862-024-02201-w
PMID:38245667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10800078/
Abstract

Abrupt environmental changes can lead to evolutionary shifts in trait evolution. Identifying these shifts is an important step in understanding the evolutionary history of phenotypes. The detection performances of different methods are influenced by many factors, including different numbers of shifts, shift sizes, where a shift occurs on a tree, and the types of phylogenetic structure. Furthermore, the model assumptions are oversimplified, so are likely to be violated in real data, which could cause the methods to fail. We perform simulations to assess the effect of these factors on the performance of shift detection methods. To make the comparisons more complete, we also propose an ensemble variable selection method (R package ELPASO) and compare it with existing methods (R packages [Formula: see text]1ou and PhylogeneticEM). The performances of methods are highly dependent on the selection criterion. [Formula: see text]1ou+pBIC is usually the most conservative method and it performs well when signal sizes are large. [Formula: see text]1ou+BIC is the least conservative method and it performs well when signal sizes are small. The ensemble method provides more balanced choices between those two methods. Moreover, the performances of all methods are heavily impacted by measurement error, tree reconstruction error and shifts in variance.

摘要

环境的突然变化会导致特征进化的进化转变。识别这些转变是理解表型进化历史的重要步骤。不同方法的检测性能受到许多因素的影响,包括转变的数量、转变的大小、转变发生在树上的位置以及系统发育结构的类型。此外,模型假设过于简化,因此很可能在实际数据中被违反,这可能导致方法失败。我们进行模拟以评估这些因素对转变检测方法性能的影响。为了使比较更加完整,我们还提出了一种集成变量选择方法(R 包 ELPASO),并将其与现有方法(R 包[Formula: see text]1ou 和 PhylogeneticEM)进行比较。方法的性能高度依赖于选择标准。[Formula: see text]1ou+pBIC 通常是最保守的方法,当信号大小较大时,它的性能良好。[Formula: see text]1ou+BIC 是最不保守的方法,当信号大小较小时,它的性能良好。集成方法在这两种方法之间提供了更平衡的选择。此外,所有方法的性能都受到测量误差、树重建误差和方差变化的严重影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/a96ef4cb390c/12862_2024_2201_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/e410158c650c/12862_2024_2201_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/038325b135d7/12862_2024_2201_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/20b9ff2aecc8/12862_2024_2201_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/1a8fab60b8b1/12862_2024_2201_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/666f8659bd35/12862_2024_2201_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/7d08cc902c6c/12862_2024_2201_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/0181dc7a1e75/12862_2024_2201_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/9c9196b39a53/12862_2024_2201_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/893e6347a0dc/12862_2024_2201_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/5ee773fb42bc/12862_2024_2201_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/b3d5fcce2b38/12862_2024_2201_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/21514c7372cd/12862_2024_2201_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/e3f428a8c5f6/12862_2024_2201_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/288765bce25f/12862_2024_2201_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/89fd99096578/12862_2024_2201_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/783f9de40a5a/12862_2024_2201_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/a96ef4cb390c/12862_2024_2201_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/e410158c650c/12862_2024_2201_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/038325b135d7/12862_2024_2201_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/20b9ff2aecc8/12862_2024_2201_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/1a8fab60b8b1/12862_2024_2201_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/666f8659bd35/12862_2024_2201_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/7d08cc902c6c/12862_2024_2201_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/0181dc7a1e75/12862_2024_2201_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/9c9196b39a53/12862_2024_2201_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/893e6347a0dc/12862_2024_2201_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/5ee773fb42bc/12862_2024_2201_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/b3d5fcce2b38/12862_2024_2201_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/21514c7372cd/12862_2024_2201_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/e3f428a8c5f6/12862_2024_2201_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/288765bce25f/12862_2024_2201_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/89fd99096578/12862_2024_2201_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/783f9de40a5a/12862_2024_2201_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/735d/10800078/a96ef4cb390c/12862_2024_2201_Fig17_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolutionary shift detection with ensemble variable selection.基于集成变量选择的演化偏移检测。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02201-w.
