Madsen Kristian Tækker, Nørgaard Bjarne Linde, Øvrehus Kristian Altern, Jensen Jesper Møller, Parner Erik, Grove Erik Lerkevang, Mortensen Martin B, Fairbairn Timothy A, Nieman Koen, Patel Manesh R, Rogers Campbell, Mullen Sarah, Mickley Hans, Thomsen Kristian Korsgaard, Bøtker Hans Erik, Leipsic Jonathon, Sand Niels Peter Rønnow
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
The association between coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) and risk of recurrent angina in patients with new onset stable angina pectoris (SAP) and stenosis by CTA is uncertain.
Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of new onset SAP who underwent first-line CTA evaluation and subsequent standard-of-care treatment. All patients had at least one ≥30 % coronary stenosis. A per-patient lowest FFR-value ≤0.80 represented an abnormal test result. Patients with FFR ≤0.80 who underwent revascularization were categorized according to completeness of revascularization: 1) Completely revascularized (CR-FFR), all vessels with FFR ≤0.80 revascularized; or 2) incompletely revascularized (IR-FFR) ≥1 vessels with FFR ≤0.80 non-revascularized. Recurrent angina was evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire.
Amongst 769 patients (619 [80 %] stenosis ≥50 %, 510 [66 %] FFR ≤0.80), 174 (23 %) reported recurrent angina at follow-up. An FFR ≤0.80 vs > 0.80 associated to increased risk of recurrent angina, relative risk (RR): 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.31-2.52, p < 0.001. Risk of recurrent angina in CR-FFR (n = 135) was similar to patients with FFR >0.80, 13 % vs 15 %, RR: 0.93; 95 % CI: 0.62-1.40, p = 0.72, while IR-FFR (n = 90) and non-revascularized patients with FFR ≤0.80 (n = 285) had increased risk, 37 % vs 15 % RR: 2.50; 95 % CI: 1.68-3.73, p < 0.001 and 30 % vs 15 %, RR: 2.03; 95 % CI: 1.44-2.87, p < 0.001, respectively. Use of antianginal medication was similar across study groups.
In patients with SAP and coronary stenosis by CTA undergoing standard-of-care guided treatment, FFR provides information regarding risk of recurrent angina.
在初发稳定性心绞痛(SAP)患者中,冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)衍生的血流储备分数(FFR)与复发心绞痛风险以及CTA显示的狭窄之间的关联尚不确定。
对表现出初发SAP症状的患者进行多中心3年随访研究,这些患者接受了一线CTA评估及后续的标准治疗。所有患者至少有一处≥30%的冠状动脉狭窄。每位患者的最低FFR值≤0.80代表检查结果异常。接受血运重建的FFR≤0.80的患者根据血运重建的完整性进行分类:1)完全血运重建(CR-FFR),所有FFR≤0.80的血管均进行了血运重建;或2)不完全血运重建(IR-FFR),≥1处FFR≤0.80的血管未进行血运重建。使用西雅图心绞痛问卷评估复发心绞痛情况。
在769例患者中(619例[80%]狭窄≥50%,510例[66%]FFR≤0.80),174例(23%)在随访时报告有复发心绞痛。FFR≤0.80与FFR>0.80相比,复发心绞痛风险增加,相对风险(RR):1.82;95%置信区间(CI):1.31 - 2.52,p<0.001。CR-FFR组(n = 135)的复发心绞痛风险与FFR>0.