2
Inference of Adaptive Shifts for Multivariate Correlated Traits.多变量相关性状的适应性变化推断。
Syst Biol. 2018 Jul 1;67(4):662-680. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy005.
3
Phase transition on the convergence rate of parameter estimation under an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck diffusion on a tree.树上奥恩斯坦-乌伦贝克扩散下参数估计收敛速度的相变
J Math Biol. 2017 Jan;74(1-2):355-385. doi: 10.1007/s00285-016-1029-x. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
Fast likelihood calculation for multivariate Gaussian phylogenetic models with shifts.具有转移的多元高斯系统发育模型的快速似然计算。
Theor Popul Biol. 2020 Feb;131:66-78. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Model Selection Performance in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods Under Multivariate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Models of Trait Evolution.基于性状进化的多元 Ornstein-Uhlenbeck 模型的系统发育比较方法中的模型选择性能。
Syst Biol. 2023 Jun 16;72(2):275-293. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syac079.
7
Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models.在重复-缺失和重复-缺失-转移模型中计算和采样基因家族进化历史。
J Math Biol. 2020 Apr;80(5):1353-1388. doi: 10.1007/s00285-019-01465-x. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
8
Comparing evolutionary rates for different phenotypic traits on a phylogeny using likelihood.在系统发育树上使用似然比较不同表型特征的进化速率。
Syst Biol. 2013 Mar;62(2):181-92. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys083. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
9
Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.比较数据中系统发育信号的检测:行为特征更不稳定。
Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x.
10
Phylogenetic ANOVA: The Expression Variance and Evolution Model for Quantitative Trait Evolution.系统发育方差分析:数量性状进化的表达方差与进化模型
Syst Biol. 2015 Sep;64(5):695-708. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv042. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Inferring Phenotypic Trait Evolution on Large Trees With Many Incomplete Measurements.在具有许多不完整测量值的大型树上推断表型性状进化
J Am Stat Assoc. 2022;117(538):678-692. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1799812. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution.系统发育比较分析:一种适应性进化的建模方法。
Am Nat. 2004 Dec;164(6):683-695. doi: 10.1086/426002.
3
Inference of Adaptive Shifts for Multivariate Correlated Traits.多变量相关性状的适应性变化推断。
Syst Biol. 2018 Jul 1;67(4):662-680. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy005.
4
STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION.稳定选择与适应性的比较分析
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1341-1351. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x.
5
A Relaxed Directional Random Walk Model for Phylogenetic Trait Evolution.一种用于系统发育性状进化的宽松定向随机游走模型。
Syst Biol. 2017 May 1;66(3):299-319. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw093.
6
A novel Bayesian method for inferring and interpreting the dynamics of adaptive landscapes from phylogenetic comparative data.一种用于从系统发育比较数据推断和解释适应性景观动态的新型贝叶斯方法。
Syst Biol. 2014 Nov;63(6):902-18. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu057. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
7
Exceptional convergence on the macroevolutionary landscape in island lizard radiations.岛屿蜥蜴辐射中宏观进化景观的非凡趋同。
Science. 2013 Jul 19;341(6143):292-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1232392.
8
An ensemble correlation-based gene selection algorithm for cancer classification with gene expression data.基于集成相关性的基因选择算法在基因表达数据癌症分类中的应用。
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3306-15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts602. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
9
Modeling stabilizing selection: expanding the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model of adaptive evolution.建立稳定选择模型:扩展适应性进化的奥恩斯坦-乌伦贝克模型。
Evolution. 2012 Aug;66(8):2369-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01619.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
10
The evolution of island gigantism and body size variation in tortoises and turtles.岛屿巨型化和龟鳖类体型变异的演化。
Biol Lett. 2011 Aug 23;7(4):558-61. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.1084. Epub 2011 Jan 26.